It's not unheard of. But it is usually a surname."Cleveland Booker"
Is Cleveland a normal person name in the USA? I have only heard it before as the name of a city.
Is this a serious complaint? Characters with names we recognize? So it would be better as "K'Leev'nd BkEEr ?Cleveland Brooker... way to start, Disco Season 3. Because, yeah, in 1000 years we can expect people to have still XX century names and last names. Wow, just WOW. I have been questioning Discovery writers since season 1, and things are just falling off the cliff.
I'm sure some might prefer it.So it would be better as "K'Leev'nd BkEEr ?![]()
"I am V'Leev'nd BkEEr of the V'Draysh, nice to meet you."It's not unheard of. But it is usually a surname.
Is this a serious complaint? Characters with names we recognize? So it would be better as "K'Leev'nd BkEEr ?![]()
the federation can be the basis of the V'draysh, they can be similar in some things and very different in others. A language spoken by them is English, at least we know that!Cleveland Brooker... way to start, Disco Season 3. Because, yeah, in 1000 years we can expect people to have still XX century names and last names. Wow, just WOW. I have been questioning Discovery writers since season 1, and things are just falling off the cliff.
You know, going 1k years into the future is risky for the franchise. First, you risk making all the past canon irrelevant. And second, you would expect things to be so drastically different, that depiction of this alien future could fail easily. Why didn't they pick a more reasonable 2-300 years into the future? Think about how things are different now compared to the XI century. Culturally, visually, scientifically... Plus, they are now messing with a period of time already touched by ENT with the Temporal Cold War. I can honestly see this going very bad, very quickly. Lots of downside, very little upside.
What made TNG so successful with fans was, IMO, that while in the future it wasn't that far off from TOS to be unrecognizable. 100 years are a good time frame where lots of change can happen, but everything can still be tied back to the old stories.
Now, 1k years is a HUGE gap. All we know could well be irrelevant, but the gap is so large that so many things could have happened that all that happened in the past lost relevance. Like you were living in the Roman Empire, and next thing you now you are in the USSR. You lose completely context and relevance... UNLESS... the past is somewhat used as foundation for the present (i.e., Roman and Greek civilization were the foundation of modern Western Society).
If in the far future the Federation didn't exist anymore (or the ideals/concept inspired by them), then Discovery Season 3 would totally be a waste of everyone's time and another bad attempt to reboot the franchise. Which, honestly, has been underwhelming since the beginning, plagued by rushed screenplay and very poor character development.
I am as excited about Picard and Lower Decks as I am totally not looking forward to Disco Season 3.
I think you mean "Eh oom V'Leev'nd BkEEr uv tee V'Draysh, nys tw miit u.""I am V'Leev'nd BkEEr of the V'Draysh, nice to meet you."
Never met a Jim Kirk before but I met a James Bond once.In my lifetime, I've met four different men named Jim Kirk.
It's crazy that this is a statement that was actually typed. Seriously!? The history of names today is very long. For example William as a name has existed since the 11th century, actually before that if you account for different spellings based on area. If this character was an alien then he should have an alien sounding name but he appears to be human so him having a human sounding name when human names today have existed and lasted hundreds of years makes complete sense. Them lasting hundreds of years into the future again is completely reasonable.Cleveland Brooker... way to start, Disco Season 3. Because, yeah, in 1000 years we can expect people to have still XX century names and last names. Wow, just WOW. I have been questioning Discovery writers since season 1, and things are just falling off the cliff.
An article about the DIS panel with a lot of quotes:
https://trekmovie.com/2019/07/21/sd...ery-panel-promises-huge-changes-for-season-3/
It's crazy that this is a statement that was actually typed. Seriously!? The history of names today is very long. For example William as a name has existed since the 11th century, actually before that if you account for different spellings based on area. If this character was an alien then he should have an alien sounding name but he appears to be human so him having a human sounding name when human names today have existed and lasted hundreds of years makes complete sense. Them lasting hundreds of years into the future again is completely reasonable.
Not a lot of substance, though.
I wish Kurtzman would shut up about Gene’s Vision TM, about which I could not care less, and just talk about the show.
I really like Discovery, but the focus on appeasement will drag it down, and already has to a degree.
That's what Picard feels like.I really like Discovery, but the focus on appeasement will drag it down, and already has to a degree.
They can't get DiscoSpock's Vulcan bowl cut right. It's too curved at the sides this time.
They can't get DiscoSpock's Vulcan bowl cut right. It's too curved at the sides this time.
I strongly suspect this is a permanent thing; the "explanation" for Discovery's canon wobbles sort of relies on that.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.