Ro_Laren said:
I am glad to see that a "purist" is okay with the way the movie is going.
If only other TOS-only purists can be so convinced.
Ro_Laren said:
I am glad to see that a "purist" is okay with the way the movie is going.
Franklin said:
This is the classic example of having someone inside the tent pissing out instead of outside the tent pissing in.
Can you say, "Co-opted?" I know you can.
GeorgeKirk said:
I really don't understand the hatred toward James here. I've never heard one negative anecdote about the guy (and if he were a jerk like, say, William Shatner, then word would have spread pretty quickly) and all he's known for is spending tons of his own money to give the fans a Star Trek production to enjoy at a time when The Powers That Be were basically ignoring us.
I'm happy for him and I'm glad he likes the direction the new film is going.
Shatner's shitting platinum bricks right nowOutpost4 said:
I bet this REALLY pisses off Shatner.Franklin said:
So, THAT Kirk is in.![]()
![]()
![]()
Jessop said:
WTF? Who is Abrams going to cast next, my mom?
George_42 said:
Jessop said:
WTF? Who is Abrams going to cast next, my mom?
Yes, yes he is.
Dunno. Has she booked plane tickets to LA lately?Jessop said:
WTF? Who is Abrams going to cast next, my mom?
22 Stars said:
Trujew said:
I hope he is a background character they kill off quickly. Frankly im sick of hearing about this hack.
Oh shuddup. You visit a thread specifically about James Cawley and then say you're sick of hearing about him and call him names?![]()
Jack Bauer said:
It's hard to accuse the guy of being a sellout when he still says "It's not what I would've done". He's being a mature adult human being and not some whiny little fanboy going off on something because it doesn't match up with what he wants.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.