• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

New Companion Rumour

That's what happens when you hire people who are too famous.

You just don't give ralph fiennes a 5 minute role.

They got themselves into that situation. To underutilize them would be a crime.

You could say the same about Dench though?
 
John Cleese at least is known for sketch comedy. Some of which are quite short, so he might only be on the screen for less than five minutes and get the job done perfectly.
 
I don't completely disagree, but that's where Moneypenny has always been, and at least this way MP is seen to be a competent agent who's been in the field (and jokes about shooting 007 apart she's really good in both Shanghai and the London shootout) and being the personal assistant of the head of MI6 is no mean feat. If anything I'd like them to drop Tanner and elevate Moneypenny into more of that kind of role, that would be good.

Part of my problem with Spectre, and if anything Moneypenny isn't the worst offender, is that all of Bond's support staff get shoehorned into the action in some way. The franchise needs stripping back, and fine if there's a way to insert M and co into the action, but don't do it for the sake of it. Really I just want Bond to get on with his mission after a quick bit of banter with Moneypenny, some hurumphing from M and after Q tells him to return his exploding underpants in one piece...

The early SPECTRE script that leaked clarified that Moneypenny wasn't M's personal assistant - but actually the Head Data Analyst for MI6, equivalent to Robinson in the Brosnan movies in a sense (Chief of Operations in contrast to Tanner's 'Chief of Staff').


Not quite - Yeoh's character would have been a cameo, in place of the Chinese secret service guy running the hotel in Hong Kong, who gets Bond a passport and a ticket to Cuba.

Earlier, Teri Hatcher's character in TND was originally meant to have been Natalya from Goldeneye...

The latter isn't quite true either from my understanding - the very early draft of TND (with villain Elliott Harmsway and girls Paris Harmsway and Sydney Wrench) references Natalya marrying a hockey player but it doesn't seem like they ever intended Natalya to be Paris.
 
You could say the same about Dench though?


Fair point. We never see her again in "Goldeneye" after the briefing though

After that she had quite a few scene in future movies.


TND- In the "situation room"

TWINE- Kidnapped

Die Another Day- Different settings

Casino Royale- Office and Bahamas to name a few

QOS- Different locations

Skyfall- She was practically a Bond girl
 
Dredging this up...

It's from the Radio Times so a step above Tabloid gossip and it would be nice to get someone different for a change, even if they're only around for a single series.

http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2016...-thakrar-join-doctor-who-as-the-new-companion

Now we really are getting Rakhee Thakrar as a companion, in Big Finish's Time War series with the eighth Doctor. The Time War is their prequel to the War Doctor audios, so I wonder if we might see Cardinal Ollistra in some capacity at some point.
 
John Cleese at least is known for sketch comedy. Some of which are quite short, so he might only be on the screen for less than five minutes and get the job done perfectly.

40 seconds.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
There was a City of Death novelization? Was it just 12 pages of plot and 100+ pages of trying to find new ways to describe The Doctor and Romana pointlessly wandering around Paris? Or was it just a 12-13 page book that repeated the line "Then, The Doctor and Romana walked around Paris a bit more" between every few paragraphs :lol:
 
There might have been a novel for every episode. I know I had a couple dozen of them back in the 80's

I think it was the Five Doctors novel when #5 said he had cosmic angst and Tegan replied "cosmic howmuch?"

For years I swore it was in the episode, then I got the DVD a few years ago.
 
There was a City of Death novelization? Was it just 12 pages of plot and 100+ pages of trying to find new ways to describe The Doctor and Romana pointlessly wandering around Paris? Or was it just a 12-13 page book that repeated the line "Then, The Doctor and Romana walked around Paris a bit more" between every few paragraphs :lol:

No, it's a hefty hardcover novel by James Goss. Came out... two years ago? I think it was two years ago.

There might have been a novel for every episode. I know I had a couple dozen of them back in the 80's.

