• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Laws that should be nationalized

While I understand that different cities and states have different needs (driving laws, for instance, can vary wildly because of of a state's terrain)

Not that wildly. Are there any (sovereign) states within which variations occur as to which side of the road one is supposed to drive?
 
Nope, that's a state law. And boy do the attendants run to your car when you pull up. Apparently there's a pretty big fine involved if someone pumps their own gas. It's fine with me, it rains here a LOT and in the summer I'm a lazy SOB. It's much easier to just hand over the card or cash and not have to get out of the car. And we still have the lowest gas prices on the West Coast.

Wow interesting. Any insight as to why this is law?
Robert Maxwell pretty much explained it. Periodically the fuel dealers will put forward a public initiative to repeal the law and it fails every time. Evidently, the voters don't really want to pump their own.
 
Nope, that's a state law. And boy do the attendants run to your car when you pull up. Apparently there's a pretty big fine involved if someone pumps their own gas. It's fine with me, it rains here a LOT and in the summer I'm a lazy SOB. It's much easier to just hand over the card or cash and not have to get out of the car. And we still have the lowest gas prices on the West Coast.

Wow interesting. Any insight as to why this is law?
Robert Maxwell pretty much explained it. Periodically the fuel dealers will put forward a public initiative to repeal the law and it fails every time. Evidently, the voters don't really want to pump their own.

Who wants to change a law that lets you be lazy? :lol:

I tell you, it's weird driving back to Indiana and having to pump my own. Sometimes I sit for a few minutes, waiting for an attendant to come to my window, before I realize I'm supposed to do it myself.

I guess that means I've become accustomed to Jersey. :lol:
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

:)

The US is not a single-government entity. It is a collection of fifty federated states, who are in turn collections of county and municipal governments.

That's not entirely true. As established by the Preamble, the sovereignty of the United States rests with the people, whose powers - and portions of whose collective sovereignty - are delegated to two distinct and separate levels of government: the States and the United States. Constitutionally, we aren't a collection of states we aren't a collection of states which have surrendered some powers to a central government, as we were under the articles; we're a single people who have collectively granted separate aspects of our authority to two competing organs of government.

The preamble carries no enforcable legal authority however. So be careful.
 
Who wants to change a law that lets you be lazy? :lol:
Well, if they could actually prove that it would produce a cost savings they might have a better chance. But since they never can, they don't.
I tell you, it's weird driving back to Indiana and having to pump my own. Sometimes I sit for a few minutes, waiting for an attendant to come to my window, before I realize I'm supposed to do it myself.
I have the same problem every time I drive out of state. :lol:
 
Nope, that's a state law. And boy do the attendants run to your car when you pull up. Apparently there's a pretty big fine involved if someone pumps their own gas. It's fine with me, it rains here a LOT and in the summer I'm a lazy SOB. It's much easier to just hand over the card or cash and not have to get out of the car. And we still have the lowest gas prices on the West Coast.

I like full service stations too, but why should it be a law? I should be able to pump my own gas if I want to. We have no such law here, and we still have full serve stations.

It's just an antiquated law based on fear that people would blow themselves up, and they've just never been repealed.
Occasionally someone does manage to start a serious fire. Some people return to the passenger cabin of the vehicle breifly with the nozzle still in the vehicle's filler opening. In the low humidity conditions common during winter the customer can acumulate a static charge during that brief side trip. If they touch the car near the gas fill point the spark can ignite the gas fumes. The situation is sometimes further complicated by a panicked withdrawal of the nozzle, spilling fuel on and around the vehicle. The preventative is to touch a metal part of the car body located well away from the filler opening before reaching for the nozzle.

Another occasional hazard is someone filling the container they use to refuel their chain saw or lawn equipment while the container is in or on the vehicle.

Diesel and kerosene don't produce as many fumes and are probably less hazrdous, although I would still recommend the same precautions about static discharge and container location when filling.

Mythbusters demonstrated that operating a cell phone isn't as much of a hazard as some gas station signs indicate (unless some other customer gets tired of the delay while you talk on the phone).
 
Federalized Conceal Carry Permits would be nice.

No, they really wouldn't

An armed society is a polite society.:techman:

That must be why Afghanistan looks like it's run by Emily Post and Dodge City was known for its quaint tea parties.

There are unarmed societies that are peaceful, and there are armed societies that are peaceful. There are also armed societies that are wartorn. Africa is pretty heavily armed and I haven't seen massive outbreaks of peace and goodwill there. Let's not pretend that the simple presence of overwhelming firepower is what determines if a society if polite and peaceful or not, because that is not supported by history, current events, or common sense. There are a lot of factors that go into it, and it's naive to point at one thing as some kind of universal Band-Aid.
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

:)

The US is not a single-government entity. It is a collection of fifty federated states, who are in turn collections of county and municipal governments.

That's not entirely true. As established by the Preamble, the sovereignty of the United States rests with the people, whose powers - and portions of whose collective sovereignty - are delegated to two distinct and separate levels of government: the States and the United States. Constitutionally, we aren't a collection of states we aren't a collection of states which have surrendered some powers to a central government, as we were under the articles; we're a single people who have collectively granted separate aspects of our authority to two competing organs of government.

The preamble carries no enforcable legal authority however. So be careful.

The Preamble lacks substantive power, but does provide context to the Constitution as a whole. In that capacity, it's sometimes enforced indirectly. (See Ellis v. City of Grand Rapids, for example.)

Particularly, the Preamble is the only part of the Constitution which defines the United States. (Thus, any decision which relies on a definition of the US draws authority from the Preamble.) One might reasonably argue that the Preamble, insofar as it establishes the United States, is actually the most frequently enforced part of US law.

(I do see your point.)
 
Why is okay in some places for you to order a mixed drink at a bar and then leave with it, while in other places you can't even go to a grocery store and pay for the liquor outside of the liquor department?

Or, you know, at all, since grocery stores do not sell alcohol in many states.
Like mine.

Pennsylvania only has state run liquor stores. Thus our selection is rather limited since the state doesn't buy everything, and we can't import anything. I don't know if this is typical around the country either, but we can't buy liquor or cases of beer in the same place. Bottle & Can stores and liquor stores are separate entities.
 
Here you can buy beer and wine just about anywhere (grocery stores, Target, pharmacies, gas stations, convenience stores, etc.) but you have to purchase the hard stuff from a state store.
 
Here you can buy Wine and Beer and similar stuff (Twisted Tea, Hard Lemonade) at the Supermarket, but that's a pretty recent development; and they cordon off that section on Sundays. For the hard stuff, you must go to a liquor store.
 
OK, I'll go there. Gay marriage laws. Now I'm not trying to put a judgement on it. But assuming it gets legalized in some states, I can't wrap my mind around the fact that it wouldn't be legal in other states. What happens if a person in a legal gay marriage in one state gets relocated to a state where it isn't legal, for example? All of a sudden they aren't married anymore?
If you're married anywhere in the US, you should be married everywhere in the US.

I agree, underscoring that the issue is a human rights one. And those are the laws that should be nationalized, and even globalized. That was the hope of the Geneva Conventions, but unfortunately the Shining Beacon has shit on it.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top