Ha! That makes me think of another "girly" thing I can't stand: the color pink. Bleh!
It could work... the attacker would probably fall down laughing, which would give the woman enough time to either escape or shoot him.Whaaaat?![]()
Well, we all know that ladies definitely need their own pens...
But let's not forget that men are the victims of unnecessarily gendered products too!
Superman likes pink.![]()
Superman likes pink.![]()
Poe, yes poe, please.
If you're talking about the story in that link, that's about sexual orientation, not individual expression. Gender doesn't dictate one's ability at math or taste in literature or any of the other enduring stereotypes.You can't erase biochemistry and trying to erase it does as much harm as denying variables.
I don't think this works as well as the reverse. No one minds if women wear men's clothes, kiss women, and shoot guns. In fact, that's hawt.Men still have unfair pay and power, but women have been WAAAY more successful at liberating themselves from traditional gender stuff than men have so far.
Which isn't to discourage discussion of your topic, by any means. I'm just sayin'.![]()
Um, no. That is one of the most famous cases about gender identity there is, and has nothing to do with sexual orientation. The reason that case is studied so intensely today, is that it is one of the strongest pieces of evidence that disproves the theory that gender identity is entirely a social construct. Gender identity is biological, and completely separate from sexual orientation (which is why there are gay and lesbian trans men and women, as well as straight trans men and women).If you're talking about the story in that link, that's about sexual orientation, not individual expression. Gender doesn't dictate one's ability at math or taste in literature or any of the other enduring stereotypes.You can't erase biochemistry and trying to erase it does as much harm as denying variables.
I don't think anyone here intended to imply otherwise.[...] it is dishonest to deny that there are differences between the genders
Knew someone that claimed to carry a pink pistol in her purse. By her own account, was terrible shot, but got cause it was "cute"Making real guns that look like toys is an exceptionally stupid and dangerous thing to do.![]()
Nope not blonde. Just...odd.Cute? An instrument designed to kill a person in a highly effective way at a distance? If it weren't another stupid stereotype I'd ask if she was blonde.
Not a chance in hell of me ever dating anyone, male, female or otherwise, who carries a gun! I'd date anyone who carries a book, though! Brains are sexy!
Um, no. That is one of the most famous cases about gender identity there is, and has nothing to do with sexual orientation. The reason that case is studied so intensely today, is that it is one of the strongest pieces of evidence that disproves the theory that gender identity is entirely a social construct. Gender identity is biological, and completely separate from sexual orientation (which is why there are gay and lesbian trans men and women, as well as straight trans men and women).If you're talking about the story in that link, that's about sexual orientation, not individual expression. Gender doesn't dictate one's ability at math or taste in literature or any of the other enduring stereotypes.You can't erase biochemistry and trying to erase it does as much harm as denying variables.
No one is saying that gender stereotypes are the be all end all, just that it is dishonest to deny that there are differences between the genders, and that taking that denial to extremes is as harmful as limiting people to traditional gender roles.
Did you read any part of what I posted other than the line you quoted? Like the first part of that sentence, where I wrote:I don't think anyone here intended to imply otherwise.[...] it is dishonest to deny that there are differences between the genders
But what's important is that nobody ought to get chastized or ostracized for liking things that are traditionally considered to be typical for the other gender. Paradoxly, we can quite readily accept that people have a different sexual orientation, but find it tremeduousely difficult to accept that people have different preferences in their every day lives and hobbies. Why would a woman be less feminine only because she likes to weld or solder? Why would a man be less masculine only because he reads Georgette Heyer? I think society as a whole must work on finally getting rid of all these outdated stereotypoes.
thestrangequark said:No one is saying that gender stereotypes are the be all end all...
I completely disagree. Gender roles and stereotypes are simply cultural expectations that people are bullied and brainwashed into following. There are two aspects to every person: Their humanity and their individuality. That's all there is to it.I think there are differences in the sexes. Women are prone to be more sensitive, to listen more, to express emotions more than men.
thestrangequark said:That's not actually true, though. As much as I loathe the men vs women nonsense, there is an undeniable biological difference between the male and female sexes that affects psychology and behavior precisely in ways that are often stereotypical. Denying the role of nature in gender has had tragic consequences. The more accurate way to see it is that there are inherent differences between the sexes, but that the variability within the groups is greater than the variability between groups.
I've noticed that we have some posters here that like to do this. My theory is that they are political speech- and script-writers, used to taking sound bites and excerpts and playing them to whatever purpose they want, regardless of context or actual meaning.Did you read any part of what I posted other than the line you quoted?
^Gender identity was one of the most fascinating subjects to me when I studied psychology! Have you ever read Middlesex by Jeffrey Eugenides?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.