Of course, these are also precisely the reasons why somebody would be prepared to make false sexual abuse accusations against a rich and powerful person.
Moreover, whether the people involved are rich and famous or not, time and time again false allegations are much more damaging to the accused than the accuser. Especially when children are involved.
This is the type of reasoning I don't understand. First, there is the assumption that all unproven allegations are false.
I did not make any such assertion or assumption.
I also strongly disagree that it is the accused who is damaged when charges are considered unfounded. How? They go on living their lives, while the one making the allegations is now considered a liar by their peers and an unreliable witness in future legal cases.
I think you're massively downplaying the impact a false abuse allegation has. Usually careers, families, relationships and reputations are in tatters. And it is rarely a case of simply getting on with their lives afterwards, even false allegations haunt people for the rest of their lives.
Sexual abuse is rarely "proven" in court unless there were pictures. People can go to prison for life for having child porn on their computer, but have a real child claim they were touched and you will almost never see a conviction.
This is because children are considered easily manipulated, an idea was planted in their heads, an adult around them was using them to try to get back at another adult, etc. If a period of time lapsed between the alleged event and the actual charge, it can be said that it must not have been very important or the child would have told someone right away, or that the story had changed over the months/years.
There is a difference between an unproven allegation and a false allegation. It's just hard to recognize this in any given case.![]()
While I accept and agree to a point with what you're saying, this is all getting rather off topic and I'm not really interested into getting into a debate about the 'rights' and 'wrongs' of how we handle child sexual abuse allegations - not something I really want to dwell on on a Star Trek BBS.

Suffice to say, if I remember correctly the child at the centre of the initial Michael Jackson abuse allegations refused to testify. In the second case Jackson was found not guilty on all charges. Beyond that, nobody knows what happened, but you're entitled to your opinion of the man ...