• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Isn't it time we realize Rick Berman was the genius of the ST we love

Re: Isn't it time we realize Rick Berman was the genius of the ST we l

...and he couldn't get into it cause he felt it was like a cheap B movie...

In all the years I've been a Trek fan, I've never seen this criticism of The Wrath of Khan before.

"B movie" is a little harsh, but I've seen people mention the production quality before.

Imagine how much worse it could have been if Paramount had scrapped the TMP sets.

Although, part of me wonders what it would have looked like if Meyer had the money to have had new sets, Enterprise model, etc., and if that may have complimented his "Hornblower in space" vision even better.
 
Re: Isn't it time we realize Rick Berman was the genius of the ST we l

Isn't fun to retroactively criticize complete strangers for how they handled a job we wouldn't know how to do?

It's a message board about a TV/Movie series. What else are we suppose to talk about, exactly? Should we never criticize anything more than a year or two old? He stuck around so long that Trek became an incredibly stale franchise.

Berman did some decent work hiring other writers but, ultimately, his contributions have been forgettable. Much of Modern Trek has been forgettable.

Can Berman Trek still be considered "modern" if it's been off the air for almost ten years?

Abrams-Trek would now be modern Trek, but I feel Berman-Trek isn't quite old enough to be classic Trek. Maybe recent-Trek? I feel old :(
 
Re: Isn't it time we realize Rick Berman was the genius of the ST we l

To use a Doctor Who metaphor, Rick Berman is the John Nathan-Turner of Star Trek.

Personally, I love most of the Trek produced under his purview (well, I love most of Trek in general): it created a bunch of moments I consider iconic parts of my childhood. I don't get the desire to utterly bash him with no thought to the impact he's had. Did he stay too long? Maybe, and franchise fatigue is a thing too. Personally, I'd still take a hell of a lot of Berman's Trek over Abrams' Trek as superior examples of Sci-Fi and superior examples of characterisation. But that's just me, and chances are I'm about to get called a ****ing idiot. But whatever.
 
Re: Isn't it time we realize Rick Berman was the genius of the ST we l

Personally, I'd still take a hell of a lot of Berman's Trek over Abrams' Trek as superior examples of Sci-Fi and superior examples of characterisation. But that's just me, and chances are I'm about to get called a ****ing idiot. But whatever.

Everyone has their own tastes and there's nothing wrong with that. But, for me, the Berman years seemed to have no vision other than try to cling to Roddenberry's.

Are season's three and four of TNG very, very good? Absolutely. But after that, I've hit a wall in each and every Berman season. To the point that they become unwatchable and go on my shelf and collect dust. It doesn't mean they didn't hit it out of the park every now and then (I love Enterprise's "Impulse" for example), but largely the shows and movies got to a point where they were unwatchable for me.

The more years that pass, the less and less I find myself watching the Berman series. I've been watching The Original Series and The Animated Series far more than the four spinoffs combined.
 
Re: Isn't it time we realize Rick Berman was the genius of the ST we l

Trek became stale under Berman. Instead of creating fantasy and being exciting, it became a business like any other, and it showed. Even Michael Westmore's makeup became dull and tiresome. I can imagine him like the Dunkin' Donuts guy getting up every morning, "Got to make the Klingons."
 
Re: Isn't it time we realize Rick Berman was the genius of the ST we l

Can Berman Trek still be considered "modern" if it's been off the air for almost ten years?

Abrams-Trek would now be modern Trek, but I feel Berman-Trek isn't quite old enough to be classic Trek. Maybe recent-Trek? I feel old :(

Mid Trek perhaps. Or Gen-X Trek, though that sounds even worse.
 
Re: Isn't it time we realize Rick Berman was the genius of the ST we l

I'm really not seeing any heart in Insurrection, frankly. If it did, the characters (good and bad) would have more conviction and thus be more compelling. If the characters were more compelling, then the story would've been better. And if the story was better, then the movie would be better. Rather, I'm just seeing dollar signs in the execs eyes, and it ended up being one big snoozefest. The many iterations of the draft and the drama to get the movie made is also well-publicized.

Insurrection had the bones of a good story and a decent movie. It's just that Berman wanted a softer, more cuddly film to counteract the darkness of First Contact. Had the focus of Insurrection been far more on the hanging out of Starfleet's dirty laundry a la DS9's In the Pale Moonlight, Starfleet politics, and Picard's actual insubordination to protect the Baku, it would've been a better, more thoughtful, more complex movie. And it would've been longer than the stinking 99 mins we got.

In many ways, Insurrection works for me as a film purely because of its contrast in tone to First Contact, but as a standalone feature, it's way too light and fluffy, and I can only really blame Berman for that.

A lot of people have jumped on the anti-Berman bandwagon over the years. I've been one of them. But I think longer term, his enormous contribution to Star Trek will be more valued. Most of TNG's best episodes would probably never have happened under GR's stewardship.
 
