Who cares when you have holodecks?
Who cares when you have holodecks?
Excellent point. It's the holodeck that would make prostitution not necessarily *illegal*, but obsolete.
Holodeck??????? Holodeck!!!!!!! LMAO! A holodeck, at best, would be nothing more than a glorified wank!
Look, I don't care how far into the future you get, no way in hell are they EVER going to replace the feel, sensory preception, and enjoyment of flesh against flesh! Simulate it, perhaps, but never, ever replace it.
Also capitalism is probabaly not the same there as here. No way in hell the United Federation of Planets would allow no bid contracts, or corporations writing legislation for the Federation Council.
Remember the CEO they thawed on TNG? The guy freaked becuase he didn't know what he would do in the 24h century. If things were business as usual, he could have cared less.
Who cares when you have holodecks?
Excellent point. It's the holodeck that would make prostitution not necessarily *illegal*, but obsolete.
From TOS to DS9, was prostitution legal?![]()
there are always going to be people who want the real deal, who want actual flesh and blood, not a simulation.
If the federation does allow prostitution I see it taking a "classier" path, like we see in Firefly.
Holodeck??????? Holodeck!!!!!!! LMAO! A holodeck, at best, would be nothing more than a glorified wank!
Look, I don't care how far into the future you get, no way in hell are they EVER going to replace the feel, sensory preception, and enjoyment of flesh against flesh! Simulate it, perhaps, but never, ever replace it.
I'm assuming here that the holodeck is accurate...if it wasn't, no one would ever use it for sex, and we've seen (or heard about) it being done, several times.
From TOS to DS9, was prostitution legal?![]()
Is there a reason you didn't include Voyager or Enterprise in the question?
From TOS to DS9, was prostitution legal?![]()
Is there a reason you didn't include Voyager or Enterprise in the question?
No slight intended. Voyager was supposed to concurrent with DS9. But, got anything from either show that would tend to support or refute?
From TOS to DS9, was prostitution legal?![]()
It was definitely implied to be so on Wrigley's Pleasure Planet and Argelius II.
And Risa.
About the Dabo girls: I seem to remember at least one ep where one of them complains that Quark had claimed that sex *with him* was part of their contract. Nothing about doing it with customers, though. A Dabo girl just has to charm the customer so they'll spend money at the gambling table. They're not whores.
It was definitely implied to be so on Wrigley's Pleasure Planet and Argelius II.
And Risa.
About the Dabo girls: I seem to remember at least one ep where one of them complains that Quark had claimed that sex *with him* was part of their contract. Nothing about doing it with customers, though. A Dabo girl just has to charm the customer so they'll spend money at the gambling table. They're not whores.
Bajor wasn't in the Federation. I don't think Risa was either.
This is an issue Trek has, ahem, skirted a few times.
First, TOS had a few examples of women who certainly seemed to do their best to make themselves available.
In "Wolf in the Fold," while there is no mention of payment, the women in the bar certainly seem to throw themselves at the men.
The three women in "Mudd's Women" where the equivalent of mail order (Male order?) brides in outer space, but certainly seemed to have no compunctions about using their charms to get what they wanted out of people.
The Dabo girls are certainly suggestive of prostitutes despite some comments to the contrary.
Malcolm and Reed on Risa, while not stating it outright, seem to be pretty sure they will get lucky with the locals.
I cannot think of an outright mention of prostitution, but the writers get their point across when they want to.
In any event, DS9, by the very virtue of it's name, was a Starfleet installation, and under Federation control. Think of one our bases in Guam, Germany, or Korea.
In any event, DS9, by the very virtue of it's name, was a Starfleet installation, and under Federation control. Think of one our bases in Guam, Germany, or Korea.
It wasn't. It was jointly controlled by Bajor and the Feds. Hence the amalgamated command.
Our bases in Guam, Germany, or Korea don't have civilian restaurants and shops on them.
In any event, DS9, by the very virtue of it's name, was a Starfleet installation, and under Federation control. Think of one our bases in Guam, Germany, or Korea.
It wasn't. It was jointly controlled by Bajor and the Feds. Hence the amalgamated command.
Our bases in Guam, Germany, or Korea don't have civilian restaurants and shops on them.
It's been a LONG time since I wathced DS9, a show I really enjoyed (except for the last episode which really stank.) That having been said, I always had the impression, from the pilot I believe, that the Bajorans made the station available to and for the Federation as a deep space base.
As the Bajorans wanted entrance into the Federation, as well as Starfleet protection and training, I can't see them saying, No Emissary, this our tree, as far as we are concened the Federation is nothing but squirrels looking for nuts."
The other point of course is why would Starfleet agree to a joint control agreement? In the event of an emergency Starfleet would need total control, as well as the right to determine what constitutes an emergency. Nope, an agreement like that wouldn't even pass the giggle test with Starfleet CNC, let alone the Federation's version of the DOD.
Who cares when you have holodecks?
It wasn't. It was jointly controlled by Bajor and the Feds. Hence the amalgamated command.
Our bases in Guam, Germany, or Korea don't have civilian restaurants and shops on them.
It's been a LONG time since I wathced DS9, a show I really enjoyed (except for the last episode which really stank.) That having been said, I always had the impression, from the pilot I believe, that the Bajorans made the station available to and for the Federation as a deep space base.
They did, but numerous epsiodes also made it clear that the station remained Bajoran territory that the Federation was allowed to administer as a starbase only at Bajor's pleasure. (Hence Kira's lodging a formal complaint about Starfleet's refusal to hand the station over to the Bajorans prior to the Dominion attack in the Season 5 finale -- though that was a false formal complaint filed to give the Bajorans political cover so that they wouldn't look like they were taking sides when they were supposed to be neutral.)
As the Bajorans wanted entrance into the Federation, as well as Starfleet protection and training, I can't see them saying, No Emissary, this our tree, as far as we are concened the Federation is nothing but squirrels looking for nuts."
Yeah, but the fact remained that the Bajoran government always retained the option of kicking Starfleet off the station if it so chose.
The other point of course is why would Starfleet agree to a joint control agreement? In the event of an emergency Starfleet would need total control, as well as the right to determine what constitutes an emergency. Nope, an agreement like that wouldn't even pass the giggle test with Starfleet CNC, let alone the Federation's version of the DOD.
But the canonical evidence is that it did, especially since we saw members of the Bajoran Militia serving in the command structure alongside Starfleet officers.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.