Orci and Kurtzman have proven themselves to be prolific and capable of doing multiple projects.Can't they like, focus on just doing the second movie first.
No guarantee that an animated series will be based in any previous established continuity, IMO...An animated series based on the Trek 09 has little interest for me.
That seems like the most commercial approach, with the characters of course animated to look like Pine and Quinto. I suppose I could adapt to other voice actors doing the roles, but damn, it's going to be hard to find a stand-in for Quinto.It'll be in the 23rd century and more than likely will focus on Kirk/Spock.
Orci and Kurtzman have proven themselves to be prolific and capable of doing multiple projects.Can't they like, focus on just doing the second movie first.
If the only objection is that they can't use the Abrams timeline (and why would that be the case?), that's no serious objection. The series can be written without any definite reference to what continuity they are in, certainly nothing the casual viewer would notice. Let's say the gang visits Vulcan. Who's to say whether it's the original Vulcan or the new colony, renamed Vulcan? It doesn't even need to be discussed in the story.A project along these lines might just run smack into that division of the franchise, i.e., you're doing something on television, you use the previously established timeline. TV is TV, movies is movies, and, in this case, ne'er the twain shall meet.
A project along these lines might just run smack into that division of the franchise, i.e., you're doing something on television, you use the previously established timeline. TV is TV, movies is movies, and, in this case, ne'er the twain shall meet.
So, Captain Robert April, the last time you said something almost identical, it turned out you didn't have any evidence to back up your narrative on how CBS and Paramount operate the Star Trek franchise. That was three weeks ago, exactly. Has anything changed? Found any sources to back up your narrative?
...
I always fancied a cartoon featuring the second 5-year mission set after TMP. I loved the look of the ship, the more alien crew, and the level of attention the writers paid to detail with that big budget. If the uniforms could be tailored a bit better - add some shoulder pads, some decent boots, cooler looking fabric etc, I think they could have had some legs....
So, Captain Robert April, the last time you said something almost identical, it turned out you didn't have any evidence to back up your narrative on how CBS and Paramount operate the Star Trek franchise. That was three weeks ago, exactly. Has anything changed? Found any sources to back up your narrative?
Unless someone has a verifiable source on it.
While it's true that the rights were not divided along fictional lines, CBS did become the license holder for Star Trek in 2006 and Paramount was only able to use the various Star Trek characters (and other assorted trappings) for Star Trek XI by paying a licensing fee.Unless someone has a verifiable source on it.
The rights were not divided along fictional lines (i.e. by "universe") and no one had to pay anyone anything to get permission to use Original Spock (and other assorted trappings) in their movie.
CBS are free to place a series in any setting they please, including one as yet unknown to us. Notwithstanding, (and with or without Orci/Kurtzman) I wouldn't anticipate an animated series aimed at middle-aged men.
However immature they may be.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.