• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Jayru (JSnaith's) 3D Trek

But, I can be flexible on this, maybe there is an argument for making a radical change to the Saladin Class saucer, and perhaps there is an argument that it doesn't need to have a shuttlebay or shuttles. Comments and thoughts are welcome on that.
I vote for no shuttlebay. Similarly to naval ships, larger ships may have heliport launch/landing/hangar, and the smaller ships don't.
 
Introducing the USS Athena NCC-575:

halaQuw.jpeg
7GBj9tA.jpeg
TuU7eHD.jpeg
xGoiK2U.jpeg


Comments always welcome, more tomorrow!
 
My only issue with these is that the dorsal (or ventral - depends on your point of view) has a semi-airfoil type of appearance. It's not flat sided at all.

NASM Get a Closer Look at the Star Trek Enterprise Model
I followed the blueprints I have, the details of the nacelle are shown at the 180degree mark on this class. If you are saying the nacelle should be different shoot me some references, I can correct if required.
 
It's something for me to think on. I've done hanger bays before, and my shuttles tend to have basic interiors. It's not a small undertaking, but something I've found "adds" to the 3d-ness of the models, similar to the way I put "rooms" (textured lightboxes) behind the windows to enhance the way the ships look.

Humm, in answer to your question, having looked at various fan-plans for the Saladin Class I cannot see how a shuttle bay could be worked into the ship. A ship without a hanger bay and shuttles? Well... They do exist in the Trek universe. Ok, ok, yes, I could fit a bay into the upper part of the saucer, but honestly? I think it will be fine not to have a hanger bay for that ship.

But, I can be flexible on this, maybe there is an argument for making a radical change to the Saladin Class saucer, and perhaps there is an argument that it doesn't need to have a shuttlebay or shuttles. Comments and thoughts are welcome on that.

why not an underside launch/drop bay akin to the NX-class and Defiant-class..?
 
I followed the blueprints I have, the details of the nacelle are shown at the 180degree mark on this class. If you are saying the nacelle should be different shoot me some references, I can correct if required.

Just curious, are you working strictly off of a specific blueprint or are you also adding your own take?
 
Just curious, are you working strictly off of a specific blueprint or are you also adding your own take?
I use the blueprints to get the proportions of things right, and then get the details off them and try and match as closely as I can. I'm not using just one set, as I've found various differences between blueprint sets - especially with the Connie. I think when I do something the first time, it's best to be as accurate as possible before adding my own flare to it ;-)
 
I think that the Constitution Class design is actually older, than the Constitution Class itself is...

However, the previous Class, couldn't break the Time Barrier.

I have detected hints in the first few episodes of TOS, that Gene Roddenberry and company, had an idea in the back of their minds.

The originally named USS Yorktown, had as we all know a maximum speed of. 73 of one light-year per hour...

In the pilot episode 'The Cage ' navigator Jose Tyler exclaims that the time barrier has been broken.

In the episode 'Where No Man Has Gone Before ' it takes automated freighters twenty years to get out to Delta Vega. And then there's the acceleration from rest for picking up the Valiant's recorder/marker into space warp... It takes time. At first the "stars" don't move, then they slowly change position.

So .73 of one light-year per hour is about 6,400c...twenty times slower is 320c, the point being that we have a Before and After set of numbers. Meaning that most long range ships most likely were sleeper ships.

Just something to consider when designing older ships...were the crews awake or not? Explains much, if not awake. Think 'Alien'.
 
I followed the blueprints I have, the details of the nacelle are shown at the 180degree mark on this class. If you are saying the nacelle should be different shoot me some references, I can correct if required.
Actually talking about the strut/pylon between the saucer and engineering hull. The leading edge is curved more like an airfoil, the trailing edge is somewhat as well.

The engine struts look good to me.
 
Actually talking about the strut/pylon between the saucer and engineering hull. The leading edge is curved more like an airfoil, the trailing edge is somewhat as well.

The engine struts look good to me.
I think I get what you are saying, but yes on both ships the dorsal interconnector (neck) is curved on the leading and trailing edge, but it doesn't taper. The same as the pylons (engine struts) on the Constitution - they are also curved on the leading and trailing edges, and again no taper.

The idea, as far as I can confirm, is that the Constitution, Saladin, Hermes, Ptolomy Classes all share components - just in different configurations.
 
I think I get what you are saying, but yes on both ships the dorsal interconnector (neck) is curved on the leading and trailing edge, but it doesn't taper. The same as the pylons (engine struts) on the Constitution - they are also curved on the leading and trailing edges, and again no taper.

The idea, as far as I can confirm, is that the Constitution, Saladin, Hermes, Ptolomy Classes all share components - just in different configurations.

I think I get what @StarCruiser is saying. The neck on your version appears to have fillets on the leading edges and the front face is flat (red). The front face should be curved like the leading edge of an airplane wing (green).

X6srPtd.png
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top