So, what, Mid-90's is now "ancient"?
No one's said that. I was just pointing out that a companion from the mid-90s is not a contemporary character.
As far as I am concerned, Mid-90's is just as a good as "contemporary".
I don't believe you're thinking this through. Think of all the things that have changed since the early-to-mid-90s:
- The World Trade Organization was established
- The rise of the European Union
- The fall of the Soviet Union and rise of Vladimir Putin
- The end of the Troubles
- The assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and the rise of the Israeli right
- The Oklahoma City Bombing
- The end of apartheid and the election of Nelson Mandela in South Africa
- Rise of al Qaeda and Osama bin Ladin
- Russia-Chechnya war
- Rise of Tony Blair and New Labour
- Rise of the World Wide Web, Web 2.0
- Cellular telecommunications technology
- 9/11 attacks on the Pentagon, destruction of the World Trade Center, Afghan War
- Iraq War
- Election of Barack Obama
- Rise of India and China as upcoming superpowers
- Invention of the DVD
- Final end of the dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet in Chile
- End of immunity laws for the Argentine military dictatorship
- Rise of the "Washington Consensus," international neoliberalism
- Publication of
Harry Potter
- Hurricane Katrina
- 2004 Indonesian Tsunami
- Independence of Kosovo, Kosovo War
- Dissolution of Yugoslavia, arrest of Slobodan Milošević
- Orange Revolution in Ukraine
- London Bombings, 3/11 attacks
Etc.
The world is a vastly different place today after only about 15-20 years, even just from a day-to-day perspective. I think it might be very interesting to see how someone from the mid-90s would react to the world in the late 2000s.