Spoilers Lower Decks General Discussion Thread

[Campe]

It wasn’t a link. It was a email from Paramount Plus. Maybe it’s a invitation thing. I’ll post anyway and see if it works.

https://hanover-research.qualtrics....nKYetW2W?et_cid=178644&et_rid=CBSCOM-30693998

Yeah, see, I unsubscribe from a great majority of marketing emails. There’s too much garbage in inboxes these days. No way I would have seen that or had the foggiest clue what you were discussing. I imagine I’m not the only one either through unsubscribing, sending to spam or simply not reading. If I can offer a suggestion: context is a wonderful thing.

And yes, the link works, thank you.

 

[dupersuper]

It wasn’t a link. It was a email from Paramount Plus. Maybe it’s a invitation thing. I’ll post anyway and see if it works.

https://hanover-research.qualtrics....nKYetW2W?et_cid=178644&et_rid=CBSCOM-30693998

I gave up when it asked for my three favourite shows. I may watch too much tv...

 

[Grendelsbayne]

FYI for anyone outside the US, that survey is only intended for Paramount+ subscribers.

 

[Michael]

Plus, I would also think there's an individual token code in every URL people get sent. So all people using @thribs' link are probably just making that one string of answers to the poll void, because it's supposed to be used only once.

 

[UssGlenn]

Plus, I would also think there's an individual token code in every URL people get sent. So all people using @thribs' link are probably just making that one string of answers to the poll void, because it's supposed to be used only once.

The shared URL appears to be identical to the one I was sent, but I'm no expert about how that sort of thing works.

 

[Michael]

The shared URL appears to be identical to the one I was sent, but I'm no expert about how that sort of thing works.

Neither am I, but if yours does indeed look exactly the same, then yes, I would assume the URLs aren't individualized.

 

[Campe]

It’s probably a fair point though. My point of asking for the link however was more along the lines that it started as a rather vague statement with no context. We don’t all have the same level of engagement in this. But, point taken about the link.

 

[137th Gebirg]

The bit about "I consent to having my personal data collected for this survey" turned me away within two seconds of bringing up the page. I've had about enough of that foolishness to last me 20 lifetimes.

 

[Tim Thomason]

The bit about "I consent to having my personal data collected for this survey" turned me away within two seconds of bringing up the page. I've had about enough of that foolishness to last me 20 lifetimes.

It's cute that they asked that question, as if any of us have a choice.

 

[137th Gebirg]

Exactly.

 

[Crusher Disciple]

Resistance is futile.

 

[The Old Mixer]

At some point, somewhere around here, I made the observation that the Lower Decks forum was the Picard forum's lower deck. Now this forum has a downstairs neighbor...so I guess that makes the Prodigy forum this guy:

 

[Redfern]

View attachment 24732

Why do I think "Ron Stoppable" when I see this kid?

 

[Tuskin38]

One of the Co-Producers, Brad Winters is saying Lower Decks is still in 2380 despite that 2381 party memory (maybe it was fake?)

https://twitter.com/BradinLA/status/1458973550874746880
https://twitter.com/BradinLA/status/1458976391207153665

And the first episode set in 2381 will be Season 3 Episode 6, the 26th episode of the series.
https://twitter.com/BradinLA/status/1459215873349062658

Which seems to be a reference to TNG usually having 25-26 episodes a season, and a lot of people considering 1 Season of TNG takes place over the course of a year.
https://twitter.com/BradinLA/status/1459223568944824322

 

[F. King Daniel]

One of the Co-Producers, Brad Winters is saying Lower Decks is still in 2380 despite that 2381 party memory (maybe it was fake?)

Or there's a LOT more to Rutherford's backstory than we know. Maybe those uncovered memories aren't Section 31, but Temporal Investigations...

 

[dupersuper]

One of the Co-Producers, Brad Winters is saying Lower Decks is still in 2380 despite that 2381 party memory (maybe it was fake?)

https://twitter.com/BradinLA/status/1458973550874746880
https://twitter.com/BradinLA/status/1458976391207153665

And the first episode set in 2381 will be Season 3 Episode 6, the 26th episode of the series.
https://twitter.com/BradinLA/status/1459215873349062658

Which seems to be a reference to TNG usually having 25-26 episodes a season, and a lot of people considering 1 Season of TNG takes place over the course of a year.
https://twitter.com/BradinLA/status/1459223568944824322

I may have to adjust my timeline...

 

[Jinn]

One of the Co-Producers, Brad Winters is saying Lower Decks is still in 2380 despite that 2381 party memory (maybe it was fake?)

https://twitter.com/BradinLA/status/1458973550874746880
https://twitter.com/BradinLA/status/1458976391207153665

And the first episode set in 2381 will be Season 3 Episode 6, the 26th episode of the series.
https://twitter.com/BradinLA/status/1459215873349062658

Which seems to be a reference to TNG usually having 25-26 episodes a season, and a lot of people considering 1 Season of TNG takes place over the course of a year.
https://twitter.com/BradinLA/status/1459223568944824322

In the first episode of season 2 they refer to Rutherford's date with Barnes from the first episode of season 1 as happening last year though. I'll keep season 2 in 2381 until we get on-screen evidence that it's in 2380.

 

[The Wormhole]

It should also be noted the second digit of the stardates went up for the second season, which usually does signify a year has passed.

 

[Finn]

I really like this show. I don't get why the Cerritos Boimler couldn't keep his promotion


And where were the non-com folks????

 

[Ryan Thomas Riddle]

I really like this show. I don't get why the Cerritos Boimler couldn't keep his promotion


And where were the non-com folks????

We saw a chief petty officer in "Crisis Point," during Mariner's holodeck movie.