• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

No respect for Spock?

I think you might be misremembering its point, Anji.

Actually, Anji is quite correct. Mister Boma crosses the line several times in terms of respect, to the point that Scotty steps in with McCoy in tow, to address that disrespect.
There's no doubt that Boma and others were disrespectful, but that wasn't the point of the episode nor was it to show how cool logic is superior to emotional gut reactions as Anji surmised.

Anji said:
Not to say that there is anything wrong with being human, but that perhaps being cool headed and logical is better. Remember the series was shot during a particularly sensitive time in America. A little more logic may have made the era easier to live through. Spock may have been Roddenberry's way of introducing that notion into the culture.

IIRC, Spock's logical approach to command fails at almost every turn. They are saved when Spock makes an impulsive "chance in a million it can work" decision. Which is why I included the pertinent dialog from the episode in my original post.

I would say that in most episodes were Spock logical appproach to a problem came head to head with Kirk or McCoy's more "emotional" one, it was the latter that usally saved the day. Roddenberry was promoting the "human way" more so than the "Vulcan way".
 
Last edited:
Actually, I never thought of it as an indictment of a "logical" approach to command as much as it was an indictment of Spock's failure as a leader. It's not his logic that's at fault; it's his assumption that the gargantuans would show respect to them once they demonstrated their superior weaponry.

I always point to this episode as to why Spock does not want command.
 
But its his logic that leads him to assume that the gargantuans would show respect after a show of superior technology. The message is that there's more to effective leadership and problem solving than just "logic".
 
“Mister” is not the traditional manner of addressing a superior officer.

It is traditional in the US and UK navies for officers below the grade of commander to be addressed as "mister."

I stand corrected.

Of course, Spock does hold the rank of Commander for most of the series, so this excuse doesn’t really apply.

It doesn't matter - since they started out calling the character "Mister" the producers and writers weren't going to change that just to satisfy military practice.
 
But its his logic that leads him to assume that the gargantuans would show respect after a show of superior technology. The message is that there's more to effective leadership and problem solving than just "logic".

This.
 
But its his logic that leads him to assume that the gargantuans would show respect after a show of superior technology. The message is that there's more to effective leadership and problem solving than just "logic".

I would beg to differ. Assumptions such as Spock's have no basis in logic. It's not logic that's the problem. It's Spock's assumption that is.
 
It might be important to note that Spock himself would usually self identify as "Mister Spock." And after that more often
by his position of first officer or science officer than as commander, he would only use his rank on fairly formal occasions. But it was the same with McCoy as doctor before lieutenant commander. And Scott himself was engineer before his rank.

Uhura was pretty much split between lieutenant and "Miss."

Chekov would often refer to Sulu, his rank superior, as mister.
 
But its his logic that leads him to assume that the gargantuans would show respect after a show of superior technology. The message is that there's more to effective leadership and problem solving than just "logic".

I would beg to differ. Assumptions such as Spock's have no basis in logic. It's not logic that's the problem. It's Spock's assumption that is.
Its a logical assumption. Superior technology will garner respect from primitives. More importantly, Spock believes it was logical and thats really all that matters since his decisions and thought process are whats being dicussed.

Galileo Seven said:
(Scott is still lying in the middle of the floor, working)
MCCOY: Well, Mister Spock, they didn't stay frightened very long, did they?
SPOCK: Most illogical reaction. We demonstrated our superior weapons. They should have fled.
MCCOY: You mean they should have respected us?
SPOCK: Of course.
MCCOY: Mister Spock, respect is a rational process. Did it ever occur to you they might react emotionally, with anger?
SPOCK: Doctor, I am not responsible for their unpredictability.
MCCOY: They were perfectly predictable to anyone with feeling. You might as well admit it, Mister Spock, your precious logic brought them down on us
 
It is traditional in the US and UK navies for officers below the grade of commander to be addressed as "mister."

I stand corrected.

Of course, Spock does hold the rank of Commander for most of the series, so this excuse doesn’t really apply.

It doesn't matter - since they started out calling the character "Mister" the producers and writers weren't going to change that just to satisfy military practice.

"Mister Spock" is also more pleasing to the ear than "Commander Spock." Most writers tend to differ to what is easier to say and more aural appealing than to the rigors of parlance or jargon.
 
The whole point to the Galileo Seven was to put Spock in a compromising position where logic failed and emotion must take over. Spock is forced into decisions that require an emotional response as well as a logical deduction.

That is a theme that continuously follows Spock throughout the show and something he eventually overcomes by Star Trek VI ("Logic is the beginning of wisdom, not the end"). I do not view The Galileo Seven as an episode where everyone was out to beat up Spock.

That episode goes to Patterns of Force.
 
I do think it's a fairly logical assumption. A child that touches a hot stove usually won't do it a second time.

They didn't get "burned." They were shown beams of light. The natives might not be impressed at all. Heck, they might have been had Spock chosen to actually shoot one of the big guys, but that wasn't the case.
 
I do think it's a fairly logical assumption. A child that touches a hot stove usually won't do it a second time.

They didn't get "burned." They were shown beams of light. The natives might not be impressed at all. Heck, they might have been had Spock chosen to actually shoot one of the big guys, but that wasn't the case.

Damn! Now I'm going to have to 'waste' fifty-one minutes re-watching The Galileo Seven. :techman:
 
Actually, iirc, one of the other guards in a shot prior to the scene where Spock tried to engender some "respect" may have indeed shot one of the aliens and it only made them angrier.
 
I'm watchin season 1 of TOS again and something I can't get is the lack of respect Spock gets from most of the crew on the Enterprise. He's a Senior officer and the ships 1st Officer but yet most crewman will refer to him by his name, or disregard most of commands, mock him or even try to get a compliment out of him. Uhura (in Charlie X), McCoy, and a few one shot characters are examples of this.

Why is he treated like this at times?
TV Shows like characters who can be ribbed and teased for comic payoff.

Can you site an example of someone ignoring his orders or calling him "Spock" with out a mister added? (Other than McCoy)

“Mister” is not the traditional manner of addressing a superior officer.
Starfleet is based on naval military traditions.
In the navy, male junior officers are addressed as Mister xxx.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top