• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

NFL Football 2009

Brett, come back next year. Don't think about it, just come back. You will dwell on that pass the rest of your living days if you don't. I know you were in pain and have been second guessed to just run out of bounds. Heck you could've slid or just sat down. You could've thrown it out of bounds but I'm digressing. Had your team not had 12 men on the field the dynamics of the play call that lead you into a passing situation would've been different.
I listened to an interview with a journalist who covers the Vikings, and he said that to a man everyone in that Vikings locker room wants Favre to come back. That's gotta make his decision even tougher

I wanted a Vikings/Colts SuperBowl cause I really like both QB's and the history of winning with each. If it hadn't been for turnovers the Saints wouldn't have hardly been in that game anyway.
I really am serious when I say I would have been perfectly happy with any combination of the four teams/QB's, but I think Favre and Manning would have been my favorite if pressed to pick one.

Saints are going to get beat by 10 in two weeks.
Go Colts!
If Garcon and Colley have another game like they just did, especially if Addai can run like that again.... New Orleans will be hard pressed to answer effectively.



What history of winning, exactly? Favre and Manning each have one Superbowl ring, right?
Yes, which means they are winners. But they also have great records overall, not to mention pretty much ruling the career offensive stats for QB's. Don't worry, Brady still has more Super Bowl wins, for now.
 
Jesus Christ.

Perry Fewell pantsed the Bears on their defensive coordinator job when he decided to go to the Giants, and they've done nothing since to find someone else. (I fully expect Marinelli to get the job, because they have no options.)

But, fuck, the team has gotten annihilated in its offensive coordinator search. Lovie Smith wanted Mike Martz, but Jerry Angelo overruled him (for some unknown reason; if you have Jay Cutler, wouldn't you want a guy like Martz calling plays?). Jeremy Bates went to Seattle. Charlie Weis decided to go see what he could do with Patriots West. Bengals QB coach Ken Zampese decided to stick with the Bengals. Clyde Christensen wasn't interested. The Packers wouldn't let QB coach Tom Clements interview for the job.

I'm not sure I blame any of them. While there are only 64 coordinator jobs in the NFL, all of which are highly paid and prestigious, there are only roughly, what, a thousand position coach jobs in the league? Probably less? And they're pretty well-paid, too. What maniac would leave his stable employment to take the coordinator job for a head coach who has to make the playoffs in the NFC North in order to save his job (a guy who will likely fail in the North, and thus will instead instigate a housecleaning), rather than wait a year for the entire coaching staff (and probably the management) to get axed and have a solid few years to work?

What history of winning, exactly? Favre and Manning each have one Superbowl ring, right?

Yes, Super Bowl rings are the indicator of a quarterback's talent. It's not his wide receivers, it's not his offensive line, it's not his running backs, it's not the defense, it's the quarterback who wins a Super Bowl. Wait, that means you'd argue that Jim McMahon is a better quarterback than Dan Marino.
 
Timby rant

From the Chicago Tribune:

stoogesstaff.gif
 
What history of winning, exactly? Favre and Manning each have one Superbowl ring, right?

Yes, Super Bowl rings are the indicator of a quarterback's talent. It's not his wide receivers, it's not his offensive line, it's not his running backs, it's not the defense, it's the quarterback who wins a Super Bowl. Wait, that means you'd argue that Jim McMahon is a better quarterback than Dan Marino.
Oh, I'd still argue that Manning is one of the best QBs ever, if not THE best. But it just struck a funny nerve when he said he wanted to see Favre vs Manning because of the "history of winning" between the two quarterbacks. They've each only won 1 ring, and Manning, as of last game, is 9-8 all time in the playoffs, while Favre has ended his last couple runs by singlehandledly tanking his team's hopes.

Great QBs, yes. "History of Winning", meh
 
So the Jets overachieve and they let go of four coaches in response?

Yes, Super Bowl rings are the indicator of a quarterback's talent. It's not his wide receivers, it's not his offensive line, it's not his running backs, it's not the defense, it's the quarterback who wins a Super Bowl. Wait, that means you'd argue that Jim McMahon is a better quarterback than Dan Marino.

Brad Johnson, Doug Williams, Mark Rypien, Jeff Hostetler and Trent Dilfer too!
 
Great QBs, yes. "History of Winning", meh
They may not have a lot of rings between them, but Favre has a regular season record of 180-104 and Manning has a record of 131-61. Their winning percentage is a combined 65% (about 68% for Manning and 63% for Favre). That's huge. So do they have a history of winning the Super Bowl? No. But do they have a history of winning? Absolutely.
 
