yes but that many Klingon ships destroyed should ring more than one bell in Starfleet.
The real problem is that Starfleet didn't take the destruction of the Kelvin more seriously.
Barely 2 minutes of screen time and Dies off screen with no future mention outside of a joke in the book.Gailia- Uhura being the only female character.
![]()
Not according to Kirk.Had to destroy Narada, or it could've slipped into another time frame.
Always did- Scotty having womanizer thoughts towards the Enterprise.
![]()
Found the Klingon message/confirmed it to give credence to Kirk's warning
Transformers audience is KIDS, and was written to that end. O/C know their audience(s).
The real problem is that Starfleet didn't take the destruction of the Kelvin more seriously.
Well, there's kind of an explanation. The ship appears out of nowhere, the Kelvin is destroyed, and this unknown ship then "disappears" for what turns out to be twenty-five years. There could've been a two, three, or four year period after the event where defenses were on higher alert and they were searching for the ship and trying to collect intelligence on it, but especially if all they got were dead ends, sooner or later, things get back to "normal."
If that's Orci and Kurtzman's idea of a big blockbuster sequel....
We're in huge trouble.
Transfomers, Revenge of the Fallen. Worst 'big' film this past decade. Awful garbage. Boring, over-long, a giant mess, horrible editing, pathetic acting and script and terrible pacing. That's two and a half hours of my life I'd like back.
Trek 2 could be in trouble. Hopefully it's mostly Bay's fault.
Star Trek 2009: Minor hit, but a novelty that has no legs.
Blockbuster hit you mean.
One that has 95% reviewers demanding a sequel ASAP
If that's Orci and Kurtzman's idea of a big blockbuster sequel....
We're in huge trouble.
Transfomers, Revenge of the Fallen. Worst 'big' film this past decade. Awful garbage. Boring, over-long, a giant mess, horrible editing, pathetic acting and script and terrible pacing. That's two and a half hours of my life I'd like back.
Trek 2 could be in trouble. Hopefully it's mostly Bay's fault.
First of all being a Transformers fan for almost as long as I've been a Trekkie, let me learn you some Transformers now....What I don't understand is how one could day the t1 was any good...
I saw it as part of free in-flight entertainment when it was released and it was a pile of [edit] rubbish [/edit].
And this is coming from some-one who at the time thought the cheapo Japanese early morning transformer Toons were half-way decent.
Transformers may make money, but its not because its a decent film by any of the usual markers.
Canada, sort of. It's a product of ice-age glaciation and of the outflow of the St Lawrence (Lawrence, Laurentian) River into the North Atlantic....the Laurenthian trench (ooh where did that come from) ...
I'll even make it for him.You've got to give M'Sharak time to sit down and have a cup of tea before starting the new forum!
I was just curious, for example, how long this forum was established before the movie debuted. It doesn't seem like they really have anything to talk about yet.
still like the idea of keeping the forum but just rebrand it.
for one thing we will have the dvd's and whatever extra's there are and by then possibly more tidbits about the next movie.
They're not different. They are stylistically the same. That is why the two are being compared.Since Transformers and Star Trek are very different films I don't really see what bearing one has on the other.FemurBone said:I've said it before and i'll say it again. A franchise cannot be built on explosions and shaky cameras.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.