cultcross said:
^ indeed. At that point, in fact, the film would have a similar relationship to the book what it has now to Star Trek as a licenced property, in CBS's eyes. A free form of advertising, which will hopefully increase sales of the licenced for-profit product.
Jimmy_C said:
Just because you have an opinion doesn't mean it makes sense! Nobody cares about just having an opinion. Why you have it is more important. Otherwise why even give your opinion if you're unwilling to discuss or even change it?
A good question, and obviosuly one you should ask yourself if your response to disagreement is "you're wrong."
In fact, I agree with J. Allen regarding VOY and ENT. ST:NV in particular has produced episodes which are superior to some episodes of VOY and ENT. ST:OGAM looks set to be in a similar league.
I DID explain my reasoning, so obviously I did ask it to myself...
You and J. Allen didn't say WHY you thought so, just that you did. Rather than being cute, why not justify your own thoughts. Introspection and writing it down is an important part of growth.

The actor who played old Charlie was pretty bad though.