I watched "Author, Author" last night. Getting to the end of
Voyager. So, these observations are more keen because, other than
Nemesis, this was the last we saw of the 24th Century before
Picard premiered. Some nitpicking heckler's going to be like, "But what about TATV?!" and I'm going to give them a glare for splitting hair.
Anyway...
Holographic Rights. This is something the Judge addresses and says that while he cannot determine if The Doctor -- as a hologram -- qualifies for personhood based on one case, he extends protection of author rights to The Doctor and allows his holonovel
Photons Be Free to be recalled so it can be revised. It's realistic that Holographic Rights won't be an issue resolved in one case and that it would have to be kicked up to the Federation's equivalent of the Supreme Court,
but Voyager ends in 2378 and
Picard picks up in 2399. You'd think
Picard would've had a stance on Holographic Rights. It didn't. It leaves the issue alone. It has a stance on Androids, but not Holograms.
So, I have to look for clues. Unless I've missed something, I don't remember any mention of an EMH on the Titan. None of the Starfleet holograms seem fully sentient, but I would say that the holograms on La Sirena are. I'm going to guess that the banning on AI from 2385 to 2399 also froze the debate about Holographic Rights as well.
One thing that really rubbed me the wrong way was all the EMH Mark 1s in the mines that we saw at the end of "Author, Author". It feels wrong. It feels like 24th Century slavery. People who aren't recognized as people, doing all the menial work. "You're not a person, you're property!", to paraphrase the Dred Scott case. To me it's something that should've been at least touched upon in
Picard. If
Legacy ever gets greenlit, or there's something else late-24th/25th Century-related, hopefully it's addressed there. Maybe even
Prodigy.