They're going down the path the Star Trek franchise has been going down since 1979. Good Luck as the fanbase fractures.


Public disclosure is definitely my number 1 want, number 2 being answer to Destiny and the signal in the CMBR.Well, good. I'd prefer a revival to a reboot. While the original movie was an unimaginative rehash of hackneyed 1970s ancient-astronauts tropes, the makers of the TV franchise built a rich and intricate universe that still has a lot of potential for future exploration.
My main wish is that the show will be set in a world where the Stargate program is public knowledge. In the later seasons, it got increasingly ridiculous that Earth had become this major player in galactic affairs yet the general public had no idea of it. And once you had a bunch of stories about political leaders and top scientists and business executives interacting with the SGC, there was no longer any good story reason to keep it secret from the public -- and it was morally reprehensible to have the US military and government doing all this big stuff in the galaxy without the voters having a say in what was done in their name. I've never liked the secrecy trope in sci-fi; it's an excuse to stick close to the real-world status quo, but the entire value of science fiction is in exploring the consequences of its speculative elements, the ways they transform human life and society. Secrecy stories are never about anything but keeping the secret; it's very limiting. There'd be so much more story potential if the Stargate program is publicly known now. Also, it'd be a good way to make the new show distinct from the old.
Dean Devlin and Roland Emmerich are EPs. I don’t know how I feel about that.
They probably just paid to use his name - much like Paramount did with GR in the later Trek feature films. (It wasn't until TNG that GR had control over the direction and stories for the then 'new' continuation of Star Trek.)That's odd, since Emmerich said just a year or so ago that he'd given up on Stargate because Amazon MGM and the TV producers held the rights and he and Devlin couldn't get their plans for a reboot off the ground. So if Gero's been working on this relaunch for 18 months already, as they said in the video, that makes it unlikely that Devlin & Emmerich were involved from the start.
Of course, "executive producer" these days encompasses any number of different categories of people who have nothing in common beyond a financial share in the show, so just because Devlin & Emmerich have EP credits doesn't mean they'll be participants in the creative process. It could just mean that Amazon MGM cut them in for a share of the profits as part of a deal to get them to drop their push for a competing reboot. Maybe that's what Emmerich meant when he said he'd given up on the reboot.

Disagree with the statement "(much like SNW feels like TNG/DS9 etc)."Brad Wright and Joe Mallozi are listed as "creative consultants/producers" so I'm sure it will feel like SG1/SGA, (much like SNW feels like TNG/DS9 etc).

They probably just paid to use his name - much like Paramount did with GR in the later Trek feature films.
(It wasn't until TNG that GR had control over the direction and stories for the then 'new' continuation of Star Trek.)
AP may have just figured having their names attached will help bring the original fanbase to give the new Stargate show (whatever form it takes) a look.
Brad Wright and Joe Mallozi are listed as "creative consultants/producers" so I'm sure it will feel like SG1/SGA, (much like SNW feels like TNG/DS9 etc).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.