Your opinion is noted without comment.Sorry but I loathe religion, one less building that hangs to that misguided self righteous belief no matter what the historical significance isn't a bad thing.
Your opinion is noted without comment.Sorry but I loathe religion, one less building that hangs to that misguided self righteous belief no matter what the historical significance isn't a bad thing.
You know, there are a lot of different people from different backgrounds posting in this thread. Some who rarely agree on anything. Some are religious and some (like myself) are not. But they've all managed to be respectful and realize that this is a situation of importance and history and didn't come in to take a trolling shot across the bow. Until you.Sorry but I loathe religion, one less building that hangs to that misguided self righteous belief no matter what the historical significance isn't a bad thing.
They've already received about €500,000,000 in pledges for the restoration. Money will not be the problem.I heard a blurb on NPR about Queen Elizabeth expressing her grief over this fire. Comparisons are being made with the 1992 Windsor Castle fire and subsequent restoration. The work was done so well that visitors can't tell there ever was a fire.
Kor
Wow you're a sad sack.Sorry but I loathe religion, one less building that hangs to that misguided self righteous belief no matter what the historical significance isn't a bad thing.
I suggest you take LoB's warning and back off comments like this. We stand to learn a lot from the past. Or should we disregard Stonehenge, the Pyramids (all of them) or the Parthenon? They are all products of different religions...? Before you bring it up, saying they are relics of a defunct faith is bull. Catholic church was pretty much a different institute when Norte Dame was built. Celebrating Christmas was considered immoral for a long time, which is part of the reason why we have the term "X-mas".I mean the religion itself, not the followers.
This is like pouring lemon juice into someone's wound while saying "You got hurt because of your religious beliefs." It seems you're unable to see just how callous it was to come in here and attempt some kind of panning on religion. This is not about religion. This is about a cherished historical relic, a long standing icon of France. If you have any dignity at all, you'd apologize and delete your post.I mean the religion itself, not the followers.
I've been wondering about that as well. What kind of liability does a construction company take on when working on a priceless historical structure? Does the French government have an insurance policy on the building? I expect not--nobody would want to insure it, for the replacement cost would be astronomical. However, if a company is tasked to do work on something like this, they must have SOME kind of accountability, some contractual obligation of being financially bound. Because otherwise, you'd have insufficient oversight and impetus to prevent some untrained or uncaring worker doing something terribly stupid, like starting a fire with a lit cigarette butt. I'd expect that with the immense costs involved, there would be so much precaution. I'd expect some official on-site monitoring all renovation activity. You could rig up wireless cameras for the express purposes of documenting the effort, but also to ensure that workers do their utmost to be careful--because if they're not, they'll be held accountable.I wonder how/if insurance would work in a situation like this.
Kor
In the bible it says that God has righteousness. But the followers are told to seek the Kingdom of God and His righteousness.I mean the religion itself, not the followers.
Just a word or two of caution - it is never good to feed a troll.In the bible it says that God has righteousness. But the followers are told to seek the Kingdom of God and His righteousness.
But I'm not sure how you could feel that an entire religion is self righteous, as every church or congregation or Sunday pancake breakfast is made up of, dozens or millions of individuals.
Only the Catholic Church has one top leader and there are millions of Catholics that don't follow everything that he says.
Maybe you think the Pope is self righteous.
Yep, because it ends up amounting to:Just a word or two of caution - it is never good to feed a troll.
I've been wondering about that as well. What kind of liability does a construction company take on when working on a priceless historical structure? Does the French government have an insurance policy on the building? I expect not--nobody would want to insure it, for the replacement cost would be astronomical. However, if a company is tasked to do work on something like this, they must have SOME kind of accountability, some contractual obligation of being financially bound. Because otherwise, you'd have insufficient oversight and impetus to prevent some untrained or uncaring worker doing something terribly stupid, like starting a fire with a lit cigarette butt. I'd expect that with the immense costs involved, there would be so much precaution. I'd expect some official on-site monitoring all renovation activity. You could rig up wireless cameras for the express purposes of documenting the effort, but also to ensure that workers do their utmost to be careful--because if they're not, they'll be held accountable.
These days we see mistakes made in critical areas, where a trusted company gets negligent and then finally something goes wrong. Like Boeing and its 737 Max series aircraft. So it could be the construction company got lax and didn't exercise proper oversight on the operation. Or someone experienced made a choice that was just wrong and they didn't realize it, like plugging in equipment that makes a large draw on power, but is using the old wiring in the building instead of bothering to set up an external feed... then that wiring overheats, catches fire. If it was something utterly tragically stupid like a flung cigarette butt not fully extinguished, it would be hard to prove because I imagine that the material would've been vaporized in the extreme heat. They do know it started at the base of the spire. So everyone on the crew will be checked for everything they did and when they did it. No doubt there will be interrogations. Anyway, a lot to speculate on, so it makes sense to give things time before getting fixed on any conclusions.Oh wow!
Could you imagine being the guy that is sitting home today thinking about how he tossed his cigarette butt into the trash can under the step ladder?
I wonder how long it will take them to discover the cause?
Maybe it was as simple as a shorted out wire.
I'm sure there is old growth somewhere in the world that can be used, but wood today is structurally different due to our environment. That's one of the reasons reclaimed wood is so popular and valuable right now.
True. But I'm thinking what might be more expedient is to provide a metal alloy framework and then cover with a genuine wood veneer. This is an area that isn't shown to the public, so there's no real need to be 100% original. And the need for better resistance to fire is even more great, considering the vulnerability of solid wood.I'm sure there is old growth somewhere in the world that can be used, but wood today is structurally different due to our environment. That's one of the reasons reclaimed wood is so popular and valuable right now.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.