Y'all never get tired of digging up this same tired argument, do you?
Group 1: (Sensitive, Politically-Correct, social justice warriors) "There should be a Tongan, a Native-American, someone from Borat's village, a Kalahari BushPERSON, and a member of ISIS who is also, preferably, a homosexual. If we could also have someone with Tourette's syndrome and another crewmwnber who chronically soils themselves...that would be a true repesentation of the various under-represented groups that Star Trek has the RESPONSIBILITY to portray."
Group 2: (People who like to pretend there's no bias in Hollywood or in society in general): "We really don't need all this diversity stuff forced upon us. Let's just see how things pan out. I like Asians and stuff...I guess, so I'm cool with diversity right? Star Trek is totally diverse anyway...I mean, c'mon Geordi was a black guy, am I right?? What's the big deal anyway? Why are we suddenly against WHITE PEOPLE??"
Everyone Else: (people who don't give a $hit one way or another) "Can we please just have well-written and well-acted characters? I'll buy just about anything if it's well done. And, I'd really do just about anything to stop this same tired, bottomless debate resurrected over and over and over and over again"
Can we just agree that this sums everything up and call it a day?