I've gotta say that "luxury" version looks fantastic.
That's why WalMart has mark down bins...To be fair, Paramount/CBS does overprice their DVDs and blu-rays.
Then why then is Star Trek: First Contact still Prime universe when Zefram Cochrane is completely different to the version in "Metamorphosis"? Why is Star Trek: Enterprise, when it's characters, ship and events are never seen or referred to in any of the subsequent Treks even in situations (like those ship displays in the conference lounge) they should?
I guess it comes down to how literally you choose to interpret what we see. IMO it's a television show telling a story, not historical documents showing found footage of real events exactly as they happened.
the Star Destroyers in the original Star Wars didn't have internal lighting, believe it or not).
Getting Peter Weller back for an episode to play Admiral Marcus (over subspace, Section 31 subplot) would be pretty awesome.
No, not unless he portrays John Frederick Paxton, or a future relative of his.![]()
Could be both. I would watch that.
People have coined this goofy term "head canon," which is equivalent to "subterranean flying bird."
People have coined this goofy term "head canon," which is equivalent to "subterranean flying bird."
I think it's possible to use the exact design of the TOS constitution class, and add a modern level of detail to make it look every bit as "real" as the ships used in the alternate timeline movies. Imagine phaser cannons popping up from the hull, like they do on the Kelvin, or detailing in the windows where you see people walking. And I think there is an argument to be made that the TOS Constitution design is more advanced looking than the NX, because it is sleeker and more minimalist. The only thing that dates the TOS design for me is the fact the deflector dish area is not lit.The Batmobile or the Daily Planet are better analogies than real world cars, tanks because they like the Connie are fictional objects. Their looks have been updated as style and technology have changed. A Connie in the new show should reflect a "modern" aesthetic.
WalMart? How old school. Amazon is where it's at now.That's why WalMart has mark down bins...![]()
I have to say, this is the first time I've ever heard that complaint, and it is an odd one to make, IMO.The only thing that dates the TOS design for me is the fact the deflector dish area is not lit.
I have to say, this is the first time I've ever heard that complaint, and it is an odd one to make, IMO.
J.J. Abrams would never even think about redesigning an iconic ship like the Millennium Falcon in TFA!
but...but...wings!A bird is not a bat.
Words mean something.
Star Wars ships aren't dated designs like the TOS Enterprise.
Star Wars ships aren't dated designs like the TOS Enterprise.
My source for that info is "Sculpting a Galaxy" by Lorne Peterson, but I have found very little information about the Star Destroyer models online. For the original Star Wars, a small three foot model was made of the Star Destroyer, which had lighting only for the engines. For the Empire Strikes back, a new model was built, which was eight feet long and had a full fiber optic system for the windows.I never knew this. Can you help me find out more? Googling it just brought up loads of model kit ads.
Fine. Cave swallows, then.A bird is not a bat.
Words mean something.
I don't know about the Falcon, because it's supposed to be a junker (and technically, Star Wars is a Long, Long time agoThe only part I'd argue is dated about ship designs in Star Wars is the cockpit of the Millennium Falcon, with its back wall of blinking lights which for some reason everyone in the 1970s considered futuristic.
Actually, I think it was when I re-watched Alien for the first time in years when I was 19 I actually screamed "why did everyone in the 70s think a wall of blinking lights was futuristic?" when I saw such a wall in the control room of the ship.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.