They don't like "woke" in that one either.![]()
LOL...good point, I forgot about that too.
Well...guess there's Starship Troopers for them
They don't like "woke" in that one either.![]()
I mean, people like all kinds of things. My earliest episodes were Balance of Terror and Where No Man Has Gone Before. Those are mostly avlc5ion oriented and people focus on what they like.I'm still trying to square how you can be a Star Trek fan yet scream about "woke".
Unless of course its just the ships and space battles people reaaaally like, in which case..there's another franchise for that
I like Starship Troopers too.LOL...good point, I forgot about that too.
Well...guess there's Starship Troopers for them
I mean, people like all kinds of things. My earliest episodes were Balance of Terror and Where No Man Has Gone Before. Those are mostly avlc5ion oriented and people focus on what they like.
Dangerous to assume why people became fans and what messages they picked up on.
Again, assumption.No no, I know...I mean about saying that Trek had "gone woke" when it's been "woke" since the earliest days of social progressivism
Verhoeven's intent probably went straight over their heads.LOL...good point, I forgot about that too.
Well...guess there's Starship Troopers for them
Verhoeven's intent probably went straight over their heads.![]()
The message of BOT is kind of "woke". The message of WNMHGB is about power corrupting.I mean, people like all kinds of things. My earliest episodes were Balance of Terror and Where No Man Has Gone Before. Those are mostly avlc5ion oriented and people focus on what they like.
Dangerous to assume why people became fans and what messages they picked up on.
I think GR's "progressive" ideas for Star Trek are well documented.Again, assumption.
You're assuming people dig in enough to find out.I think GR's "progressive" ideas for Star Trek are well documented.
When the Roddenberry official site was releasing PDFs of early TNG script drafts for the 25th anniversary, you could tell which notes were Gene’s and which were Maizlisch’s. That smarmy twerp had his hands in everywhere on those scripts. Quite right for Gerrold and Fontana to get him booted from the writers offices by the WGA.Gene Roddenberry is the Bob Kane of Star Trek. Especially from 1987 to 1991.
David Gerrold wrote the TNG Series Bible, and -- when watching first season episodes -- you really have to know Gene Roddenberry's writing style to be able to tell where Gene Roddenberry ends and Leonard Miazlish begins. The worse the writing, and the clunkier it sounds, the more likely it's Miazlish. Since he wasn't a creative type. The more philosophical it sounds, or the more TOS-like it sounds, it's probably Roddenberry.
Rod Roddenberry is an executive producer on all current Star Trek shows. He is the son of Gene Roddenberry.Don't understand this need to rate Trek based on how close a link it had to Roddenberry.
Are those archived anywhere online?When the Roddenberry official site was releasing PDFs of early TNG script drafts for the 25th anniversary, you could tell which notes were Gene’s and which were Maizlisch’s. That smarmy twerp had his hands in everywhere on those scripts. Quite right for Gerrold and Fontana to get him booted from the writers offices by the WGA.
https://web.archive.org/web/20181230232102/http://www.roddenberry.com/media/vault/Are those archived anywhere online?
This is perfect! I'll be able to compare this to what I picked up upon when re-watching TNG Season 1 in 2019.
I find the "nu Trek" and "woke" ideas to be excessively divisive
a segregated fanbase
"Woke" ideas are only divisive if you don't believe everyone is equal.
I think people need bigger vocabularies personally. Whole things got a bit naff.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.