• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Script blunders!

@Maurice

Thanks for the input, now if we can just find the Fontana rewrite/draft we might settle something one way or the other.
There's an OMITTED scene in between but I don't have other drafts handy to see what it was.

Anyway, since the next scene after the start of Spock's examination is Sulu and Chekov gossiping about the course changes, it's entirely possible Kirk went right up to the bridge and said, "Back to Altair," before returning to his quarters.
I wonder if the omitted scene was Kirk returning to the bridge to order the course correction?
 
Last edited:
Re "Amok Time"

There's an OMITTED scene in between but I don't have other drafts handy to see what it was.
I wonder if the omitted scene was Kirk returning to the bridge to order the course correction?
The omitted scene took place in sickbay and involved McCoy and Chapel 1). setting-up the diagnostic instruments for Spock's physiology and 2). talking about Chapel's "friendship" with Spock. The scene ends with this exchange:
CHRISTINE
(cool)
I find him professionally
interesting. To live totally
without emotion must be
difficult. I… I find that,
as I said… interesting.

McCOY
Hard to believe anyone is totally
without emotion. During your,
ah… pursuit of his friendship,
hasn’t he shown any… you know
what I mean, any inclination toward, ah, hanky-panky of any
sort?

DOOR SOUND interrupts. They turn:

I don't understand why this scene was cut. ;)
 
Even with the cringeworthy "inscrutable Oriental" discussion, what I hated was that Sulu could say..."you know...those images on celluloid stuff" before someone had to say "cinema" and "movies." He even says he watched them, yet "celluloid" stuck in his brain instead of "movies" or "cinema" or even "entertainment tapes."
That's like when Sulu somehow found it necessary to explain the mechanics of a police revolver in "Shore Leave":
"It fires lead pellets propelled by expanding gases from a chemical explosion."

Wouldn't people still know the basic principles of firearms in the 23rd century? I mean, nobody has to explain to me how a bow and arrow works.

My go-to example of awful dialog in TOS (hence also a script blunder) is this for Kirk in "Court Martial" [http://www.chakoteya.net/StarTrek/15.htm]:

By installing a booster, we can increase that capability on the order of one to the fourth power.​
Ah, the infamous "one to the fourth power" line. Just sloppy writing that should have been caught and corrected. Like this exchange from "The Naked Time":

McCOY: Your pulse is two hundred and forty two, your blood pressure is practically nonexistent, assuming you call that green stuff in your veins blood.
SPOCK: The readings are perfectly normal for me, Doctor, thank you. And as for my anatomy being different from yours, I am delighted.

Of course, it wasn't Spock's anatomy that was under discussion, it was his physiology.
 
Last edited:
Roddenberry himself cringed over the "one to the" line saying they should have caught it. Mistakes happen.

I just looked through the documentation available. No one comments on it in any of the memos I can see.
 
Roddenberry himself cringed over the "one to the" line saying they should have caught it. Mistakes happen.

I just looked through the documentation available. No one comments on it in any of the memos I can see.

The person who should have caught it was Kellam DeForest. Seems like he was asleep at the switch.
 
The person who should have caught it was Kellam DeForest. Seems like he was asleep at the switch.
"He" was a company. He didn't personally review everything.

Anyway, this presumes de Forest Research saw the dialog in question. Many times there were page/dialog revisions that did not get cleared.
 
Last edited:
"He" was a company. He didn't personally review everything.

Anyway, this presumes DeForrest Research saw the dialog in question. Many times there were page/dialog revisions that did not get cleared.

What I love about these researchers was their proprietary libraries. They had so many diverse reference books at their fingertips, packed into modest offices, it must have been a book- and fact-lover's dream job.

Another, similar Hollywood research outfit was run by Lillian Farber, wife of Star Trek TMP pre-production illustrator Harold Michelson. Her career ultimately ran into the time when instant access to any fact on the Internet was destroying the research business model. If you haven't seen the 2018 documentary Harold and Lillian: A Hollywood Love Story, I recommend it.
 
Time for some pedantry!

His name is Kellam de Forest (still alive at 93, as far as I know). His company was de Forest Research, Inc. or de Forest Research for short (he sold out to Thompson and Thompson in 1997). My understanding is that Kellam was not one of the regular readers for Star Trek, although he was somewhat more involved during development.
 
Here's a terminology snafu from "The Cage"/"The Menagerie" [http://www.chakoteya.net/StarTrek/16b.htm]:

KEEPER: That is your choice. To help you reclaim the planet's surface, our zoological gardens will furnish a variety of plant life.​

Um. "Zoological garden" is just the unabbreviated term of "zoo," a place where specifically animals are kept, not specifically plants. Sure, animals may need plants for their habitats, so no doubt plants are kept there too, but.... :sigh: It's wrong. It's as if it was written to impress with wordiness without having the actual requisite understanding to use the term properly, a not uncommon cause of the misuse of terminology.

---

While none of the following category is definitively wrong in the way the "one to the" "Court Martial" example is, there is quite a bit of Treknobabble that is cringeworthy. Here are two examples.

