I know. I posted the link you quoted. The point of the link I posted was he apologized.
It was just my general thoughts on the situation. I quoted you because you provided the link.
I know. I posted the link you quoted. The point of the link I posted was he apologized.
Wilson himself disagrees with this statement - which is vapid and ignorant ... and completely lacking the awareness and self-reflection and education represented in Wilson's apology.Please. He said nothing wrong
I would rather see Angel and Mudd work together for a heist.
I like Mudd. I much, much prefer Rainn Wilson's version over the incredibly campy TOS version by Roger C. Carmel. I think this new version would fit into SNW really well.
They went to far basically making Mudd a murderer. He was never that in tos.
I dunno, Leo Walsh passed away "unexpectedly". Seems suspicious.They went to far basically making Mudd a murderer. He was never that in tos.
Dude was not a nice man in TOS. He had Norman hijack the Enterprise with a bomb.They went to far basically making Mudd a murderer. He was never that in tos.
I dunno, Leo Walsh passed away "unexpectedly". Seems suspicious.
They went to far basically making Mudd a murderer. He was never that in tos.
Dude was not a nice man in TOS. He had Norman hijack the Enterprise with a bomb.
"Did Harry Mudd murder Leo Walsh?"
Harry was never into galaxy-wide schemes.Either way, he needs to, along with Angel and Sybok, to be continually brought back as one of the major antagonists secretly pulling strings to stir the pot between all the superpowers during this time frame, imo.
Yes, we can explore his character further. In particular in relation to his… ‘human trafficking’ activities..
Harry was not a human trafficker. In "Mudd's Women"
But he was also supplying an addictive drug to these ladies. This could have given Mudd a form of control over his women, especially if the women were vulnerable in the first place? They were obviously ‘reliant’ on the drug that he was providing to them. They would have still needed the drug when they had been given to husbands, unless their husbands would learn to love them for who they truly are eventually?"Trafficking" is a loaded word that does not apply here.
If the women were held against their will, or forced to perform actions which they would not normally do, then that would be trafficking. But that's not what happened. All Harry did was put women who wanted husbands, in touch with men who wanted wives. That is not trafficking.
But he was also supplying an addictive drug to these ladies.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.