• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

should teenager like 16 or 17 get the death penality?

Besides the fact that we don't have a death penalty (I agree with that), we also seem to do the reverse: You become an adult under criminal law when you're 18, but under special circumstances you can be prosecuted as a minor until you're 21. And I agree with that as well.
 
Besides the fact that we don't have a death penalty (I agree with that), we also seem to do the reverse: You become an adult under criminal law when you're 18, but under special circumstances you can be prosecuted as a minor until you're 21. And I agree with that as well.

:lol: That would never, ever fly in the US. This is a country where we can try 12-year-olds as adults and lock them up for life.
 
Besides the fact that we don't have a death penalty (I agree with that), we also seem to do the reverse: You become an adult under criminal law when you're 18, but under special circumstances you can be prosecuted as a minor until you're 21. And I agree with that as well.

:lol: That would never, ever fly in the US. This is a country where we can try 12-year-olds as adults and lock them up for life.

Don't forget the mentally handicapped ones.
 
Disagree. I am a firm supporter of the death penalty.

So am I, but only for the extreme cases. If somebody commits armed robbery, but doesn't hurt anybody, then no. Life in prison is good enough.

On the other hand, murderers and rapists don't even deserve a trial. They should be shot dead on sight.

The age of the criminal is irrelevent.
 
No. Rules are rules. If you are under 18 you get treated as a minor for everything. That's why we have rules so we know how to respond in certain situations.

No, we have rules to protect the rich, the guilty, and the scum. Normal, decent people are always screwed.

Yeah, I'm having a bad day.......
 
Disagree. I am a firm supporter of the death penalty.

So am I, but only for the extreme cases. If somebody commits armed robbery, but doesn't hurt anybody, then no. Life in prison is good enough.

Er, we don't lock people up for life for not actually hurting anyone. Usually.

So, if an armed robber beats someone up, you're saying they should be executed? :wtf:

On the other hand, murderers and rapists don't even deserve a trial. They should be shot dead on sight.

Yeah, double Whiskey-Tango-Foxtrot on this one.
 
Disagree. I am a firm supporter of the death penalty.

So am I, but only for the extreme cases. If somebody commits armed robbery, but doesn't hurt anybody, then no. Life in prison is good enough.

Er, we don't lock people up for life for not actually hurting anyone. Usually.

So, if an armed robber beats someone up, you're saying they should be executed? :wtf:

No, I'm saying that anybody who commits MURDER or rape (both inexcusable and unforgivable in my view) should automatically get the death penalty.

And yeah, I know we don't lock people up for life for not hurting anybody, but, armed robbery should be punishable by life imprisonment. Any crime with a gun (or whatever weapon) implies intent to harm.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top