Maybe you guys could carry on in PM or create a thread in the appropriate forum....
Why would someone edit out Sonak? Between him and the wormhole scene, it hammers home just how unready the Enterprise was for duty.
Commentary on alternate edits of TMP are still on track.
Commentary on alternate edits of TMP are still on track.
No. Fan edits that skirt the line of legality aren't what I'm in the Star Trek Movies I-X forum to discuss. A fan edit of one of these films is, by definition, none of them.
This. The major beats are excellent (and in fact enhanced by many of the the Special Longer Version additions), but you lose two major things trying to get the pacing under control:I think Star Trek: The Motion Picture is Star Trek's imperfect masterpiece. It asks big questions (within a TV/film context), has great characterizations, moves the universe forward in a meaningful way (until the reset button at the end) but is plagued by pacing issues.
This. The major beats are excellent (and in fact enhanced by many of the the Special Longer Version additions), but you lose two major things trying to get the pacing under control:I think Star Trek: The Motion Picture is Star Trek's imperfect masterpiece. It asks big questions (within a TV/film context), has great characterizations, moves the universe forward in a meaningful way (until the reset button at the end) but is plagued by pacing issues.
1) The SFX, particularly of V'ger's interior
2) The music.
I hope they try something similar in the future. They seem to be getting pacing so right in movies now.
I hope they try something similar in the future. They seem to be getting pacing so right in movies now.
The pacing is perhaps too frenetic now and the content is a bit flippant and dumbed down. The movies were so successful, they won't change that much but I do wish they would at least get in a scientific consultant so that the real world science isn't so obviously wrong that an 8-year old boy can spot them.
I hope they try something similar in the future. They seem to be getting pacing so right in movies now.
The pacing is perhaps too frenetic now and the content is a bit flippant and dumbed down. The movies were so successful, they won't change that much but I do wish they would at least get in a scientific consultant so that the real world science isn't so obviously wrong that an 8-year old boy can spot them.
Very much agree! I so miss the thoughtfulness of Trek at its best -- not just in terms of scientific laws or concepts, but the physical environments as well. Some examples: the "belt buckles" integrated into the costumes were bio-monitors that continuously kept tabs on the health of the crew. Or, the colored dots that blink on the monitors built into the ceilings of the hallways are supposed to indicate which divisions have staff present in that section of the hallway. Who's doing this kind of attention to detail any more? These two examples (of MANY) are never explained in the film, yet the makers took the time to consider how this future universe might work. Despite the lack of explanation, it permeates the film and gives it a level of reality that (for me) is missing in newer Trek.
Why would someone edit out Sonak? Between him and the wormhole scene, it hammers home just how unready the Enterprise was for duty.
Why would someone edit out Sonak? Between him and the wormhole scene, it hammers home just how unready the Enterprise was for duty.
But is that really necessary for the plot? TFF starts with Enterprise being glitchy, but that feeds into not being able to beam to Nimbus III or the God Planet. It's been a while, but I don't recall the technical problems of Enterprise feeding into the V'Ger encounter at all.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.