Starfleet would have still gone after Eddington and other former Starfleet turned Maquis because all of the ones we have seen, with the exception of Chakotay, committed treason by working for the Maquis while still in Starfleet. In other words, treason. Chakotay at least did the proper, and honorable, thing by resigning first and THEN joining. Plus, they had already stolen those industrial replicators. They were going to be hunted by Starfleet, whether Eddington kept to what he said or not. (And you aren't right simply because it IS a hypothetical. Since events proved otherwise, there's no way to know.)I'm right because what I said was a hypothetical. I said IF the Maquis never bothered the Federation,, the UFP would be powerless to do anything against them. That's obviously not what happened and Eddigton and the greater Maquis were huge fools for ever trying to attack or steal from the Federation at all. If they never did, the UFP would have to leave them entirely alone.
So what?
Yes, it is some kind of medical agent which is obviously why the head doctor is in charge of it. But that doesn't mean it's the kind of garden-variety "medical supply" that Kasidy was delivering at all. That would have been entirely separate issue. Bio gel is a "controlled substance" that possession of itself can be considered a crime.
That's not at all what Kasidy was delivering or what the Maquis was looking for. They wanted stuff to fix them up once they got shot.
Yes, he got off lightly due to him being an important character in the show they didn't want to write off.
Pure speculation.
Regarding what Kasidy smuggled... it SEEMED like it was medical supplies, but there was nothing certain. O'Brien said the transporter trace was 80% organic, and he theorized food or medical supplies. They did not know for sure. In any case, she was still smuggling to a criminal, terrorist organization.
And so what? It was illegal to smuggle goods to a terrorist organization, whether they are legal goods or not.
Regarding Yates' sentence... I know what I said was speculation. That's why I said 'likely' and not 'certainly'.
