gblews, you sure you don’t want to try exercising some of your superior morals and stop hurling insults? You consistently and completely miss my points, then invent new ones in their place. Rather than address my actual words, you make up statements that are completely at odds with my words and thoughts, and then double down on condemning me for perceived social crimes. All the talking down from the righteous to the morally deficient is just cheap virtue signaling and social justice garbage. You don’t earn an intelligent conversation with that behavior, or make the world a better place, or spread any understanding, you just dump on people to feel smug and superior. I’m deeply unimpressed that you have no better thoughts (or reading retention, for that matter), but for those who care, I will break a few things down. Your response is not solicited, because I don’t think you are going to wise up any time soon, or stop with the outrageous accusations. Go give yourself a medal for moral excellence.
Can a show be diverse AND good? Yeah. (Duh). Does diverse equal good? No. (Duh). Is STD weak because it is diverse? No. Would it be inherently stronger if it were less diverse? No. Does “diverse” mean “as few white people and straight guys as possible?” No. Some people need to look up the word. Diversity and quality are not mutually exclusive, you lecture. Pretty sure I said that too. Can a show have a social agenda and still be good? Yeah, like every other Trek show ever. Star there.
Open auditions was a step in the wrong direction, and we should’ve had a white cast? THAT is what you gleaned from my words?! Is that a joke? Well, I guess if I’d ever said anything like that, then I’d be a bigot, but since I didn’t, you can take the insult and cram it. It’s an insult to anyone reading your words, how quickly you leap to a conclusion that suits your moral perch. Preferring people because of their ethnicity or sexuality is prejudice, and judging people on the content of their character is always appropriate. Obviously there are other issues, like marketability, but taking exception to ACTUAL equality is putting YOU under that “bigot” label you just love to hurl when you need to feel superior, or just can’t manage a civil conversation.
Next you tell me, with two layers of irony, that it is I who doesn’t understand my own words, but you’ll give me the benefit of the doubt. What in the world benefit of the doubt have you ever given? You’ve leaped to ugly accusations and hurtful labels at every turn, never guessing for a moment that you’d missed my point, or even MAYBE misunderstood it, or that I had anything worth saying. You didn’t make any attempt to clarify, just demonize, with extreme prejudice. With your magnanimous self-pat on the back, you go back to putting words in my mouth, now with quotations! “Forget diversity!” You imagine I say, neatly missing every point I’ve made, and still comfy with your bizarre understanding of the word’s meaning. Now you say I want an all white cast. Can you fathom how someone, (let’s say just as righteous as you if that were possible), might just love to hear that ugly garbage placed in their mouths? You sure have a lot of criticisms of all the awful things I never said or even thought.
Next you’ve got the nerve to further put words in mouth with a little box out containing a very strange quote that I absolutely never said. “Pointing out racism is racist”? I never said that. You put those stupid thoughts in a little box and SAID that I did, but I didn’t. I said “MLK knew to judge people by their character, so maybe you should as well.
. You are championing diversity OVER quality, so don’t pretend to mean the opposite.” You are asserting that diversity and quality are inseparable concepts. Hogwash. If diversity made things great, then STD should be amazing. There are great eps of Trek that are just some white guys talking. Are they great eps BECAUSE they are white? No, that’s just stupid. Who would say that? (And who would have the gall to say that somebody else said that when they absolutely didn’t?) There are terrible eps of STD that are heavy on the inclusion side. Are they inherently bad BECAUSE they have a diverse cast? Of course not. Why would you think that I would mean that? You don’t even know me, but you figured out I’m rotten to the core, huh? Have I answered enough of these possible permutations that we can move on? The idea that I didn’t aggressively praise the “diversity” of the show, and that equates to my intolerance is a cheap trick.
People are so caught up in how wonderful it is to have society progressing on social issues, (and yeah, it IS wonderful, -thanks for the virtuous applause-) that it becomes a creepy sort of PC mass fetish. Not only is it perfectly acceptable amongst “enlightened people” to be a minority, to some people it’s vastly preferable. If I don’t literally PREFER gays and minorities (which sounds like prejudice to me), then that must naturally mean that I prefer racial purity, and I’m called a bigot. Well, I DONT prefer any particular race or sex to be in great Star Trek. I prefer great Star Trek. When this mediocre show has a huge agenda and not much else, I call them on blowing their priorities, and on failing to do what Trek has done well in the past: make inclusiveness organic, without making it the defining quality of a show with very few defining qualities. I call them out for succeeding at almost nothing BUT diversity, and that equates somehow to “I hate non whites.” Thanks a bunch for the intelligent discourse.
There’s a thing now that you’d love called “The Future is Female.” It’s another insidious way to allow sexism in a seemingly righteous direction, without noticing how offensive it is in EVERY direction. It should’ve been called “Spotlight on the amazing women of the future!” Or something like that. Inclusive, see? Not implying that women are superior or should dominate, just celebrating the, for what they are. There’s t shirts that say “The Force is Female.” You have any problem with that? You should. It’s obviously sexist. A better world, like Gene invented, needs to find better balance, not a brand new imbalance defined by new intolerances. “The Future is masculine” or “The Force is Masculine” are obviously stupid ideas, and the opposite are as well.
Instead of getting my point, or even trying to, or giving me any benefit of the doubt, you just insult me, condemn me, label me, misunderstand and misquote me. What a tolerant and progressive thinker you are! You’ve been a real jerk about it, and I’m tired of having to explain my way out of your crass oversimplifications. You’ve made this discussion a farce.
It gets me every time (just writing about it). I was watching Voyager yesterday where Janeway says I already have a man and grabs Tuvok's hand and... yeah, you had to be there 
)
