Spoilers Justice League - Grading and Discussion

Discussion in 'Science Fiction & Fantasy' started by dodge, Nov 13, 2017.

?

Grade the Movie

  1. A+

    7 vote(s)
    6.4%
  2. A

    12 vote(s)
    10.9%
  3. A-

    9 vote(s)
    8.2%
  4. B+

    20 vote(s)
    18.2%
  5. B

    14 vote(s)
    12.7%
  6. B-

    12 vote(s)
    10.9%
  7. C+

    11 vote(s)
    10.0%
  8. C

    6 vote(s)
    5.5%
  9. C-

    2 vote(s)
    1.8%
  10. D+

    5 vote(s)
    4.5%
  11. D

    3 vote(s)
    2.7%
  12. D-

    2 vote(s)
    1.8%
  13. F

    7 vote(s)
    6.4%
  1. dodge

    dodge Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    The general public doesn't read comics at all.
     
  2. Turtletrekker

    Turtletrekker Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2003
    Location:
    Tacoma, Washington
    :lol::lol::lol:
    If you say so.
    :lol::lol::lol:
     
    Anwar likes this.
  3. Kai "the spy"

    Kai "the spy" Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Location:
    Around
    General public asked about their opinion on Jack Kirby: "Who?"
     
    Set Harth and Morpheus 02 like this.
  4. Turtletrekker

    Turtletrekker Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2003
    Location:
    Tacoma, Washington
    No doubt. But "only hardcore comic nerds" ? Ask just about any comic creator about the impact and influence of Jack Kirby, and you'll realize that the the genre as it exists today owes as much or more to him as it does to Stan Lee, Siegel and Shuster, Kane, Finger and Robinson, or any other name you would care to bring up.
     
    Last edited: Apr 17, 2018
  5. crookeddy

    crookeddy Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2006
    Of course! But "the genre as it exists" is a problem the comic book industry have been battling since they realized its a problem in the '90s.
     
  6. Anwar

    Anwar Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2006
    Location:
    Moncton, NB
    That stopped being a problem once there started being people in charge who weren't ashamed of comics, like Feige.
     
  7. M'rk son of Mogh

    M'rk son of Mogh Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2001
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Who "realized its a problem" in the 90s? I thought the problem of the 90s was the gimmick covers, x-treme reimaginings and darkening of characters and the speculation boom. Never once have I read about the problem being Kirby.
     
  8. Turtletrekker

    Turtletrekker Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2003
    Location:
    Tacoma, Washington
    Movie makers are hardly distancing themselves from Kirby. The directors producers and production designers of Thor Ragnarok went out of their way to produce as Kirbyesque an aesthetic as humanly possible for the scenes set on Sakkar. DC is developing a movie based on Kirby's New Gods and Marvel is developing a movie based on Kirby's Eternals.
     
  9. Anwar

    Anwar Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2006
    Location:
    Moncton, NB
    And one of the most Kirby-esque movies got an above 90% rating, to boot.
     
  10. crookeddy

    crookeddy Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2006
    Fucked up times we're living in.
     
  11. Turtletrekker

    Turtletrekker Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2003
    Location:
    Tacoma, Washington
    :lol:
    Once again, if you say so. I mean, there are lots of legitimate reasons to say that we're living in fucked up times, but a movie with Kirbyesque aesthetics being popular being one of them? Just who are you trying to convince? Is it maybe possible that it is simply that YOU don't like Kirby's work and are projecting that dislike on to other people?
     
    Anwar likes this.
  12. Gaith

    Gaith Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 11, 2008
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    San Francisco Chronicle critic Mick LaSalle agrees, pointing out the obvious:

    With “Justice League,” DC Comics is trying to replicate the success of Marvel’s Avengers franchise, but there’s one big problem. These are not flashy personalities with special talents that happen to complement each other. These people are not, as Hillary Clinton might put it, “stronger together.” They might as well be working solo.

    Basically, Superman can do everything and needs no one else. And Batman can do nothing. And there’s a few in between who can do a little here and a little there. For example, they can bring Superman coffee.

    ... In this crew, Batman is like a rich amateur who produces a movie and then insists on being in it, and no one can tell him no because he has the money. Or he’s like a player coach, long past his prime, who puts himself into the starting lineup. In the right hands, Batman is a great character, with lots of psychological nooks and crannies. Throwing him into the Justice League is a disservice to the character.​

    As Ian Malcolm might say, "just because you can put Batman and Superman in a movie together doesn't necessarily mean that you should."
     
  13. King Daniel Beyond

    King Daniel Beyond Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2008
    Location:
    the grimdark bluniverse
    Yes but can't one say similar about The Avengers? What good are a guy with a bow and arrow or a women with pistols against hoards of aliens or killbots or whatever when the team have Thor, Cap, Hulk and Iron Man's supertech? Whedon lampshaded it in Ultron, where Hawkeye points out how a guy with a bow and arrow taking on an army of robots makes no sense.
     
  14. Gaith

    Gaith Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 11, 2008
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    One could, but that would be to miss at least three key points. For one, Clint and Natasha aren't random lone actors - they're SHIELD agents (and then established Avengers), with all the access to backup and resources provided to the same. (Notice how we don't get recruitment scenes for either of them in the first movie - introduction scenes, yes, but not recruitment scenes.) Point two, at no point are they expected to hold their own against (or even engage) such Big Bads as Loki or the primary Ultron. Point three, the Avengers team earns Clint and Nat's story presence precisely because the core trio of Tony, Cap, and Thor are so well balanced, as the initial forest brawl demonstrates. Clint and Nat are there to add flavor to the story, not to be its main drivers - and while there is indeed a superficial similarity to the power disparities at play, that major distinction makes all the difference.

    (That said, in the first scene of Ultron, when the mooks are ordered to fire on the "weaker ones," I do always expect Tim Allen to yell "They're the Avengers - there are no weak ones!" :p)
     
    Anwar likes this.
  15. theenglish

    theenglish Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2001
    Location:
    Cameroon
    Pegg was one of the writers of the movie.
     
  16. dodge

    dodge Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    So much for "Whedon was just doing what Snyder wanted." :whistle:

    [​IMG]
     
  17. crookeddy

    crookeddy Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2006
    Paging @DigificWriter
     
  18. The Realist

    The Realist Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2001
    Which was always transparent PR spin, though some people continue inexplicably to quote it as the Holy Word of God.
     
    crookeddy likes this.
  19. Turtletrekker

    Turtletrekker Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2003
    Location:
    Tacoma, Washington
    Whedon did what the studio wanted him to do not what Snyder wanted him to do. Which is, after all, who hired him and signed his check.
     
  20. crookeddy

    crookeddy Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2006
    No need to defend Whedon. He didn't do anything unethical. It's just that WB wants people to believe that this was a Zack Snyder movie, slightly changed by Joss Whedon, so as to not anger the 5 Zack Snyder fans left.