• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Quentin Tarantino confirms his Star Trek movie will be R-rated, full of profanity.

I think David Lee Roth is a douche, but that doesn’t stop me from enjoying his music.

Wagner was an antisemite and a horrible person in general (he would sleep with the wives of his benefactors) but he composed the best music ever. It would be a terrible loss for humankind if we stopped listening to his music because of what he was.
 
Yes? They're not the greatest movies in the world. Neither are Tarantino's movies, incidentally. But several of them have been great Star Trek movies, at least as much as the budget allowed.



He does do that. He also does rampant misanthropy behind every scene, and a world of moral repugnance (just in varying degrees) in every character, which is just not what I want to see in Star Trek.

I did say that I thought he was a cock
 
I did say that I thought he was a cock

Just to clarify, I'm not saying he's a terrible person (I have no information on him personally, except what happened with Uma Thurman, which is indeed totally unacceptable) or even that his movies are terrible things that shouldn't exist. I think they work for what they are and I don't think what they are is automatically bad or unacceptable.

It's just the idea of putting on a Star Trek movie and seeing something like the Hateful Eight or Inglorious Basterds with Vulcans and Klingons is rather like ordering an Ice Cream Sundae and being served a sauerkraut salad in the shape of an ice cream sundae. It could be the greatest sauerkraut salad in history, but it wouldn't be a good experience at all.
 
He does do that. He also does rampant misanthropy behind every scene, and a world of moral repugnance (just in varying degrees) in every character, which is just not what I want to see in Star Trek.
I did say that I thought he was a cock
tumblr_mtjiekSOum1s67vyfo6_250.gif
 
While I've enjoyed Tarantino's movies, I'm uneasy of Trek going from "first female Trek movie director" (SJ Clarkson, for the aborted ST4) to a guy getting #MeToo heat from some of his former stars.
 
While I've enjoyed Tarantino's movies, I'm uneasy of Trek going from "first female Trek movie director" (SJ Clarkson, for the aborted ST4) to a guy getting #MeToo heat from some of his former stars.

Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty in a court of law?
 
Uma Thurman stopped working on Quentin Tarantino's movies for a reason. She was treated horribly. I have to separate the creator from the product.

We all do to an extent. We're here posting on a board about Star Trek. Gene Roddenberry was pretty messed up.
 
Uma Thurman stopped working on Quentin Tarantino's movies for a reason. She was treated horribly. I have to separate the creator from the product.

We all do to an extent. We're here posting on a board about Star Trek. Gene Roddenberry was pretty messed up.

Well, if we were to exclude all the creators who are/were alcoholic, terrible persons, junkies, racists, and whatnot. There wouldn't be much left.
 
I could be wrong but it looks like you guys don't like Tarantino.

I think he's a cock
I may have mentioned that once or twice :D
His films are over rated in my opinion, but I think it would be funny to see Tarantino Trek, just for the fucking hell of it
 
Just to clarify, I'm not saying he's a terrible person (I have no information on him personally, except what happened with Uma Thurman, which is indeed totally unacceptable) or even that his movies are terrible things that shouldn't exist. I think they work for what they are and I don't think what they are is automatically bad or unacceptable.

It's just the idea of putting on a Star Trek movie and seeing something like the Hateful Eight or Inglorious Basterds with Vulcans and Klingons is rather like ordering an Ice Cream Sundae and being served a sauerkraut salad in the shape of an ice cream sundae. It could be the greatest sauerkraut salad in history, but it wouldn't be a good experience at all.

I don't know what happened with Uma Thurman
Could you elaborate ?
 
It's just the idea of putting on a Star Trek movie and seeing something like the Hateful Eight or Inglorious Basterds with Vulcans and Klingons is rather like ordering an Ice Cream Sundae and being served a sauerkraut salad in the shape of an ice cream sundae. It could be the greatest sauerkraut salad in history, but it wouldn't be a good experience at all.
It's not like he gets carte blanche to do whatever he wants. Given the money Paramount will likely be sinking in to it a producer will be there to give green lights.
Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty in a court of law?
Doesn't apply in the court of public opinion.
 
I don't know what happened with Uma Thurman
Could you elaborate ?

She didn't want to film a driving scene for Kill Bill because she wasn't comfortable with the safety of the car. He talked her into it despite knowing that the location had been changed at the last minute and no one had actually checked the new road to see if it would really be safe. She crashed and nearly died.

It's not like he gets carte blanche to do whatever he wants. Given the money Paramount will likely be sinking in to it a producer will be there to give green lights.

Except every news story so far seems to point to him doing his normal style and none of us actually knows that Paramount doesn't want him to do his normal style. The fact that they're interested in him at all is clearly for his name recognition and popularity. If they want him to reinvigorate their movie franchise, then they may very well want him to do something radically different that will make people sit up and take notice.

Hell, it might even work and be great for Paramount's coffers, even if it isn't necessarily great for Star Trek (IMO).
 
Last edited:
Except every news story so far seems to point to him doing his normal style and none of us actually knows that Paramount doesn't want him to do his normal style. The fact that they're interested in him at all is clearly for his name recognition and popularity. If they want him to reinvigorate their movie franchise, then they may very well want him to do something radically different that will make people sit up and take notice.

Hell, it might even work and be great for Paramount's coffers, even if it isn't necessarily great for Star Trek (IMO).
That's fair. But, they still will have a someone there stating the studio's interests.
 
I think the federation uses the metric system.
Correct, so the full scene will go like this:

DECKER: You know what they call a Quarter Pounder with Cheese on Qo'noS?​

MITCHELL: They don't call it a Quarter Pounder with Cheese?

DECKER: No, man, they got the metric system there, they wouldn't know what the fuck a Quarter Pounder is.

MITCHELL: What'd they call it?

DECKER: They call it ta' with nIm wIb ngogh

MITCHELL: What'd they call a Big Mac?

DECKER: Big Mac's a Big Mac, but they call it ghu'vam Big Mac.

MITCHELL: [repeating] "ghu'vam Big Mac". What do they call a Whopper?

DECKER: I dunno, I didn't go into a Burger King. You know what they put on french fries on Praxis instead of ketchup?

MITCHELL: What?

DECKER: The blood of those they defeated in battle.

MITCHELL: Goddamn!​
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top