This made me so angry.
Like I know what their channel is about but this is so wrong.
Yeah, I'm a tad miffed too. Interesting video in some aspects, but angering in others... at least there's some ambivalence... (and to be fair, some of the channel's test items look genuinely compelling... but even down to the smartphone, there are ways to safely disassemble anything, and in ways to make reassembly look like they had never been taken apart to begin with... There's a literal "hack" joke somewhere, too...)
Any 9 year-old could take apart a machine with just as little skill... but since the kid wasn't old enough...
I suspect a Ms Pac-Man original kiosk that had the original Pac-Man side panels would be a bit rarer, older, and be a bit more valuable than what that young adult person was rationalizing just prior to smashing it up... A cursory search beyond the retro $150 stuff reveals the value is generally twice that of what he was saying (with one exception, for a unit that didn't look refurbished but looked like it was sitting next to a window all day and as such as badly faded), and I doubt prices skyrocketed since 2017 - back when they weren't all that common either.
The kid's video game is just glorified "cel animation in digital form"; a copy of that candy game, which is also just a glorified rehash of something made for a Commodore 64 some four centuries' earlier, only the blockiness had a more interesting look compared to ersatz hand-drawn stuff.
The use of Grand Theft Auto's font, if it wasn't intentional, leads to quite the double entendre.
He causally states there's no power, but he had it powered on earlier. So, guess how long the display unit can hold a potentially-lethal electric charge? But he said "rad" like how some teenagers might, so that means he won't be dumb enough to clumsily drop it... where doing so could cause an implosion - which would lead to worse things should the glass shatter... (Okay, at least he mentions "explosion", but he thinks it's the same television set you'd buy in 1981 - which is not quite the case, either... (but not too distant, too...) Vector-based games, much to my surprise when I'd read up on Tempest and it being the first game to use a color vector-based monitor rather than the typical raster-based, have monitor technology surprisingly more different too... amazing what is the same and where differences seep in...)
He also meant to say "burn-in effect", but it's all good...
For a cheap thrill, here's a neat example of those pesky laws of physics in action:
(Despite the interesting subject material, be on the lookout for more of that ADHDTV sped-up video technique, which more often than not feels unintentionally slower... Even colleges teach basic video composition for some degrees...)