• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Picard News & Reviews from Outside Sources

I'm still trying to square how you can be a Star Trek fan yet scream about "woke".

Unless of course its just the ships and space battles people reaaaally like, in which case..there's another franchise for that
I mean, people like all kinds of things. My earliest episodes were Balance of Terror and Where No Man Has Gone Before. Those are mostly avlc5ion oriented and people focus on what they like.

Dangerous to assume why people became fans and what messages they picked up on.
 
I mean, people like all kinds of things. My earliest episodes were Balance of Terror and Where No Man Has Gone Before. Those are mostly avlc5ion oriented and people focus on what they like.

Dangerous to assume why people became fans and what messages they picked up on.

No no, I know...I mean about saying that Trek had "gone woke" when it's been "woke" since the earliest days of social progressivism
 
I mean, people like all kinds of things. My earliest episodes were Balance of Terror and Where No Man Has Gone Before. Those are mostly avlc5ion oriented and people focus on what they like.

Dangerous to assume why people became fans and what messages they picked up on.
The message of BOT is kind of "woke". The message of WNMHGB is about power corrupting.
Again, assumption.
I think GR's "progressive" ideas for Star Trek are well documented.
 
Gene Roddenberry is the Bob Kane of Star Trek. Especially from 1987 to 1991.

David Gerrold wrote the TNG Series Bible, and -- when watching first season episodes -- you really have to know Gene Roddenberry's writing style to be able to tell where Gene Roddenberry ends and Leonard Miazlish begins. The worse the writing, and the clunkier it sounds, the more likely it's Miazlish. Since he wasn't a creative type. The more philosophical it sounds, or the more TOS-like it sounds, it's probably Roddenberry.
When the Roddenberry official site was releasing PDFs of early TNG script drafts for the 25th anniversary, you could tell which notes were Gene’s and which were Maizlisch’s. That smarmy twerp had his hands in everywhere on those scripts. Quite right for Gerrold and Fontana to get him booted from the writers offices by the WGA.
 
When the Roddenberry official site was releasing PDFs of early TNG script drafts for the 25th anniversary, you could tell which notes were Gene’s and which were Maizlisch’s. That smarmy twerp had his hands in everywhere on those scripts. Quite right for Gerrold and Fontana to get him booted from the writers offices by the WGA.
Are those archived anywhere online?
 
"Woke" ideas are only divisive if you don't believe everyone is equal.

Oh the irony of that statement. Woke is the antithesis of equality. It is the advocacy of certain social or ethnic groups over others. It is the silencing of any voice in disagreement with the mob minority. And I could go on, but the point is made.
 
There is clearly ‘woke — being aware of social issues with a view to positive change’ ‘woke — being performative in pretence of ideological superiority in order to make oneself look good or sell products (see also: virtue signalling, political correctness)’ ‘woke — a pejorative used in a political manner against a mindset or culture you find opposite to your own, typical from what is nominally the right versus the left (see also political correctness)’ ‘woke — being awake’ ‘woke — a political and cultural movement with associations with California, that has many or all things in common with other definitions, and an interpretation that may include taking control of political narrative and changing/stifling discussion (see also: political correctness)’ ‘woke — slang of likely African-American Vocalised English origin concerning awareness of systemic discrimination in the United States’ ‘woke — a design of Levi’s jeans advertised on SNL’ ‘woke — slang term describing an item in the style of earlier definitions, except the Jeans, and can be considered equivalent to something being good or bad, depending on speaker and possibly lunar cycle’….

I think people need bigger vocabularies personally. Whole things got a bit naff.
Unfortunately or fortunately, Trek has matched many of the interpretations over the years, apart from maybe the jeans.
 
I think people need bigger vocabularies personally. Whole things got a bit naff.

Oh but be careful with that. Yet another definition for Woke is deciding decades or even centuries later that certain words in our vocabulary violate Wokeness and by God any one - even a thousand goddamned years ago - that uttered those words has to be excoriated and utterly removed from human history.

You could lose the Himalayas in the gap between Woke and what Star Trek was pre Kurtzman.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top