He's no more a theist than I am.
Sorry, I meant "deist" and corrected myself later.
Besides, I am talking about Picard and you're quoting Data. Seems we're arguing at cross purposes here.
He's no more a theist than I am.
Besides, I am talking about Picard and you're quoting Data. Seems we're arguing at cross purposes here.
...
He doesn't know.
That's not my idea of an agnostic, not by a lot.
That's your right. I see it differently.
I disagree. Once you start talking about "superior power" or something to that effect, you've left the camp of the agnostics and happily joined the one of the deists.
Picard did not conclude the existence of a deity, so that couldn't possibly be deism.I am not arguing his reasons for being what he is. I am arguing what he is, and that's a deist.
Q is a "superior" power, and Picard KNOWS he exists. Doesn't make him a deist.
Picard did not conclude the existence of a deity, so that couldn't possibly be deism.
Nope.a bunch of assumptions amounting to "a deity" , "a superior being " or whatever.
Your words, not his.followed by a bunch of assumptions amounting to "a deity" , "a superior being " or whatever
Right.Your words, not his.
Your words, not his.
He's real in the Star Trek universe, which is what we're talking about here. Remember?Q is not real.
So no more or less honest than your average deity.And even if he was real, we don't really know what he is. The info we get about him are contradictory. Once he says that he's always existed and the next time he speaks he tells you that he's four billion years old???
Again, just like your average Deity.Of all the trek species, the Qs are among the most ill-defined and contradictory. IWO the Qs are a joke.
That's not the way the series put it.He's real in the Star Trek universe, which is what we're talking about here. Remember?
So no more or less honest than your average deity.
Again, just like your average Deity.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.