To to be clear, this was posted in jest. I certainly know of no such letter.
Sincerely,
Bill
That's wonderful!
To to be clear, this was posted in jest. I certainly know of no such letter.
Sincerely,
Bill
Which is wonderful, the content of the "letter" or the fact I'm clarifying it's just a stupid joke on my part?
It appears that Richard Taylor mistook the model as having been made for Phase II and disposed of it. Consequently, when Roddenberry contacted Bob Abel to get the model back, Abel was unable to locate it.
It appears that Richard Taylor mistook the model as having been made for Phase II and disposed of it. Consequently, when Roddenberry contacted Bob Abel to get the model back, Abel was unable to locate it.
So one of the guys involved in this new website http://projectenterprise.space actually THREW OUT the original 33 inch Enterprise model?
!!!
Taylor was the last person I can find to have had physical possession of the model, and he didn't seem to realize what he had. Responsibility for the safety of the model was given to Abel, but Taylor was the last person to see it and didn't know what it actually was. Roddenberry knew who had it, and was the only person who really could have held anyone accountable for it... and expressed his displeasure over the situation with Abel. At the time it wasn't the type of artifact that we'd consider it today (being the original, first model of the Enterprise).So one of the guys involved in this new website http://projectenterprise.space actually THREW OUT the original 33 inch Enterprise model?
!!!
The fact that Rod Roddenberry has had fans hold him responsible via that story is pretty sad. This set of photos represents the only access to the model Roddenberry Jr. would have had before it was lost...If that is the case, I'd prefer the other legend of the model's fate - that it met its end at the bottom of the Roddenberry family swimming pool.![]()
A new website is opening tomorrow. If you click on the arrow there is some information. http://projectenterprise.space/
It says...
"The Magicam / Paramount team of Jim Dow, Richard Taylor and Paul Olsen, who designed and built the original Starship Enterprise..."
I thought Jefferies pretty much designed it and Andrew Probert changed the surface details (mostly)
Am I wrong?
Signed;
Confused![]()
Then I discovered...
D) Is starting a website tomorrow http://projectenterprise.space/
that claims "The Magicam / Paramount team of Jim Dow, Richard Taylor and Paul Olsen, who designed and built the original Starship Enterprise"
Then I discovered...
D) Is starting a website tomorrow http://projectenterprise.space/
that claims "The Magicam / Paramount team of Jim Dow, Richard Taylor and Paul Olsen, who designed and built the original Starship Enterprise"
That's Daren Dochterman's Enterprise, isn't it?
Then I discovered...
D) Is starting a website tomorrow http://projectenterprise.space/
that claims "The Magicam / Paramount team of Jim Dow, Richard Taylor and Paul Olsen, who designed and built the original Starship Enterprise"
That's Daren Dochterman's Enterprise, isn't it?
Think so. Dochterman did a great job on it if it is.
I believe that several CG artists contributed to the ST:TMP Enterprise computer model, among them Lee Stringer.
I think Harvey and Shaw should join forces to debunk the myths about the Enterprise model for Harvey's Star Trek Fact Check blog.
Which again begs the question - why are Taylor & Company doing this? Unless it's sitting in an Afghan cave or Iraqi museum somewhere, the original TMP model (while in desperate need of a Smithsonian-level restoration) is in no danger of ending up like the TOS 33 incher. Studio scale replicas can be made for far cheaper (and with much better tech, like LEDs and even built-in sound fx) than what these three were asking for (what was it, three million?). Dochterman, Richter, Bailey and others have crafted CG replicas indistinguishable from the real thing at HD that could easily be pressed into onscreen service anytime Paramount wants to cough up the cash. I just don't get it...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.