All unexpected "depth" redoubtably describes is how further we can bury a knife into him.
All unexpected "depth" redoubtably describes is how further we can bury a knife into him.
If being annoying is grounds for murder, then more than half of Treks fanbase should have been dead 3x over. lol
Good point.Neelix was suppose to be a 'living example' of a person in the Delta Quadrant, THEREFORE, he is dumber than humans and irritating. He also has many attributes; loving, cooking, being communicative, and he is a self-made engineer. They didn't have to discard him because he more than earned his stay by just being himself. Leaving Voyager is something the miners on the asteroid wanted. It's also healthy to kill-off the minor characters at the end. It gives the major characters a more prestigious finality.
^ This is an excellent point.
I also feel that Tuvok pretty accurately portrayed the negative sentiments about Neelix's lack of sophistication as mirrored by the sentiments seen here. Neelix was obviously created to appeal to a younger part of the Trek audience, much in the way Wesley and Jake were in the other series. He is the Jar Jar Binks of the franchise.
No reason to kill him though. In this case torture would be acceptable, as long as we get to watch.
I don't think Quark is the right comparison.^ This is an excellent point.
I also feel that Tuvok pretty accurately portrayed the negative sentiments about Neelix's lack of sophistication as mirrored by the sentiments seen here. Neelix was obviously created to appeal to a younger part of the Trek audience, much in the way Wesley and Jake were in the other series. He is the Jar Jar Binks of the franchise.
No reason to kill him though. In this case torture would be acceptable, as long as we get to watch.
I disagree. I think he was meant to be more like Quark or Phlox, the strange, genial alien outsider among the crew.
(in fact, a magazine's description of him before the series' debut put it as "think Quark with different hair," or something close to that.
I don't think he was meant to be a Binks/Wesley type character.
I don't think Quark is the right comparison.^ This is an excellent point.
I also feel that Tuvok pretty accurately portrayed the negative sentiments about Neelix's lack of sophistication as mirrored by the sentiments seen here. Neelix was obviously created to appeal to a younger part of the Trek audience, much in the way Wesley and Jake were in the other series. He is the Jar Jar Binks of the franchise.
No reason to kill him though. In this case torture would be acceptable, as long as we get to watch.
I disagree. I think he was meant to be more like Quark or Phlox, the strange, genial alien outsider among the crew.
(in fact, a magazine's description of him before the series' debut put it as "think Quark with different hair," or something close to that.
I don't think he was meant to be a Binks/Wesley type character.
Quark was smart and had money.
His motivation was greed.
Neelix was dumb and dirt poor, dude was homeless and living in garbage upon meeting him.
Neelix' motivation was the fear of being homeless and hungry again.
If anything Neelix was more like Rom.
Someone who at first was a joke but as the character grows, the more his skills come to the surface.
Plus, Quark's life is by choice and culture.
Neelix' life isn't by choice or culture, he was forced into the life he has.
I disagree.I don't think Quark is the right comparison.I disagree. I think he was meant to be more like Quark or Phlox, the strange, genial alien outsider among the crew.
(in fact, a magazine's description of him before the series' debut put it as "think Quark with different hair," or something close to that.
I don't think he was meant to be a Binks/Wesley type character.
Quark was smart and had money.
His motivation was greed.
Neelix was dumb and dirt poor, dude was homeless and living in garbage upon meeting him.
Neelix' motivation was the fear of being homeless and hungry again.
If anything Neelix was more like Rom.
Someone who at first was a joke but as the character grows, the more his skills come to the surface.
Plus, Quark's life is by choice and culture.
Neelix' life isn't by choice or culture, he was forced into the life he has.
I don't necessarily disagree with your observations, but you're looking at it from an in-universe perspective.
I meant that from a series design perspective, Neelix was meant to be like a Quark-type character, not that their psychology or motivations would be similar.
I disagree.I don't think Quark is the right comparison.
Quark was smart and had money.
His motivation was greed.
Neelix was dumb and dirt poor, dude was homeless and living in garbage upon meeting him.
Neelix' motivation was the fear of being homeless and hungry again.
If anything Neelix was more like Rom.
Someone who at first was a joke but as the character grows, the more his skills come to the surface.
Plus, Quark's life is by choice and culture.
Neelix' life isn't by choice or culture, he was forced into the life he has.
I don't necessarily disagree with your observations, but you're looking at it from an in-universe perspective.
I meant that from a series design perspective, Neelix was meant to be like a Quark-type character, not that their psychology or motivations would be similar.
I think the only reason we compare him to Quark in design or status is because there has never been a full alien civilian character in the main cast in a Trek series before Quark. Since we have no other reference, we compare him to the only one we have. The same reason everyone compares Phlox to Neelix just because their make-up design is similar.
Guinan shares all those similarities too.I disagree.I don't necessarily disagree with your observations, but you're looking at it from an in-universe perspective.
I meant that from a series design perspective, Neelix was meant to be like a Quark-type character, not that their psychology or motivations would be similar.
I think the only reason we compare him to Quark in design or status is because there has never been a full alien civilian character in the main cast in a Trek series before Quark. Since we have no other reference, we compare him to the only one we have. The same reason everyone compares Phlox to Neelix just because their make-up design is similar.
Quark and Neelix actually have a lot of similarities
-They're both involved in food service
-they're both supposed to be very resourceful with a lot of connections, some shady
-they're both "non-warrior"(not just that they're civilians but their characters just aren't fighter-types) among crews of mostly warriors
-they're both outgoing people persons
-and yes, they're both alien civilians
that's actually a lot of similarities, I think you're deliberately avoiding how close the two characters are, it's just that Quark was pulled off a lot better
Guinan shares all those similarities too.I disagree.
I think the only reason we compare him to Quark in design or status is because there has never been a full alien civilian character in the main cast in a Trek series before Quark. Since we have no other reference, we compare him to the only one we have. The same reason everyone compares Phlox to Neelix just because their make-up design is similar.
Quark and Neelix actually have a lot of similarities
-They're both involved in food service
-they're both supposed to be very resourceful with a lot of connections, some shady
-they're both "non-warrior"(not just that they're civilians but their characters just aren't fighter-types) among crews of mostly warriors
-they're both outgoing people persons
-and yes, they're both alien civilians
that's actually a lot of similarities, I think you're deliberately avoiding how close the two characters are, it's just that Quark was pulled off a lot better
So if anything, Quark & Neelix are Guinian type characters.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.