This thread is now approaching FULL DEEPAK.
I’ve been learning some Japanese to prepare for a trip to Japan later in the spring. It’s making me think about trying to become insanely multilingual.
After Japanese I’d consider Hindi, Spanish and Arabic the strongest. Hindi cause I know so many Indian people and also because it could later help in my career, Spanish for obvious reasons, and Arabic cause it’s spoken by the people my government doesn’t want me to empathize with.
But the easiest of them all is Esperanto, I don't get why more people don't learn it. It's at least three times easier to learn than any other language. Hell, it's been designed by a linguist to be that way!!
Esperanto may be easy to learn (although I know I'd screw it up) but how useful would it be to do so? What practical, real-world situations could there be to speak it?
Since it's very easy to learn, if everyone learned it as a second language the practicality of it would be obvious.
You could go anywhere in the world and talk to people without a problem. If that is not practical then I don't know what is.
Classic chicken/egg scenario.
If everyone learned Esperanto, it would be useful; if it was useful, everyone would learn it.
But it won't happen, because there are no countries where Esperanto is the native language. People learn other languages now, at least in part because they want to visit places where those languages are spoken.
Railroads were built because there was an economic need for them. It was only later that they transported people as well as cargo.
... but how useful would it be to do so? What practical, real-world situations could there be to speak it?
I can't believe this argument is taking place on a board where people learn Klingon.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.