• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Newsweek picks the top 10 captain candidates

The other question is what is diversity based on? Is it the population of the country that produces it? The population of the Earth? The planet of origin of the fictional universe? The membership of the UFP?

If it's the USA, then African-Americans should only be 12% of the cast for example. Earth? Nearly 2-3rd of the population is from Asia. The UFP? Earth people should only be less than 1% of the crew..

Hopefully this new series has aliens, Asians and Asian aliens galore! :techman:

It also means the ratio between male and females on-board the ship should be approximately 1:1.
 
Star Trek still doesn't get an award for being diverse and inclusive because it wasn't.

Ah, that's where you are wrong. It did get an award for it's diversity.

Individually lots of the actors were nominated for awards by diversity organizations
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kor
Who cares? I only really care if the show is entertaining. Except for obviously the premier episode, I'm not going to watch Star Trek just because it's Star Trek, or it's diverse, or whatever. If it's not entertaining to me, I won't watch regardless of the composition of the crew.

And if it IS entertaining, I'll watch it regardless of the composition of the crew.
 
ou could say that about any old show when you compare it with modern standards. Also, not sure if you even watched TOS, because that definitely didn't have an entirely white main cast. For the 60s, a main cast depicting a black woman, an alien who looked like Satan, a Russian and a Japanese on American television was pretty unheard of.
Except for all those other shows with non whites and non Americans in their casts. Hogan's Heroes, Mission Impossible, McHale's Navy, I Spy, Julia, The Mod Squad, Daktari, Tarzan, High Chaparral, Ironside, Mannix, Land of the Giants...

When your show is renowned for being one that Dr. Martin Luther King himself called an achievement for black rights,
Link to that quote?

Uhura and Sulu were not part of the main cast. TOS only had three main characters, some fans thinking of the "big seven" doesn't make it true.
OTOH, the main cast was two thirds Jewish.
 
TOS: entire main cast was white
TNG: seven of nine main characters were white
DS9: five of eight were white
VOY: five of nine were white
ENT: five of seven were white

I don't see much diversity, the main cast was predominantly white, male and 100% of the characters were straight (even the android!). The myth that Star Trek was inclusive and diverse is pretty much bullshit.

*In Cinemasins Voice* That's racist. *ding*
 
Last edited:
Are you implying she's lying?
No, I've watched the story evolve over the decades from "what would Dr King do?" to "a phone call from Dr. King." to "a face to face with Dr. KIng". Stories often grow in the telling. So I don't think of it as a lie. I would like nothing more than for Dr. King to be a Trek fan, that would be cool beyond belief. But nothing I've read by Dr. King hiumself seems to indicate this was true. And as I pointed out, there are much better examples of African-Americans in non stereotypical roles than Uhura on Star Trek. Roles that predate Star Trek and are co-starring parts. Roles in shows much more successfull than Star Trek.
 
The franchise hasn't always been perfect but it's still been more diverse than a lot of shows.
 
Mulgrew, Picardo, McNeill , Phillips ,and Lien/Ryan: White (Ryan replaced Lien)
Beltran and Dawson: Hispanic
Russ: Black
Wang: Asian.

Making VOY's cast 44% non-white
 
Y'all never get tired of digging up this same tired argument, do you?

Group 1: (Sensitive, Politically-Correct, social justice warriors) "There should be a Tongan, a Native-American, someone from Borat's village, a Kalahari BushPERSON, and a member of ISIS who is also, preferably, a homosexual. If we could also have someone with Tourette's syndrome and another crewmwnber who chronically soils themselves...that would be a true repesentation of the various under-represented groups that Star Trek has the RESPONSIBILITY to portray."

Group 2: (People who like to pretend there's no bias in Hollywood or in society in general): "We really don't need all this diversity stuff forced upon us. Let's just see how things pan out. I like Asians and stuff...I guess, so I'm cool with diversity right? Star Trek is totally diverse anyway...I mean, c'mon Geordi was a black guy, am I right?? What's the big deal anyway? Why are we suddenly against WHITE PEOPLE??"

Everyone Else: (people who don't give a $hit one way or another) "Can we please just have well-written and well-acted characters? I'll buy just about anything if it's well done. And, I'd really do just about anything to stop this same tired, bottomless debate resurrected over and over and over and over again"

Can we just agree that this sums everything up and call it a day?
 
Last edited:
^
Agreed with you Vger23 1000%. However, we are a community that will argue over which feline actor portrayed Data's cat in which episode. Which is a good reason why Hollywood producers should NOT be listening to the Trek community. Just give me good stories set in the Star Trek universe that are not trying so hard to BE Star Trek. We already know what Star Trek is about, we don't need to be reminded and hit in the face with it every single damn episode. Some of the best shows (from any of the series) had nothing to do with the Star Trek universe, but simply the characters involved in the story.
 
Last edited:
Can we just agree that this sums everything up and call it a day?
Your "Everyone else" group reads pretty indistinguishably from Group 2. It's remarkable how many "just hire good people" casts end up remarkably lacking in diversity. I love Firefly, but for an American/Chinese universe it has a distinct lack of Chinese people. Asians are also missing from other Whedonverse properties or are stereotypes when they do appear. The unconscious bias of those making the new Trek show can be addressed perfectly well without becoming "PC social justice warriors" demanding a gay Horta captain. I would just appreciate a bit of deliberate thought on the issue when drawing up the new crew, who, being fictional and all, should be pretty easy to make diverse.
 
I would like to see different mentalities and neurological types portrayed in a positive way... i.e. things that are currently pathologized, such as autism spectrum conditions.

There is a slowly growing concept of neurodiversity in recent years, but it still does not have the mainstream acceptance or even the publicity of other forms of diversity. And it seems that most times when somebody of this kind of minority is portrayed in popular media, the basic idea is that there is something "wrong" with the character and not just "different."

Kor
 
Last edited:
There are always people who argue that shows or movies shouldn't worry about casting characters of a specific race and instead should just cast "the best actor for the role." It's interesting how often "the best actor for the role" turns out to be white.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top