I see that Neroon and some others were able to grasp what "history of winning" means. It's not just SB rings. Scout needs to broaden his viewpoint it seems.
As an inclusive resume these guys have won league records, division &/or conference titles on top of some SB rings.
 
Hard to argue with Peyton and the Colts' seven consecutive seasons with at least 12 wins. Even Tom Brady who, yes, DOES have 3 Super Bowl rings can't claim anything of the sort. It's not just the winning, it's the consistency of it.
 
Holy shit. Hue Jackson turned down an interview with the Bears to go become the Raiders' offensive coordinator. How bad do you have to be that a guy would rather work for a lame-duck coach and Al Fucking Davis than even interview in Chicago?

emot-suicide-1.gif


The fact that they didn't even make an offer to the one guy who actually seemed interested in the job -- Mike Martz -- makes me think that they have no clue. In point of fact, everything they've done since the Super Bowl makes me think they have no clue:

"Thomas Jones? We don't need that dude."

"Ron Rivera? Not important."

"Any coaches on either side of the ball? Who needs 'em? All right, guys, let's get out there and tell the press how we're really close to another Super Bowl."

I wonder if Lovie and Angelo know how bad the situation is or if Lovie is just staring motionless at a wall, waiting for church.

Then burning a timeout so he can stare some more.
 
Holy shit. Hue Jackson turned down an interview with the Bears to go become the Raiders' offensive coordinator. How bad do you have to be that a guy would rather work for a lame-duck coach and Al Fucking Davis than even interview in Chicago?

emot-suicide-1.gif


The fact that they didn't even make an offer to the one guy who actually seemed interested in the job -- Mike Martz -- makes me think that they have no clue. In point of fact, everything they've done since the Super Bowl makes me think they have no clue:

"Thomas Jones? We don't need that dude."

"Ron Rivera? Not important."

"Any coaches on either side of the ball? Who needs 'em? All right, guys, let's get out there and tell the press how we're really close to another Super Bowl."

I wonder if Lovie and Angelo know how bad the situation is or if Lovie is just staring motionless at a wall, waiting for church.

Then burning a timeout so he can stare some more.

I didn't think anyone wanted to work for Crypt Keeper Al Davis which would explain why Tom Cable still has a job. :wtf:

Then again, it makes perfect sense. No one in their right mind would volunteer to join a team whose coach has one year to fight for his job and clearly doesn't have the players, coaching staff or management to reasonably succeed. Bear down, Chicago Bears!
 
Alright, we have the best punt returner in the history of the world, let's make him a wide receiver.... :rolleyes:

Thomas Jones, Cedric Benson... :rolleyes:

Traded for a guy turned out to not be any better than Orton, who was never even given a chance to throw the ball anyway...

I expect Ogunleye, Peterson, Tinoisamoa, and Manning to all jump ship.

Gonna be a rough year next year.
 
Traded for a guy turned out to not be any better than Orton, who was never even given a chance to throw the ball anyway...

I wouldn't put the lion's share of the blame for the interceptions on Cutler. He had some boneheaded plays throughout the year, but between the assholes on the offensive line and not having anyone to throw to until Lovie decided to let Aromashodu come off the bench in Week 13, plus the retarded playcalling, he had no chance to succeed.

Cedric Benson... :rolleyes:

The Jones trade was idiotic, but Benson had to be let go. He was a locker room cancer, he couldn't stop getting in trouble with the law and he didn't perform. From 2005 - 2007, he was absolutely terrible. It made perfect sense for him to be released, for the same reason that Cincinnati only gave him a 2-year, $7 million deal -- he had a history of being not good at football.

I expect Ogunleye, Peterson, Tinoisamoa, and Manning to all jump ship.

Uh ... three of these guys would not be missed.

Gonna be a rough year next year.

That much is true.
 
I'm not even really sure how much those guys have been productive this year, but they're the only names I hear when I'm playing Madden. :lol:
 
Benson had a very productive year with the Bengals, and was a good candidate for Comeback Player of the Year.
Code:
Rush 301 	
YDS 1251 	
AVG 4.2 	
TD 6

And that was with missing three games due to injury. However, it surprised the jocks off everyone because of just what Timby said about him. From my limited perspective, the guy turned his life around and became something closer to the RB he was expected to be.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top