I don't think it's all suitMaybe they can put him in a ridiculous muscle suit like in Superman and Lois. Imagine him in the big chair, with watermelons for shoulders.


I don't think it's all suitMaybe they can put him in a ridiculous muscle suit like in Superman and Lois. Imagine him in the big chair, with watermelons for shoulders.
Oooo who is that sexy man????I don't think it's all suit
![]()
Tyler Hoechlin. Currrenly Superman in the "Superman and Lois" TV show,Oooo who is that sexy man????
He would have been a hot Spock! Maybe he still can be one day…Tyler Hoechlin. Currrenly Superman in the "Superman and Lois" TV show,
I don't think it's all suit
![]()
Dude looks pretty jacked off screen too.There is some trickery afoot though. Watch for views of him as Clark and look for how small his chest and shoulders appear compared to this image.
It couldn’t possibly be a ‘deep fake’?There is some trickery afoot though. Watch for views of him as Clark and look for how small his chest and shoulders appear compared to this image.
Perhaps our dreams are an alternate universe doppelgangers reality.This has important implications on metaphysical, quantum and philosophical levels. Possibly on other levels that I have not been made aware of too. In a true multi verse any one can be anything or anyone at any time if we want them to be, and no one would ever know the difference as we all perceive the multiverse though our own perception and experiential existence so we can use our imaginations to ‘de-buff’ what is being dictated or enforced on to us. If we disagree with something we can agree to differ and view the difference through our own narrative and perspective which is acceptable to us and allows our opinion or impression to run parallel with that of another view or interpretation which differs. This is like us creating our own parallel universes in our minds. This means we can all get along because even if we see something differently we see it abstractly in a parallel way that is acceptable from both of our perspectives. I could look at Kirk and see a women, you could look at Kirk and see a man. Someone else could look at Kirk and see a ‘they’ or even a toaster. We are all looking at the same character though. Maybe Kirk should be portrayed in an ’artistically fluid way’? We are all looking at the same character as previously mentioned, we are just projecting our own physical perception of the character through our own unique lense? We have our own imaginations. We do need to respect the original intentions of the people who created the characters though, as they had a vision and as Star Trek fans we should try to respect this and make sure that TBTB follow canon. As long as a character embodies it’s original artistic intention as intended by their creator, physically it should not matter how they are portrayed? They do need to keep it realistic and not try to push boundaries for the sake of it, or to troll Kirk fans… we are still only human and we like familiarity. No one should change things for shock value or to make a point though. If it is not broken then there is no need to fix it. Kirk was never really broken, so in my mind he does not need to become a women… yet.![]()
Don’t care that he doesn’t look like Shatner though I think if they found the right actor who did it would have been a bonus
But he had zero charisma to portray the most charismatic space character of all time.
I didn’t particularly like Chris (Luke Skywalker Solo Kirk ) pine but he has charisma in spades
and quite frankly This actor needs to go on the juice, pickup some weights and eat many chicken breasts
Christian Bale had a better physique in the Machinist and I’ve seen Versace runway models with thicker necks
In an otherwise very joyous and near perfect season,…
Please recast
I don't think it's all suit
![]()
It's what fans seem to want. Despite the sentiment expressed here I see positive reception from fan articles, as well as expectations for Kirk.But now, well, we have more of this coming. Something, we didn't need. They shouldn't have gone there. Stick with Pike and his adventure, don't go to Kirk. Why? Why do that and bring yourself to that comparison unless you're sure you have it?
Pike was featured in a number of novels released throughout the 2010s, the most recent prior to Desperate Hours being in 2015. The depiction of of Pike in DH is very much in line with those novels.I didn't read other novels with Pike, but I did read the Star Trek: Early Voyages series, and that didn't feel consistent to me. It also didn't feel consistent with Pike from "The Cage" or the Kelvin films.
I'm kind of surprised Kirk wasn't in the first episode--sitting on his bike staring at the Enterprise in her berth at the Riverside Dockyards...It's what fans seem to want. Despite the sentiment expressed here I see positive reception from fan articles, as well as expectations for Kirk.
Is it needed? Hell no. Is it expected? Yup.
Still one of my favorite scenes.I'm kind of surprised Kirk wasn't in the first episode--sitting on his bike staring at the Enterprise in her berth at the Riverside Dockyards...
Whoops, wrong timeline...
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.