I don't think its emo. I think it is just exploring those difficult emotions and how each person manages it.
Well, yeah. That's the reason I used quotations. Not just because it isn't a word I normally use.

I don't think its emo. I think it is just exploring those difficult emotions and how each person manages it.
Ooohhhhh....Well, yeah. That's the reason I used quotations. Not just because it isn't a word I normally use.![]()
You completely misunderstood the scene. It wasn't meant as a better death scene for Data, since Data was just an AI copy of the original living in a simulation. It was closure for Picard after 20 years. Him saying goodbye and finally letting go.And yet - the most emotional scene in the finale - was the death of a character that didin't even appear in this entire show, except for in a short flashback in the beginning, and who has already died. In another movie. And already GOT his emotional good-bye scene!
And yet, they felt the need to kill him again, because none of their own characters was developed enough to make his or her demise an emotional gratifying scene. That's sad. Imagine TNG's first season's built-up was only to bring back Spock, to kill him again, for an emotional reaction for the TOS crowd.
This show was not about "Picard not being able to let go of Data for 20 years".You completely misunderstood the scene. It wasn't meant as a better death scene for Data, since Data was just an AI copy of the original living in a simulation. It was closure for Picard after 20 years. Him saying goodbye and finally letting go.
The scene in question was. The show itself was about Picard making peace with his past (including, you know, Data) and finding new purpose.This show was not about "Picard not being able to let go of Data for 20 years".
The scene in question was. The show itself was about Picard making peace with his past (including, you know, Data) and finding new purpose.
Had the Data scene come out of the blue like TATV, I'd agree. But it's been set up since the very first episode, and constantly brought up during the show. Even if you'd never seen Next Gen, you knew Data was important to Picard and that his death hung over him, so the scene would work.Which is an okay thing to do. But it rings hollow if it it's the emotional climax - because I think it's a bad idea to base the emotional finale of your story around nostalgia for another, older show.
It's the same thing with the ENT finale "These are the Voyages": IMO it would have been a very okay-ish episode set somewhere within the series. As a conclusion to the main story - it's disappointing, because it's essentially sidelining the current characters of this story in favour for weaponized nostalgia for an older, already finished story.
This show was not about "Picard not being able to let go of Data for 20 years".
Indeed, yes. Data became the representation of all of Picard's emotional pain and sense of failure and lost legacy.Had the Data scene come out of the blue like TATV, I'd agree. But it's been set up since the very first episode, and constantly brought up during the show. Even if you'd never seen Next Gen, you knew Data was important to Picard and that his death hung over him, so the scene would work.
It could be argued that that’s exactly what it was about.
Yeah, I get why people might not like that, but that's what the show ended up being about. It's the through-line from the very first scene.
I sometimes wonder if dragging in the Borg and Seven and the Romulan refugees and all that just served to raise fan expectations and set the stage for disappointment.
6
It's just ok. It's not the series I thought it was going to be. I wasn't expecting TNG 2.0 but I was expecting a Picard show that focused more on the man than all this nonsense plot of AI mythology, bad acting Romulans and a romance plot on a Borg cube.
Most of the cast were boring
The plot explanation was never clear. Soji is Data's daughter, no wait she was created by Bruce Maddox, no wait she's from a planet of AI, no wait she was built on a planet of AI by Maddox, no wait Data's human brother helped create her! Why can't they just say something in a simple and clear way.
Same with the admonition. A bunch of blah blah the darkness is coming to get us. What happened to reason and science?
Anyway. I will be tuning in for season 2.
I think the reason they included the Borg had more to do with them being TNG's other main enemy besides the Romulans. That's what would've gotten the ball rolling initially.
Then they might've figured after they thought of it, how Picard never got over assimilation. Seven being another such character was someone who could ask Picard point-blank, "What's it like for you?" And she's someone who he knows he can give a real answer to and she'll know what it means, instead of a stock answer to someone else who wouldn't. That's my take on it.
.
The fact that his Romulan housekeepers didn't get a resolution this season doesn't bother me. They were going to be left behind when Picard boarded La Sirena and began his mission so the fact we didn't see them again in Episode 10 didn't mean anything to me. The Borg, however, were a dropped ball almost from the start and largely anticlimactic. Aside from Hugh and the female Romulan who went crazy after seeing the vision of the Absolution none of the xB's really mattered.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.