• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Robbed of Seasons 5-7

AdmiralBruno

Lieutenant Commander
Red Shirt
How could this show not have been a hit? I know it started off slow but come on... by Season 4 it was ADDICTING.... just really great storytelling... we were definitely robbed of three years.

And when they killed Trip... sickening. It added nothing and just made a sadder premature end even worse.
 
I feel your pain. The audience was there--12 million people tuned in for the pilot episode--they just took too long to really get going.
 
I had started to find it's feet by the time it actually got cancelled, yet the network had already made their decision, they never wanted a prequel Star Trek anyway and on the whole the shows ratings had been declining since DS9.

I think the show needed a break before doing Enterprise, in fact the producers pleaded with the network to take a break before bringing the show out (yet another thing the network ignored them on).

The other thing I think Season 4 had going for them was the format of 'mini arcs' I think at that point in time many people were 'bored' with singular episodes that were wrapped in in 1 episode, so having the season 4 format was actually refreshing.
 
It was never going to last 7 years. Not in the TV climate of the 21st Century. If they accepted CBS offer to screen it in 2001 and dumped UPN, it wouldn't even have lasted two. Off the back of Manny Coto's hard work turning it around, another year would really have been worthwhile seeing, but I think they had already made the decision to cancel it at the end of Season 3. Arguably before Enterprise had found its sweetspot, and the multi-arc format they should really have had from the beginning.

And the Studio weren't going to settle for the numbers watching. Even if they were pretty much at the level other sci-fi shows like Battlestar Galactica and Stargate were getting at the time. Different story now, with a lot of programming basically streamed at small if dedicated audiences, when Network television decides it's not for them.

I don't think Seasons 1 and 2 were that bad myself. Just too slow off the mark. There's some ongoing story strands for the characters, and prequel building from episode to episode in there. There are just extraneous episodes in each that, for the most part, are too much like what had already been done before. Particularly the further into each season you get. Decide which episodes are essential (and dare I say it even unique) to Enterprise and which aren't, and there's a modern 13 part run to Season 1 & 2 desperately trying to escape.
 
Last edited:
There was still no reason to call broken Bow broken Bow,

A Hillbilly farmer took down a Klingon warrior.

That was 35 seconds.
 
Going by how weak it was S1 it got much more than it deserved!
Yet I am re-watching S1 at the moment and it is nowhere near as bad as I remembered it, I mean when I first watched it I found some episodes ok and some pretty poor yet even the poor ones have become ok in this re-watch. In fact I think I like S1 of Enterprise better than I remember enjoying any of the other Trek's S1's.

Since I have come to Enterprise 'fresh' with no Star Trek burnout so to speak I am more appreciative for what the producers were trying to accomplish.
 
From a technical standpoint, Enterprise was incredibly well made because it was Voyager Season 8.

The actors were fantastic because Berman got lucky.

Most of the scripts could have been early TNG.

Been there, done that.
 
I must be the only person who enjoyed season 1?? I always hear rants that the show didn't get going until season 3 or, more commonly, season 4. I enjoyed those last two seasons but found plenty in the first two that was enjoyable as well!

Of course, I only watched the show for the first time last year!

To the topic, I too would have liked to see the show continue but agree with those that said the landscape of television was rapidly changing. I think it could have been the best Star Trek show in the world, and it still would have struggled, awash with reality shows and the like.
 
I must be the only person who enjoyed season 1?? I always hear rants that the show didn't get going until season 3 or, more commonly, season 4. I enjoyed those last two seasons but found plenty in the first two that was enjoyable as well!

Of course, I only watched the show for the first time last year!

To the topic, I too would have liked to see the show continue but agree with those that said the landscape of television was rapidly changing. I think it could have been the best Star Trek show in the world, and it still would have struggled, awash with reality shows and the like.

