Human enemies? Please be Doctor Smith.
Netflix greenlights new "Lost in Space"
- Thread starter safarial
- Start date
I meant that if they just kept it as the Robinsons in space alone. If they had the Robinsons get lost with a group of Colonists or other scientists or something (Which it would seem according to the synopsis posted above may be in fact what happens.) then it would make more sense to me....If they stuck strictly with how the original played out, I wouldn't have liked it, If they altered some aspects of the premise of the show, I'd give it a shot....thats all I was saying.
Maybe in 2047 with all the advances in medicine and real time access to info you only need about as much training to become a doctor as a modern day CNA does today. (probably not though) I'm sure they'll really let us know every 5 minutes what a genius she is....on the other side....How many anime series have Mecha pilots and other people in leadership positions at crazy young ages? I think it's just a manifestation of our society being obsessed with youth and being young.
You know, it's bad enough when non-writers throw this "laziness" charge at writers who write about stuff they don't like.
Sheesh.
It's a lazy criticism.
[QUOTE="Christopher, post: 11777426, member: 295"
Also not crazy about making him a combat veteran rather than a professor and a man of peace. It's as if they're deliberately making every character the exact opposite of what they were originally. [/QUOTE]
That could be an American marketing decision there. Don't forget we supposedly preferred sorcerer's stones to philosopher's ones for the book and film.
Also not crazy about making him a combat veteran rather than a professor and a man of peace. It's as if they're deliberately making every character the exact opposite of what they were originally. [/QUOTE]
That could be an American marketing decision there. Don't forget we supposedly preferred sorcerer's stones to philosopher's ones for the book and film.
Well, that was based on the assumption that American kids would be unfamiliar with the legend of the Philosopher's Stone and would find the title misleading. And that's just changing a title to make it clearer. It doesn't change anything about the actual content of the story or characters. This would be more like, say, turning Harry into a Muggle-born overachieving genius, Hermione into a Quidditch champion, and Ron into a Slytherin bully.
I imagine we are getting combat veteran instead of professor because of the required action scenes nowadays in Sci fi shows. Remind me of the pointless action scenes with phasers found in many Enterprise episodes, and Archer constantly getting captured in the first two seasons.
I will never understand why anyone who has heard of replicators has a problem with this. As long as they have energy (available from any of billions of stars) and raw materials (available from any of trillions of asteroids), they can replenish their supply of just about anything.
"Nowadays?" Come on. How many totally gratuitous fistfights did Captain Kirk get into?
Besides, if they need a soldier to carry action scenes, then Major Don West could've filled that role.
Kirk got captured on a regular basis, too.
It sounds like Don West is the resident scoundrel in this version, which would seem to render Smith superfluous.
The shadow of Harris' screaming, prancing, scheming, bug eyed Smith is large and is one of the reasons Lost in Space has been harshly criticized for 50 years. That's all the annals of popular culture remembers of the Smith character. The problem of creating a new version was apparent in the dreary 1998 remake movie, where Gary Oldman tried to be scheming, but every ounce of the actor was more concerned with being the Anti-Harris than a fresh version of the character. I doubt any new actor would find it any less difficult to be Smith, but escape the complete actor-to-character bond Harris created.
But by omitting the character completely you risk leaving out part of the reason the show was successful in the first place.
I just have a hard time visualizing how Will and the Robot will function without Smith to complete the triad. I can understand the trepidation but there has to be a way to make it work. Like I was saying elsewhere, give Smith a slow redemption arc or something.
Sure, but it's not just him. If these character descriptions are accurate, then they have very little in common with the originals beyond names, sexes, and ages. So it's a completely different dynamic with or without a Smith. It's not trying to succeed by replicating the original dynamic, but apparently by reacting against its perceived failings, even if that means throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
I don't know, while a remake should put its own stamp on stuff, part of the fun is seeing familiar faces in new adventures and circumstances, with similarities. I mean, Spider-Man is essentially the same character throughout his franchise and a lot of the beats run parallel. Green Goblin is is worst enemy, although the methods of their feud may change depending on the adaptation. In the main comics, Spidey and Mary Jane were a married couple, while the Ultimate series made them high school sweethearts to make the relationship work with the characters as minors. The Ninja Turtles franchise has run the gauntlet from dark and gritty (the Mirage comics) to cartoony (the '80s show and Bay movies) to a light-hearted setting that can do drama (the '03 and '12 shows), to dark but not without a positive light (TMNT). But, despite the different tones, the core characters are essentially the same. People come back to stuff like this because they love these characters. Change it too much and a major touchstone is lost.
Granted, I've only seen a handful of the original Lost in Space episodes, but from my memory, Dr. Smith was the most distinct character on the series. Will was pretty well-defined and Penny had her moments, and the Robot was cool, but the other characters were really flat. So, they're cutting out a key character and one of the few that worked to what point? (I will say, though, that fleshing out the rest of the cast does sound like an improvement for the better.)
Yes, that's exactly why this seems odd to me. If these descriptions are real, then it's just using the names and nothing else. It's sort of like the new MacGyver remake -- Mac aside, the show reuses character and institution names from the original for people and things that bear no resemblance to their namesakes. Except there it just seems like random reassignments. In this case, it's more like deliberate opposition. As I said, I can understand trying to balance out the problems with the original, but they seem to have forgotten to keep the more viable aspects.
That's only because Smith was the breakout character and the writers tended to ignore the others almost completely. If you look at the early first season, when it was more of an ensemble show, the other characters have more substance.
Similar threads
- Locked
