• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Kelvin Timeline all but confirmed

This is more fiction than transporters and warp drive. :p
Extremely sad to hear: We can't have a show with social development where things improve. Nonsense really.

There's certainly a lot of ugliness within humanity but there's been a lot of social development and a lot of it is tied directly to technological development. Even with blips, there is plenty of evidence we are currently living in the best time ever for humanity as a whole (which I have supplied evidence for many times), though surely with a lot of room for improvement. To say as a default that there will not be any is exactly contrary to current facts. So sure, there is plenty of room for optimism and Gene's vision.

Will we ever be perfect? Define perfection...but probably not.

RAMA
 
Extremely sad to hear: We can't have a show with social development where things improve. Nonsense really.

No where did I say we can't have a show like that, but it is fiction. You strip away the creature comforts and we are just as barbaric as any of our ancestors.
 
No where did I say we can't have a show like that, but it is fiction. You strip away the creature comforts and we are just as barbaric as any of our ancestors.
I'll let Kirk give my response:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
So humanity is doomed, then?

Doomed? No. I think we'll exist in one form or another for a long time, but I think we have times ahead that will make the world wars look like a Sunday picnic and our numbers will rapidly decline.

If there is a Star Trek like universe in our future, I betting more that it is the thirty-third century vs. the twenty-third.
 
Doomed? No. I think we'll exist in one form or another for a long time, but I think we have times ahead that will make the world wars look like a Sunday picnic and our numbers will rapidly decline.

If there is a Star Trek like universe in our future, I betting more that it is the thirty-third century vs. the twenty-third.
Isn't that part of Trek's history though?
 
Doomed? No. I think we'll exist in one form or another for a long time, but I think we have times ahead that will make the world wars look like a Sunday picnic and our numbers will rapidly decline.

Yep; some estimates of the toll on the population of climate change over the next five hundred years or so suggest 90% losses.
 
Doomed? No. I think we'll exist in one form or another for a long time, but I think we have times ahead that will make the world wars look like a Sunday picnic and our numbers will rapidly decline.

If there is a Star Trek like universe in our future, I betting more that it is the thirty-third century vs. the twenty-third.
Major wars usually lead to major population booms.
 
Major wars usually lead to major population booms.

Well, war will certainly come, along with famine, disease etc. But climate change is destroying the world that we built our civilization in. That will kill people on a scale that all the wars in human history cannot match.

In the real world there is no "Star Trek" future. We've already precluded it.
 
For me, at least, it has nothing to do with disliking the Prime timeline. Just watched three episodes of Enterprise the day before yesterday. I just feel it is time for a clean slate.
Make it the timeline where the Federation is destroyed by the Borg and Riker has a terrible beard lol
Or the one where Worf and Troi make babies
 
I was just making a joke about how we live in an alternative facts/post-truth society now, not making any serious commentary on Discovery.

But now that you mention it, I don't see any reason not to take the producers at their word that this new show is set in the Prime Universe, but at the same time I think people are placing way too much emphasis on what that means in terms of the look and feel and possibly even the historical aspects of the show. I think they'll try to adhere to the broadstrokes of established Prime-Trek history insofar as it doesn't seriously affect their ability to tell the stories they want, but in terms of rigidly adhering to the design parameters and production limitations of a fifty year old show for the sake of not upsetting the apple cart of a few Canonistas who treat this stuff like it came down from on-high and was written on stone tablets? Not gonna happen.

And that's exactly the way it should be. Whether the crew has to give a hand-job to a wall control in order to make the space elevator go up and down to and from the bridge is about the least important thing to consider when making the show. It was ridiculous on Enterprise that solely for the sake of looking more primitive than TOS they had to inconveniently reach over to the right and press a button on a side panel in order to open the doors. Because automatic doors haven't been a thing for decades already.

I know, I know

1. World war three due to radiation poisoning turned the the remnants of humanity into a bunch of ignoramuses that they entered a modern Dark Ages where all the technical know how of the past was forgotten. So by the time The Vulcans came along Earth was more like the early 1920's era, so it took another 100 years to invent automatic doors and speaking elevators (Even tho I use one every day in my office building in 2017) LOL

2. Star Trek has never been about our real world Earth's future but another Earth far far away....(Hence we never had a real life Eugenics war in the 1970's)
 
Hell, people forget the backlash TNG got when it launched; or the cries of "DS9 is too dark...it's p*ssing all over GR's 'vision'.."

Cries of "NOT TREK" are par for the course when ANY new Star Trek project is announced and put into actual production.

GR's vision was to make money and entertain folks.... and he did.
As Shatner so eloquently put it, us fans need to 'Get a life!'
 
Isn't that part of Trek's history though?

Climate change? We are going to have a rough period that Trek didn't predict. One that is going to kill a lot of people. Not the 37 million mentioned in "Bread and Circuses" nor the 600 million mentioned in First Contact. We are talking in the billions. I can easily see a good portion of the human race wiped away from what we are about to go through.
 
Climate change? We are going to have a rough period that Trek didn't predict. One that is going to kill a lot of people. Not the 37 million mentioned in "Bread and Circuses" nor the 600 million mentioned in First Contact. We are talking in the billions. I can easily see a good portion of the human race wiped away from what we are about to go through.

Those numbers when the population was only about 4 billion seems a lot , I think they need to revise them in the Star Trek franchise. If things are based on our present day, then it will take the loss of billions plus First Contact for humans to wake up and smell the coffee.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top