Which is why I think the show needed a break after Voyager before getting to Enterprise, there are a fair number of people who go back after a few years and even find themselves enjoying Season 1, I am one of these people, I found S1 and S2 quite indifferent the first time around but in re-watching S1 recently I am enjoying S1 quite a bit. I guess that is because I am coming back to this fresh, similar to your first watch only being last year (years after the show finished)
 
I think there were two big problems that hurt the show from the get go. In no particular order:

1. The show betrayed its own premise as a prequel right off the bat. We had the Klingons in the pilot episode when they were 23rd Century villains, and then went on to see the Ferengi and the Borg, who presumably weren't seen or heard of until the 24th. Throw in all the 23rd Century tech and you don't have a 22nd Century show at all any more, just another Trek show pretending to be that. People twigged pretty quickly to the fact that it wasn't anything 'new,' just more of the same in slightly different packaging.

2. The casting of Bakula as Captain Archer. Nothing against Scott, his acting abilities, or what not, but the whole thing just never worked very well. It was always an awkwardly forced, clunky characterization.

All that aside, I think Manny Coto was in the process of saving the show by S4. I would have welcomed a couple more seasons based on the work he was doing. So in that sense, yeah, we were robbed. I think if they'd have stopped after Voyager and Enterprise was the new series coming up, we might have been in for something better.
 
I'm one of the many who thought that the show was improving in season 4. Apparently the Sci Fi Channel offered to pick it up but Berman or Paramount passed. I wonder why they did that. I felt deprived of a Shatner guest appearance more than anything.

There was still no reason to call broken Bow broken Bow,

A Hillbilly farmer took down a Klingon warrior.

That was 35 seconds.
Looked like Braga had a thing for naming episodes after places.
 
The ratings were just fine. And they were getting the audience most advertisers lust after; look at the commercials. They were for IBM servers and luxury cars. Those ads were aimed at decision makers and high earners. Advertisers research who watches what very carefully and place their ads accordingly. Those ads were not there by mistake.

I can hear the question: Well, if the ratings were okay, why cancel it?

Because decisions aren't always made rationally or thoughtfully or are even smart. You just have to look at UPN's programming decisions around that time to see that the network was not exactly being run by geniuses. As for not letting SyFy have it, I have no clue why anyone would reject that. Except that I have been told that Les Moonves (head of CBS) absolutely hates SF and hated Enterprise. His actions, such as destroying the sets (which were beautiful pieces of craftsmanship) immediately following the series' cancellation (if not for the one fan who has the bridge set there would be virtually nothing left) speaks volumes.

I admit to prejudice; I loved Enterprise from the start and was (and still am) mystified by the "haters" who used to make it their life's work to denigrate the series at any and every opportunity. You don't like something? Don't ruin it for those who do. I never got the Voyager love, but if you liked it, have at it. (Mind you, my initial enjoyment of The Big Bang Theory is slowly turning into hate watching as Sheldon's character grows from unaware quirky to knowing obnoxiousness, but that's a whole 'nother story.)

Cancellations are part of network television, and I have been trying to figure out why this particular cancellation has bothered me so much. I think it's because of the death of Trip. Poorly constructed, badly written ... I could go on and on, but this thread is not about The Abomination. Offhand, I can't think of another series that ends by killing off a major character in such a god-awful fashion.

There is a movement afoot for a renewal, but I dunno ... Other series have been revived, but I fear that CBS is only in it for the $$$ and they see Enterprise as a losing proposition. I think otherwise, but obviously, they're not listening to me. But still ... the actors have all said they'd come back, and even a mini-series would be cool. The Romulan war would make a heckuva good story, IMO.
 
Star Trek Enterprise Viewers.

Season 1. 12.5 m (high) = 4.5 m (low).

Season 2. 6.3 m (high) = 3.3 m (low).

Season 3. 4.59 m (high) = 2.86 m (low).

Season 4. 3.8 m (high) = 2.56 m (low).
 
It was never going to last 7 years. Not in the TV climate of the 21st Century.
Yup. Which is a shame, considering what they had set up for seasons 5-7: the rise of the Federation and approaching war with the Romulans. You could consider seasons 3 and 4 as a rehearsal for telling those stories.

I must be the only person who enjoyed season 1??
Some of it I like very much. Other parts I don't. It was very inconsistent.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top