• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Paramount Confirms TWO Star Trek films currently in the works!

I wonder if Tarantino's Trek might be along the lines of Logan, in as much as it exists in its own little pocket universe, using many of the same actors but selectively cherrypicking continuity (i.e. Days of Future Past definitely didn't happen)
and feature a grisly end to the kelvin crew.
KbRB25xH_JBb1yZk4DPfPOEfVxo=.gif
 
Who would you cast as Picard? I'd have either a French man or something to explain the English accent like he was kidnapped by gypsies as a small boy and sent to an English Boarding school (as gypsies do).
 
Space: t' final frontia. These are t' voyages o' t' starship Enterprise. Tts five-year mission: ta explooar strange new worlds. Ta seek art new life 'n new civilizations. Ta bahdly nip on wheear neya 'un 'as gone afowa!

It got a tad Geordie by the end, but that’s pretty good xD
In fact why haven’t they got a Geordie security chief yet?
 
If it's a Kirk's crew movie, they may well use the same cast even if it's not the same continuity, if that makes sense. Like how Logan ignored X-Men: Days of Future Past and only explicitly acknowledges the first film.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pst
If it's a Kirk's crew movie, they may well use the same cast even if it's not the same continuity, if that makes sense. Like how Logan ignored X-Men: Days of Future Past and only explicitly acknowledges the first film.

It didn't really. Days of Future Past overwrote itself at the end of that movie. In the rewritten timeline, the future that would lead to Logan was just that Xavier's school was still open and active and Jean and Scott never died. No other info about the outside world was shown. All that was true in Logan's history, too, until Xavier's illness accidentally killed everyone at the school.

And if the Tarantino movie is a darker or riskier take (which would be logical, though not guaranteed), it wouldn't make much sense to use the same cast.
 
It didn't really. Days of Future Past overwrote itself at the end of that movie. In the rewritten timeline, the future that would lead to Logan was just that Xavier's school was still open and active and Jean and Scott never died. No other info about the outside world was shown. All that was true in Logan's history, too, until Xavier's illness accidentally killed everyone at the school.

And if the Tarantino movie is a darker or riskier take (which would be logical, though not guaranteed), it wouldn't make much sense to use the same cast.
Xavier references meeting Logan as happened in X1, and other events of that movie. DoFP gives us very different first meetings for Logan and Charles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pst
Xavier references meeting Logan as happened in X1, and other events of that movie. DoFP gives us very different first meetings for Logan and Charles.

DoFP is when Charles meets future Logan who was already an X-Man. After future Logan snaps back to the future, 1970s Logan still knew nothing about any of this stuff. He most likely was still throwing his life away as a cage fighter when Xavier found him and gave him a spot as an X-Man. Certainly, Apocalypse made it very clear that the whole weapon x incident still happened in largely the same way (with, obviously, some altered details). There's no contradiction there.
 
If it's a Kirk's crew movie, they may well use the same cast even if it's not the same continuity, if that makes sense. Like how Logan ignored X-Men: Days of Future Past and only explicitly acknowledges the first film.

I would be very interested to see the current TOS crew with QT, set in prime universe, different sets, etc.

Sounds very good to me
 
I never thought I'd say this, but I'd rather have more Kelvin movies than DSC episodes. They are by far superior. I am really looking forward to the movies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MFB
I never thought I'd say this, but I'd rather have more Kelvin movies than DSC episodes. They are by far superior. I am really looking forward to the movies.

I feel the same way, but I wouldn't if not for Beyond. I didn't care for 2009 and Into Darkness much, but Beyond was enough to get me interested in future installments.

Discovery...well, I don't hate it at all. It just inspires a solid "meh." Nothing bad about it, nothing great about it. I never thought I could dislike a cast of characters as much as I did on DS9, but Discovery's characters are getting close. Burnham and Tyler are just...kinda there. Lorca was cool, be he evil and dead. Saru is cool, but doesn't do much. I don't really like much of the rest of them. Of course I'll watch DSC Season 2, but I'm not anticipating it at all.
 
I feel the same way, but I wouldn't if not for Beyond. I didn't care for 2009 and Into Darkness much, but Beyond was enough to get me interested in future

Same here. For me Beyond felt like Star Trek again.
 
Same here. For me Beyond felt like Star Trek again.
Why?
I always read people saying that but I, still, honestly don't understand what makes it more trek than the previous two, and I hardly ever read anyone elaborating tbh.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top