What I had different to you, is DS9 side by side with Voyager and a movie now and then.
A balanced diet.
It was backward times, so I didn't know about Enterprise until Voyager had finished, other wise I would consider that I had hope for the future too, but in truth, I couldn't imagine a world without Star Trek, so I didn't need hope.
I finally finished season 6. I was very disappointed. I found it extremely boring. It was a struggle to get through. I even went a few days without watching. The only episode I really enjoyed was Tinker Tenor Doctor Spy.
Here's hoping the final season is a good one. Though I've heard many times that Endgame sucks as a series finale. I am aware of the plot. In my opinion, it can't be as horrible as the Xena finale.
Fury was an unnecessary episode. As for Unimatrix Zero, I'm getting sick of the Borg. They feel over-used as the villains. The final scene did perk up my interest though.
I finally finished season 6. I was very disappointed. I found it extremely boring. It was a struggle to get through. I even went a few days without watching. The only episode I really enjoyed was Tinker Tenor Doctor Spy.
Here's hoping the final season is a good one. Though I've heard many times that Endgame sucks as a series finale. I am aware of the plot. In my opinion, it can't be as horrible as the Xena finale.
Fury was an unnecessary episode. As for Unimatrix Zero, I'm getting sick of the Borg. They feel over-used as the villains. The final scene did perk up my interest though.
I seriously considered throwing in the towel when I got to Memorial. .
In the middle of Season 5 currently. "Nothing Human" was great but also disappointing. An injured alien creature attaches itself to B'Elanna and the Doctor must consult medical research from infamous Cardassian exobiologist Crell Moset.
The first thing that disappointed me was that, again, the Cardassians can never be anything more than just "black" on a too-simplified spectrum of black and white, good versus evil. This episode could have tackled a more thrilling issue of racial bias against research.
Instead, we go down a less interesting path of "bias against evil research". Basically, the episode attempted to argue 'ethics' over using a cure that was gotten from what some believed to be torture. (it seems as though there's only rumors and here-say. But we know how reliable -that- can be from DS9's episode "Duet".)
The episode almost redeemed itself when the hologram Crell actually made excellent arguments in its defense. If you disagree with the method of research why consider it at all? Is letting a friend die justified because the method was researched improperly?
I was frustrated when the Doctor decided to delete the research and Crell. It was ignorant and sends the wrong message.
I believe that the Doctor retained what he learned from the experience and I'd wager that if this situation happened again, he would easily use that knowledge to save another person's life. But is that not the same as justifying the 'atrocities' of the research which founded the life saving end-result?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.