I think David Lee Roth is a douche, but that doesn’t stop me from enjoying his music.
Yes? They're not the greatest movies in the world. Neither are Tarantino's movies, incidentally. But several of them have been great Star Trek movies, at least as much as the budget allowed.
He does do that. He also does rampant misanthropy behind every scene, and a world of moral repugnance (just in varying degrees) in every character, which is just not what I want to see in Star Trek.
I did say that I thought he was a cock
He does do that. He also does rampant misanthropy behind every scene, and a world of moral repugnance (just in varying degrees) in every character, which is just not what I want to see in Star Trek.
I did say that I thought he was a cock
While I've enjoyed Tarantino's movies, I'm uneasy of Trek going from "first female Trek movie director" (SJ Clarkson, for the aborted ST4) to a guy getting #MeToo heat from some of his former stars.
Uma Thurman stopped working on Quentin Tarantino's movies for a reason. She was treated horribly. I have to separate the creator from the product.
We all do to an extent. We're here posting on a board about Star Trek. Gene Roddenberry was pretty messed up.
I could be wrong but it looks like you guys don't like Tarantino.
Just to clarify, I'm not saying he's a terrible person (I have no information on him personally, except what happened with Uma Thurman, which is indeed totally unacceptable) or even that his movies are terrible things that shouldn't exist. I think they work for what they are and I don't think what they are is automatically bad or unacceptable.
It's just the idea of putting on a Star Trek movie and seeing something like the Hateful Eight or Inglorious Basterds with Vulcans and Klingons is rather like ordering an Ice Cream Sundae and being served a sauerkraut salad in the shape of an ice cream sundae. It could be the greatest sauerkraut salad in history, but it wouldn't be a good experience at all.
It's not like he gets carte blanche to do whatever he wants. Given the money Paramount will likely be sinking in to it a producer will be there to give green lights.It's just the idea of putting on a Star Trek movie and seeing something like the Hateful Eight or Inglorious Basterds with Vulcans and Klingons is rather like ordering an Ice Cream Sundae and being served a sauerkraut salad in the shape of an ice cream sundae. It could be the greatest sauerkraut salad in history, but it wouldn't be a good experience at all.
Doesn't apply in the court of public opinion.Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty in a court of law?
I don't know what happened with Uma Thurman
Could you elaborate ?
It's not like he gets carte blanche to do whatever he wants. Given the money Paramount will likely be sinking in to it a producer will be there to give green lights.
That's fair. But, they still will have a someone there stating the studio's interests.Except every news story so far seems to point to him doing his normal style and none of us actually knows that Paramount doesn't want him to do his normal style. The fact that they're interested in him at all is clearly for his name recognition and popularity. If they want him to reinvigorate their movie franchise, then they may very well want him to do something radically different that will make people sit up and take notice.
Hell, it might even work and be great for Paramount's coffers, even if it isn't necessarily great for Star Trek (IMO).
Samuel L. Jackson as Benjamin Sisko and Uma Thurman as Kira Nerys?
I think he's a cock
I may have mentioned that once or twice
His films are over rated in my opinion, but I think it would be funny to see Tarantino Trek, just for the fucking hell of it
"Do you know what they call a Quarter Pounder with Cheese on Qo'noS?"
Correct, so the full scene will go like this:I think the federation uses the metric system.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.