Re: Isn't it time we realize Rick Berman was the genius of the ST we l

I'm really not seeing any heart in Insurrection, frankly. If it did, the characters (good and bad) would have more conviction and thus be more compelling. If the characters were more compelling, then the story would've been better. And if the story was better, then the movie would be better. Rather, I'm just seeing dollar signs in the execs eyes, and it ended up being one big snoozefest. The many iterations of the draft and the drama to get the movie made is also well-publicized.

Insurrection had the bones of a good story and a decent movie. It's just that Berman wanted a softer, more cuddly film to counteract the darkness of First Contact. Had the focus of Insurrection been far more on the hanging out of Starfleet's dirty laundry a la DS9's In the Pale Moonlight, Starfleet politics, and Picard's actual insubordination to protect the Baku, it would've been a better, more thoughtful, more complex movie. And it would've been longer than the stinking 99 mins we got.

In many ways, Insurrection works for me as a film purely because of its contrast in tone to First Contact, but as a standalone feature, it's way too light and fluffy, and I can only really blame Berman for that.

A lot of people have jumped on the anti-Berman bandwagon over the years. I've been one of them. But I think longer term, his enormous contribution to Star Trek will be more valued. Most of TNG's best episodes would probably never have happened under GR's stewardship.

^ Odd Berman said in an interview that it was Piller's idea to go lighter after First Contact. In Piller's book Fade In, he notes that he wanted to show that the Federation was in a better spot than it was during the previous few years. A reference to the Dominion War and First Contact. According to Piller in his book, they talked about doing a Dominion conflict book but Berman did not want to do it.

Piller tried to tell a classic story but it just didn't hook the audience. There isn't anything in INS to make people care. Compare INS to other films with the Natives being displaced by outsiders theme; like Avatar (2009), Pocahontas, Fern Gulley. The only film that rises above the others is Avatar. Because there is more going on than just "evil white man victimizing Natives for their land and resources.
 
Re: Isn't it time we realize Rick Berman was the genius of the ST we l

Abrams made good movie called Star Trek but he didn't make a good Star Trek movie.

There's no reason something philosophically in sync with Star Trek couldn't be profitable, it would just be more difficult to pull off.

I didn't find the Abrams "philosophically out-of-sync" with the rest of the franchise. Especially Star Trek: The Original Series. :shrug:

TOS Kirk won battles by tricking enemies into thinking he had corbomite aboard and by talking robots into self destructing. In some cases by convincing the enemy to stop fighting.

Abrams Kirk won them by beaming in and shooting people.

Not the same thing.
 
Re: Isn't it time we realize Rick Berman was the genius of the ST we l

Abrams made good movie called Star Trek but he didn't make a good Star Trek movie.

There's no reason something philosophically in sync with Star Trek couldn't be profitable, it would just be more difficult to pull off.

I didn't find the Abrams "philosophically out-of-sync" with the rest of the franchise. Especially Star Trek: The Original Series. :shrug:

TOS Kirk won battles by tricking enemies into thinking he had corbomite aboard and by talking robots into self destructing. In some cases by convincing the enemy to stop fighting.

Abrams Kirk won them by beaming in and shooting people.

Not the same thing.

We've seen Abramsverse Kirk all of twice. And Jim Kirk (TOS) wasn't shy about using his phaser when necessary.
 
Re: Isn't it time we realize Rick Berman was the genius of the ST we l

That's what SHE said!
 
Re: Isn't it time we realize Rick Berman was the genius of the ST we l

I'm really not seeing any heart in Insurrection, frankly. If it did, the characters (good and bad) would have more conviction and thus be more compelling. If the characters were more compelling, then the story would've been better. And if the story was better, then the movie would be better. Rather, I'm just seeing dollar signs in the execs eyes, and it ended up being one big snoozefest. The many iterations of the draft and the drama to get the movie made is also well-publicized.

Insurrection had the bones of a good story and a decent movie. It's just that Berman wanted a softer, more cuddly film to counteract the darkness of First Contact. Had the focus of Insurrection been far more on the hanging out of Starfleet's dirty laundry a la DS9's In the Pale Moonlight, Starfleet politics, and Picard's actual insubordination to protect the Baku, it would've been a better, more thoughtful, more complex movie. And it would've been longer than the stinking 99 mins we got.
.

Very much in agreement. I'm not a fan of Into Darkness, but I did like that we had a movie that questioned Starfleet's mission and purpose, and therefore reified its mission into something a bit more hopeful and focused than assumed by the end thanks to our heroes. It had been done before in other Trek to be sure (as you mentioned, DS9, and also TUC), but the Abramsverse needed something definitive like that for clarification.

I feel the same way that could have been with Insurrection. Heck, it ended up not being an actual insurrection anyway since there was no real gray area for politics, just clear cut bad guys and no sense of prolonged personal conflict. Exploration of morals and philosophy is just as valid as exploring deep space, but Trek movies rarely seem to get that right. At least Into Darkness constantly had nuKirk making mistakes and then paying dearly for each and every one of them, whereas Picard was never in the wrong and thus never had any internal struggle for the audience to grapple with.

According to Piller in his book, they talked about doing a Dominion conflict book but Berman did not want to do it.