At this point, everything from the original run is novelized except for Eric Saward's two Dalek stories.
 
At this point, everything from the original run is novelized except for Eric Saward's two Dalek stories.

What I don't remember, were there major differences in the novels vs the episodes?

Like a Star Trek movie vs it's corresponding novel, with all the unfilmed dialogue and whatnot.
 
No, it's a hefty hardcover novel by James Goss. Came out... two years ago? I think it was two years ago.



At this point, everything from the original run is novelized except for Eric Saward's two Dalek stories.

I have a box of about 50 novels (along with many hardcover books and DWM's from the 80's. Wonder how much they are worth these days. ;)
 
There was a City of Death novelization? Was it just 12 pages of plot and 100+ pages of trying to find new ways to describe The Doctor and Romana pointlessly wandering around Paris? Or was it just a 12-13 page book that repeated the line "Then, The Doctor and Romana walked around Paris a bit more" between every few paragraphs :lol:
Actually, a problem I had with the City of Death novelization is that the author tried too hard to imitate the Douglas Adams style of prose which in the end proves one thing: you shouldn't try to write like Douglas Adams unless you are Douglas Adams. And even he couldn't always pull it off.
 
What I don't remember, were there major differences in the novels vs the episodes?

Like a Star Trek movie vs it's corresponding novel, with all the unfilmed dialogue and whatnot.
It depended on the writer, mainly. I think those novelisations written by Terrence Dicks were largely straight from the script. Sometimes the novelisation was based on a script that was changed. The later releases were largely faithful to the episodes.

Sometimes the book is a significant departure. The novelisation of The Daleks, one of the first three released in the 70s, was written in the first person from the POV of Ian, and was written as the first meeting with the Doctor.
 
I was surprised when The Cave Monsters (novelization of The Silurians) embellished on the security officer's background by detailing an incident involving the IRA that got messy and resulted in the end of his military career. That is stuff the show itself would not have touched back then, and I'd be surprised if they addressed that sort of thing today.
 
What I don't remember, were there major differences in the novels vs the episodes?

"The Daleks" pretends "An Unearthly Child" never existed. (The opening of the book is homaged at the start of "An Adventure in Space & Time")

"Colony in Space" is renamed "The Doomsday Weapon" and acts as if it's Jo's first meeting with the Doctor.

"Frontier in Space" published as "The Space War" doesn't lead into "Planet of the Daleks" even though the two books were released only a month apart.

John Peel's* various Dalek story books have a lot of retroactive continuity references added.

Malcolm Hulke and Ian Marter's books are much more adult than most of the rest. (Until the last few years when pretty much all the books went more in-depth than the original stories; "Remembrance of the Daleks" being the ultimate expression of this.)

Donald Cotton's turned his three historicals into full-on comedies.

*Not that one.
 
It depended on the writer, mainly. I think those novelisations written by Terrence Dicks were largely straight from the script. Sometimes the novelisation was based on a script that was changed. The later releases were largely faithful to the episodes.

Sometimes the book is a significant departure. The novelisation of The Daleks, one of the first three released in the 70s, was written in the first person from the POV of Ian, and was written as the first meeting with the Doctor.

"The Daleks" pretends "An Unearthly Child" never existed. (The opening of the book is homaged at the start of "An Adventure in Space & Time")

"Colony in Space" is renamed "The Doomsday Weapon" and acts as if it's Jo's first meeting with the Doctor.

"Frontier in Space" published as "The Space War" doesn't lead into "Planet of the Daleks" even though the two books were released only a month apart.

John Peel's* various Dalek story books have a lot of retroactive continuity references added.

Malcolm Hulke and Ian Marter's books are much more adult than most of the rest. (Until the last few years when pretty much all the books went more in-depth than the original stories; "Remembrance of the Daleks" being the ultimate expression of this.)

Donald Cotton's turned his three historicals into full-on comedies.

*Not that one.

Thanks guys. It's been nigh on 30 years since I had those books.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top