Hmmm... the word "rosebud" means something very different to me.
That isn't my point. To my way of thinking, that line, spoken at that point in the series mutes much of the power of the revelation at the end of "War Without End, II". You keep hearing references to Valen in rather hushed tones prior to that point. To hear Kosh speak the name in the context of allegedly meeting Sinclair drops too big of a hint, far too early in the story, imho.Well that name is only referred to in passing for most of the series and as I recall it wasn't until "Passing Through Gethsemane" that we found out roughly what he was about. To someone new coming into the series and starting with "The Gathering" that reference would be meaningless the first time round.
I'm not saying that the practice is devoid of value. As I often like to say jms has forgotten more about making a story than the rest of us will probably ever know. The problem for me is the huge impact that revelation brings in "WWE II". It still works with the line added to "The Gathering", but I don't feel it is nearly as effective.JMS often put HUGE hints right up in plain sight, but with out any context with which to determine their significance until much later.
For example...
When Draal calls out for Zathras in "The Long, Twilight Struggle"
How could he be sure that Kosh was going to be in the mood to shake appendages? Given how fussy the Vorlons are over leaving their encounter suits, theres always the chance Kosh may have decided to be respectful to the sacred one with a long Minbari style bow in which case what would assassin boy do with the skin-tab?As JMS himself said, "It's not a plot hole, it's a plot point." Kosh got poisoned because he came out of his encounter suit. He presented himself to Sinclair in his (sorta) real form, because he "knew" Sinclair pretty closely already and trusted him, and wanted to honour him. Unfortunately that also gave a sneaky Minbari renegade with a changeling net the perfect opportunity. Benefits of inside knowledge.
Which leaves me a bit confused as to what Vorlons really are.
(especially given poor Delenn's make-up
Are [the Vorlons] physical creatures or beings of light? Or both? Perhaps interchangeably, can they switch between their original form and their non corporeal form, perhaps?
Yes, that's a Vorlon...and there was a phyiscality to them, shown by the fact that it could strike out and hit things. It's not a ghost or anything of that nature, it can be hurt and killed.
and possibly what Dr Kyle "saw" and his readings were all just telepathic manipulation, much as Kosh telepathically manipulates the persons in the garden in to seeing what he wanted them to see when he left his suit.
Additionally, was Del Varner supposedly in league with the Shadows?
The nature of the Vorlons gives away too much about where the plot is going.
It is actually a bit weird. B5 has been a dead topic (more or less) for years and now suddenly it's like there's a new thread every other day. Someone go tell Joe we still care!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.