I'd agree with Berman not to do a Dominion conflict so as to keep the movies and TV show separate, since they should stand themselves. That's the kind of operational call that I think a good producer should do (of course, if he said there *should* be Dominion, that's his right as well). But I think part of the problem with Berman was this tendency to micromanage; for him, it seemed like it wasn't enough to tell the writers what direction to go, but to modify it to the point where Berman was essentially a writer and thus creative mind himself.

Contrast to season 4 of Enterprise, where he took more of a backseat to creative duties and the show flourished creatively, but he still maintained cohesion of vision and managed the show as usual. In fact, I'd argue that part of the reason why S4 is better received is not just because of Coto taking more leadership, but also that it allowed Berman to focus more on his own production strengths as well, which tend to be administrative.
 
Last edited:
Re: Isn't it time we realize Rick Berman was the genius of the ST we l

Berman is... a mixed bag.

I don't hate him as I once did.

But as the man in charge, he has to accept responsibility for the failures if he wants credit for the successes.

I think if he hadn't involved himself so much in the creative aspects, and let those better suited do so while he was the overall shepherd... it would have gone better than it did.

He caused a lot of frustrations; frustrations that made a lot of talented people walk away when they should have stayed.

There are 3 men who've had considerable power and influence over Trek. Roddenberry, Bennett and Berman. Each had their wins and losses. At a certain point, each of the first two was replaced. Berman avoided that fate the longest; perhaps too long. I think after Voyager, they should have given the reigns to someone new. Maybe even earlier than that.

He's not the villain we all used to think he was. But then absence makes the heart grow fonder, and hindsight is 20/20 and all that.
 
Re: Isn't it time we realize Rick Berman was the genius of the ST we l

To use a Doctor Who metaphor, Rick Berman is the John Nathan-Turner of Star Trek.

That's exactly what I was going to say (though I doubt Berman's behind the scenes story will have quite as many dubious moments as JN-T's biography did).

Both men were excellent at the job of actually getting their respective shows made (though over the decadeish they were in charge there were more a few Very Silly Decisions), but weren't creative people and didn't seem to be capable of good judgement when it came to putting someone in charge of running the script side of things.

When they picked right, you got stories that matched the overall quality of the production side of things. When they didn't, you got terrible television, not matter how solidly made (though as fans, no doubt we'll all have our own ideas on who was the best and worst of those people was, personally I'm in the Piller and Behr camp).

Braga is a good example of what I'd consider a poor choice to be in charge of a Trek show. It's easy to forget now, but during TNG his scripts were extremely popular, and he's certainly someone you'd want on staff to do a couple of really weird out there episodes a year to shake things up.

But his style of writing just wasn't what you'd want overseeing every episode, or at least for the sort of show Berman Trek was aiming to be, if they'd have tried for a full on nuts series like Farscape Braga would probably have rocked it.

Once he's in charge the things that might be fun once or twice a season (wacky accidents doing terrible things to the crew, insane temporal anomalies ect) very quickly become tired and bored and the fact he's generally a writer who does more standalone tales (so the crew can be turned into monsters and back in a day with no need to ever mention this again) actually hurt Voyager, a show where the basic format actually required a fairly heavy level of inter-episode continuity.

Mind, that's a flaw in the creation process that pre-dates Braga becoming a show runner, no one there at the start of Voyager seems to have properly thought through the implications of the ship being on this big journey from the other end of the galaxy (it really should have wound up more serialised than DS9, at least Sisko can get in new crewmembers and equipment) and how that would work against what seems to have been a desire to do TNG Redux. And that is Berman's fault.
 
Re: Isn't it time we realize Rick Berman was the genius of the ST we l

I have never trusted Berman. And I never will.

I will never forgive him....for the death of Star Trek.
 
Re: Isn't it time we realize Rick Berman was the genius of the ST we l

Insurrection had the bones of a good story and a decent movie. It's just that Berman wanted a softer, more cuddly film to counteract the darkness of First Contact.

Whoever made the decision, it was a bad one.
First, FC was not a particularly dark film, especially coming after STVI (cold war, racist Kirk) and GEN (death of Kirk, Enterprise destroyed again). After those two, FC was basically a caper movie.
Second, what kind of knuckle-headed producer says "That last film was the biggest hit of the franchise - let's make the next one totally different"?
 
Re: Isn't it time we realize Rick Berman was the genius of the ST we l

I think Rick Berman is the most underrated, most underappriciated individual well, like, of ALL time in ANY field... Think about it...
I did, and it's a patently ridiculous notion. ANY time in ANY field?

Just. No.


Nemesis came in ahead of schedule and under budget, from what I understand, to the point where Berman refused Paramount's initial offer of a larger budget. Ok. But that time could've been spent refining the script and going through a couple more drafts, ...
Coming in ahead of schedule and under budget is the tail end of the process, meaning you've shot the movie. How the heck does that relate to how you should have spent time before you shot the movie? What you're suggesting requires slingshotting around the sun... and creates a whole mess of paradoxes. ;)
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top