First example, from "Errand of Mercy" [http://www.chakoteya.net/StarTrek/27.htm, https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Richter's_scale_of_cultures]:

Approximately Class D minus on Richter's scale of cultures​

:wtf: A couple of things wrong, there are. First, the teacher almost flunks the Organians' culture; they probably should have studied harder, eh? Second, Richter scale? Really??? I knew Richter was a mover and a shaker, but.... :sigh: ;)

Second example, from "The Apple" [http://www.chakoteya.net/StarTrek/38.htm, https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Wortham_unit]:

SCOTT: Scotty, sir. We have a reading on the power source Mister Spock requested. When we first monitored, it was generating alternating cycles totalling one hundred to the twentieth power Wortham units.​

As everybody knows ;), the SI unit of power (energy per time) is watt, named after James Watt. This fictional unit of power induces groans, because it sounds about like "Watt, um." James Watt was even Scottish, so Scotty should be ashamed of himself.... ;)The Memory Alpha link just above contains de Forest Research's feedback for the line, but IMO they should have recommended the correction to "watts" as well, and scaled it appropriately. For reference, the Sun puts out about 3.846×10^26 watts [https://ag.tennessee.edu/solar/Page...ated,radius of approximately 93,000,000 miles, http://www.yourturn.ca/solar/solar-power/how-much-power-does-the-sun-give-us/], and on the order of 10^17 watts of it falls to Earth [second source]. So, saying "ten to the 17th power watts" would have been something like the thing to say, never minding how it is that Vaal is generating enough power to immobilize a starship from the few exploding rocks that this one village tosses in (a problem that's never solved anyway).
 
Stardates. And some scripts even painted themselves into knots using the undefined unit of time. One example (and there are many others):

And the Children Shall Lead has Starnes log dates 5025.3-5038.3 on-screen; Kirk's log at 5029.5 has to be after Starnes' death or shortly after Stardate 5038.3. Kirk’s entry should be after Starnes last log at about 5039.5. An obvious script error.​
 
Time for some pedantry!

His name is Kellam de Forest (still alive at 93, as far as I know). His company was de Forest Research, Inc. or de Forest Research for short (he sold out to Thompson and Thompson in 1997). My understanding is that Kellam was not one of the regular readers for Star Trek, although he was somewhat more involved during development.

I still find the similarity of his name and DeForest Kelley amusing since they were attached to the same series. It's not like either of these guys had "Pete Williams" style average names.
 
I still find the similarity of his name and DeForest Kelley amusing since they were attached to the same series. It's not like either of these guys had "Pete Williams" style average names.

And despite it being Hollywood, both men were using their birth names. I actually found it confusing and mysterious as a boy, pondering the photo caption with Kellam's name in The Making of Star Trek. This was decades before the Internet, so there was no one to ask.

Edit: I thought it was a photo caption; now I can't find it. But his name is in the book.
 
Last edited:
That's exactly my point. An earlier episode said the Kirk's brother sister-in-law and their three children saw him off on his five-year mission and later a writer of a later script either either knows of the previous script and chooses to ignore it or doesn't know how many nephews Captain Kirk has and just writes it and nobody bothers to explain it or correct it. It's left to the audience to say oh well I guess they're older and they moved on with their lives. There are literally hundreds of little inconsistencies that the writers ignored or never knew about that fans for the past fifty years have been explaining away with their own explanations.
Also by the way the way the script was written the boy was now pretty much an orphan and decided to live with friends of the family on deneva. If you had two older siblings wouldn't the first choice to be to go live with his brothers rather than just be given to friends of the family? Clearly the writer of the episode did not take into account that it had been previously established that he had siblings presumably older and off on their own if he knew of them at all. But I suppose if you want to you can make up a convoluted excuse why his two older siblings couldn't take care of him but the fact of the matter is the scriptwriter had no clue about the so-called older siblings or did not care.
.

That sounds like a flub in Continuity. I thought that they would have a manual with all of the pertinent information, But, I guess NOT. That probably came later.
 
yes, Remember the clip of Roddenberry standing at the top of the stairs of the "Operation: Annihilate!", and they played the "Hail The Fuhrer!" audio from "Patterns of Force" ?
 
You mean the Shatner who played a horse, slapped himself silly, danced, and later wore a minidress in "Plato's Stepchildren"? That Shatner? Because he was a trouper when the script called for putting his ego aside.



Also, the visor didn't look very expensive for the prop department to make. If you're doing two of them, with strips of plastic that need to be cut and curled, you can do three for the same cost of materials. They had to buy that plastic in units bigger than the prop, and the excess lengths of plastic going into the trash would be plenty if you wanted that third visor.
I made the visor myself for Halloween at no great expense. Of course no-one understood who I was...
Sturgeon's outline was approved by NBC late during production on the first season (December 15, 1966), but he didn't deliver the first two acts of his 1st draft teleplay until March 29, 1967. Roddenberry told his agent flat out on March 15, 1967 that Sturgeon would be cut off and another writer would be assigned to write the script if he didn't deliver.

In other words, Sturgeon blew any chance for the episode to be made during season one by taking months to produce a 1st draft teleplay. His reputation for a laborious writing process was well-earned.

Regarding Blish's "Amok Time" adaptation, it was done for Star Trek 3 and was written well after the episode was made. I doubt Blish was sent an outline.

How come the Blish adaption was so different from the filmed episode?
Actually thats not the only case. I think I read in some of his prefaces that he hadn't actually seen the episodes and perhaps I'm thinking he made changes to make the episodes make sense to him.

Anyway Kirk's 'Come With Me..' on the bridge is one of my favourite Trek scenes with its dump de da you're in trouble Mr Spock music. So I'm happy they didn't meet on Deck 5 whatever.

Another error I think is in Naked Time when Spock says there was an imposter on board when Kirk is accused on attacking Rand. Then a later scene has him holding the duplicated dog creature. Surely that scene should have been shown first.
 
Another error I think is in Naked Time when Spock says there was an imposter on board when Kirk is accused on attacking Rand. Then a later scene has him holding the duplicated dog creature. Surely that scene should have been shown first.

The Enemy Within, but yeah there was a scene juggle apparently
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top