I never understood the one-upmanship. The Sci Fi fanbase is ridiculously competitive. It's like sports teams or something. We have a dozen police procedural shows on the air, with teams of investigators fitting the same sort of roles. Yet the producers of these shows don't badmouth each other and fans relish having a lot of choices in their genre.
Or if one show comes out and it's a success, people aren't trashing the shows following. "You stole my lawyer show concept!" But god help the producers and fans of any SF show that came out after original Trek got popular. If it wasn't living up to Trek, it sucked. If it followed Trek too closely, it was a ripoff. I used to catch hell and attitude by Trekkies who found out I also like Lost in Space and Space:1999. For that reason alone, I don't miss the 70's.
DS9 was a decent show that I followed and enjoyed. Babylon 5 was a decent show that I followed and enjoyed. Neither was perfect, both had great episodes, and both had really awful ones. Whatever.
Or if one show comes out and it's a success, people aren't trashing the shows following. "You stole my lawyer show concept!" But god help the producers and fans of any SF show that came out after original Trek got popular. If it wasn't living up to Trek, it sucked. If it followed Trek too closely, it was a ripoff. I used to catch hell and attitude by Trekkies who found out I also like Lost in Space and Space:1999. For that reason alone, I don't miss the 70's.
DS9 was a decent show that I followed and enjoyed. Babylon 5 was a decent show that I followed and enjoyed. Neither was perfect, both had great episodes, and both had really awful ones. Whatever.