I liked it, but it was incomplete, it had no epilogue. They should have gotten rid of that filler episode and have a 3-part endgame follow homestead.
Well, you're free to like any episode you wish, although I'll hold you to the tomato thing if I ever meet you in person.
RyuRoots:
Well, if we were to meet, I would say, put the tomato down my friend. It's just a fictional piece of work we are discussing here.
Dude, it's a joke. It's obviously a joke.
Anyway, I actually agree with you that cramming too much stuff is bad for a finale (even if I couldn't possibly disagree more about DS9's finale in that regard) but the problem is that it didn't cover ANYTHING important. DS9 brought closure to Sisko's arcs with being the Emissary and dealing with Dukat. TNG came full circle with Q judging humanity, but acting as something of a mentor. In Endgame, some Borg get "blowed up real good".
And I must disagree. I think that removing those personal stories when they arrive guts the ending of any value. In DS9, we see what happens to the whole crew as the war ends. In TNG, while AGT is largely a Picard story, we do get some good scenes showing how they've bonded and developed over the show, culminating in the poker game at the end. And VOY, whose entire purpose for seven years has been "to get home" has an end that can be described without omitting a single detail, as "they get home."
Yeah, I would have liked that version.
The Next Generation's finale was boring.
Also, Richard Whettestone's review: depressing but fair.So Janeway fulfills the promise she made to get her crew home in "Caretaker," the way she said she would in "The Q and the Grey" -- by perseverance, hard work and faith. Then she decides that's not good enough, and violates everything sacred to a Starfleet officer in order to find a shortcut. Imagine if Kirk decided that the lives of "his people" -- Spock in The Wrath of Khan, or his nephew in "Operation: Annihilate!" or Edith Keeler in "City on the Edge of Forever" -- took precedent over the best interests of Earth and the Federation. Imagine if Sisko had decided to stay in the alternate universe because his love for Jennifer mattered more to him than Earth or Bajor. Imagine if Picard had brought a Borg invasion fleet to Earth because he didn't want to risk the lives of his Enterprise crewmembers.
Captain Janeway has fulfilled the destiny she found in the Delta Quadrant. She has become Annorax, the crazed time traveler from "The Year of Hell" who rewrites galactic history to save his beloved. For what it's worth, Janeway succeeds on her first try, but it doesn't change the appalling significance of her actions. Had she failed -- had she been assimilated with knowledge from the future, and sent a Borg sphere to Earth in the process -- she could have been responsible for the deaths of billions. It's ironic that although she changes the timeline to save Seven of Nine, "Endgame" proves that Voyager can survive without Seven. They get home. They make scientific advances without Seven's Borg know-how. They lose only a couple of crewmembers a year -- not at all a bad record for a Starfleet vessel, if Kirk's and Picard's records are any indication. Yet it's not good enough for Janeway, who worries more about the personal happiness of a few close friends than the future of everyone in the Alpha Quadrant. Kathryn Janeway is unworthy of the uniform she wears. Star Trek's first female captain has ended her run by using theft, coercion and cheating, going so far as to risk destroying Earth to give herself a second chance.
...
Here is the moral of "Endgame," in case all those young males in the demographic audience are paying attention to something beyond the explosions, the Borg Queen's corset and Seven's breasts. Forget the lessons of "City on the Edge of Forever," forget the lessons of The Wrath of Khan, forget the lessons of First Contact -- your own happiness is all that matters, not the needs of the many, not the continuity of time. Forget the sacrifices made during the Dominion War, forget the suffering of the Bajorans during the Occupation, forget that the old enemy Klingons are now Federation allies -- those are things that could have been changed before they started, so they are meaningless. Forget the journey that is life, the necessary losses, the way sometimes sorrow leads to happiness later. Instead, seize the moment when you can, no matter who may pay later. Think of exploration only as a means to an end, and when you don't like what you find, change destiny. If something goes wrong in your own life or the lives of your closest friends, it's fine to destroy the lives of everyone else around you to try to fix it, because the end justifies the means.
This "Endgame" is forfeit. It's full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. But it fits, because practically since the beginning, Star Trek Voyager has not been about people making tough decisions for the greater good. It's been about people whose overriding issues are selfish -- can we get home, can we save our friends from the Alien Peril of the Week, can we make our retro holodeck programs so interesting that they excuse us from not stopping to learn and teach as we head through an unknown region of our galaxy. There's no yearning for exploration, no willingness to sacrifice for the greater good. Voyager is not real Star Trek.
(a) Like C/7
(b) Time Travel episodes are favourite
(c) Borg are brilliant.
![]()
(a) Like C/7
(b) Time Travel episodes are favourite
(c) Borg are brilliant.
![]()
I agree.
I like "Endgame" because besides C/7, Time Travel, the Borg, Janeway's morals and the journey home were all aspects and themes that ran through most of the entire series. It just seem natural to combine all those elements in the finale. The only complaint I do have is that it could have used an extra 10 to 15 mins too show a reunion with their loved ones upon returning home. It would have been very heart warming to see Naomi finally meet her father.
In that case, congrats, you're the suits'/TPTB's favorite sort of audience. Your admitted indifference to the spirit of the series helps keep it going, albeit in totally bastardized form.Well, I don't need any reviewer to tell why I should or should not like this or any other episode.
...
I liked it because I was entertained and that is the reason (the only reason) for which I watch Star Trek.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.