Sounds like he hyped himself up too much. I don't think anyone specifically criticized him for that movie.
Spoilers Marvel Cinematic Universe spoiler-heavy speculation thread
- Thread starter bbjeg
- Start date
It doesn't really do anything to disabuse the notion that actors are all a bunch of snowflakes.
If you can't handle criticism get a different job.
If you can't handle criticism get a different job.
I would've liked Cage, Iron Fist and Shang Chi to have been back there in the 70s with him (assuming this is the case). I imagine they will be going with extended lifespan so they can get away with having Blade back in the day and in the modern MCU. I wouldn't mind an animated MCU 197X or something presented as a What If? or something to that effect.
Can we get Mahershala Ali in that overcoat and wraparound glasses?
IIRC Joe Carnaghan pitched a 70s-set Daredevil film. I think it was to Fox shortly before they lost the rights.
More than enough to qualify. Two decades or so is not an uncommon time frame for period pieces -- Hogan's Heroes, Happy Days, M*A*S*H, That '70s Show, etc. After all, it takes about that long for someone to mature from their formative years to the point where they've established themselves as writers or filmmakers and can tell stories about the things that shaped them in their formative years.
Heck, George Lucas's American Grafitti is very much a period piece, but it's set only 11 years before its release.
I get reading critical reviews of things you are a part of can suck and hit you hard, but the dude also injected himself with enough PEDs to kill a horse. I'd be hesitant blaming emotional swings on professional critics saying a movie you were in wasn't very good when you have that as a contributing factor.
That sucks. The movie is awful, but I don't blame any of the actors. He's wrong about the movie being hated for nebulous "reasons" and not its overall quality though, the vast majority of people that hate Eternals, myself included, just think its a terrible movie.
I actually enjoyed the movie. I thought it was better than the usual MCU schlock. It's a pity that Nanjiani couldn't handle its unpopularity.
I don’t think anything gets cut. More I reckon fewer additions to the slate will be announced and what is currently in the pipeline gets finished/released over a longer timescale
He actually said it months ago and people seemed to forget until he said it again yesterday.
No Eternals 2. No Armor Wars. Probably no Shang-Chi 2 at this point. No Young Avengers as they'll all be too damn old.
And most of the rumoured new TV shows / second seasons gone too. And everything in production/already shot delayed.
That would be a terrible shame.
Can't they just be Avengers, then? And heck, characters in their twenties are still "young" compared to the original Avengers.
I think more straight forwardly no evidence it would make money.
Fantastic Four was briefly mentioned on Pedro’s SAG profile but was quickly removed
https://archive.is/mn4wC
https://archive.is/mn4wC
Wow, don’t be an ass.
He read the script (I assume). What did he expect?
Director Matt Shakman has shared a photo that seems to verify that mistake: Pedro Pascal will be playing Reed Richards.
Seems like he's pulling our legs. Why wouldn't he announce it officially?
Is this all confirmed? Or just assumption?
I don't mean that in a belittling way. I honestly don't get all the movie news anymore.
None of that is confirmed. It's not entirely unreasonable speculation, though if they abandon Shang-Chi without even trying a sequel they're morons, imo.
Plus Rich has a history of stating certain things as facts without any sources.