• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Scruffy-looking untitled Han Solo film thread

Well, it's good to see they're upholding the tradition of having Star Wars surnames sound unusual by real-world standards. :rolleyes:
 
Well, it's good to see they're upholding the tradition of having Star Wars surnames sound unusual by real-world standards. :rolleyes:
That boat already sailed. Dameron (Poe's last name) is a real surname, and the character is named after Abrams's assistant. Hell, on Rebels we have the surnames Bridger and Wren, both of which are used in the real world.
 
That boat already sailed. Dameron (Poe's last name) is a real surname, and the character is named after Abrams's assistant. Hell, on Rebels we have the surnames Bridger and Wren, both of which are used in the real world.

Don't forget Sato.


But I thought he already said he was playing Shrike.

Did he mean "a Shrike-like character"?

He didn't seem to be paying attention at all or have all focus when he was asked that.
 
Not if they still want to make their release date of next summer. They already had reshoots planned for later in the year; depending on what exactly the creative difference was, the alteration may only be to the final act of the film. The second unit directors (Dominic Fysh & Scott Bunce) should be able to finish whatever scenes didn't bother Kennedy and the LFL brass and get them that much further ahead in the game.

Imagine the Director's Guild will have something to say on a new director coming in mid-shoot and only redoing a handful of scenes, though - didn't Richard Lester have to reshoot something like 50-70% of Superman II before the DGA would give him sole director's credit over Richard Donner? I don't know if LFL will still want Lord & Miller's names in the credits after firing them.
 
The bizarre thing is if they waited three weeks for primary shooting to be finished they could have just pulled the same stunt they did with Rogue One again to far less publicity.

It wasn't because they had those "Han Shot First" t-shirts made for the crew was it...
 
Obviously I don't know anything about the ins and outs, but I get the feeling sometimes these directors forget the toys they're playing with in these big franchise sandboxs aren't theirs. *cough* Edgar Wright *cough* At the end of the day they're not your characters and you can't just do whatever you want. I'm sure it's frustrating but you should know that before you sign on.
 
It wasn't because they had those "Han Shot First" t-shirts made for the crew was it...

Considering George Lucas famously wore a "Han Shot First" shirt just to show what a good sport about it all he was, that would be unbelievably petty on Kathleen Kennedy's part.

Well, Disney knows what the need to do to get a billion dollar film every year, so I'll trust them.

So far Disney's been content to just sit back, let Pixar, Marvel, LFL etc. get on with it, and watch the money roll in. Between Carrie Fisher's death (or, more to the point, the recent revelation why), the bombing of Episode IX director Colin Treverrow's recent film The Book of Henry and now this, though, I reckon there's got to be some nervous phone calls starting to go back and forth between Burbank and San Francisco. "You folks have got this, right...?"
 
Last edited:
Those must be the creative differences to end all creative differences to warrant this kind of disruption to a 200+ million dollar movie this late in the game. No doubt an interesting story in someone's biography one day.
 
but I get the feeling sometimes these directors forget the toys they're playing with in these big franchise sandboxs aren't theirs. *cough* Edgar Wright *cough*
The situation with Edgar Wright and Ant-Man is one of the more boneheaded decisions on the part of Marvel/Disney, especially if the stories are true that the only issue was Marvel wanted the movie obviously connected to the MCU continuity. Which I am inclined to believe, since in the movie the MCU connections just feel so ham-fisted in, like when Hydra just suddenly shows up for the climax and does nothing but watch the final battle.
 
Wow, what the hell happened here? Creative differences with a massive film due in less than a year? They didn't notice these differences after the script was done? or when they stared filming 4 months ago?
 
Which I am inclined to believe, since in the movie the MCU connections just feel so ham-fisted in, like when Hydra just suddenly shows up for the climax and does nothing but watch the final battle.


If I remember correctly, HYDRA (otherwise known as Mitchell Carson) had also appeared when Darren Cross was showing his video clip about his Yellow Jacket serum. And he also appeared in the movie's prologue. Worse, he got his hands on Cross' serum without paying a dime.

I'm sure that the Han Solo film will be delivered with flying colors. I have can recall a good number of successful films that experienced this kind of shake up.
 
the bombing of Episode IX director Colin Treverrow's recent film The Book of Henry
Boy, I'd love for Trevorrow to be dropped from SW, but I doubt that will happen. :(

The situation with Edgar Wright and Ant-Man is one of the more boneheaded decisions on the part of Marvel/Disney, especially if the stories are true that the only issue was Marvel wanted the movie obviously connected to the MCU continuity.
If that were truly the only deciding factor, then I'd say it was a boneheaded movie on Wright's part rather than Marvel. Drop out of a film you've planned for years because they want a few references to the greater MCU? That sounds mental.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top