• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Is there a lot of inbreeding in the Soong family line?

I think they are clones. Arik had a long-term plan once he gave up on genetic manipulation, one that would take generations to accomplish, on his own, so he did the logical thing (By Soong standards) and gave himself generations.
 
But I agree that they aren't intended to be clones. It's just a TV storytelling convention to have ancestors and descendants played by the same actor. Such as Marty McFly's future son and daughter both being played by Michael J. Fox.

And not really a justified one... look at Janeway's ancestor. Allowing 30y per generation, from 2001 to 2336 that's 11 generations. Kathryn Janeway had only 1/2048 of Shannon O'Donnell's DNA.

BUT, Kate Mulgrew and Brent Spiner are both amazing actors. Why not let them stretch a bit?
 
It's not inbreeding if you clone yourself and raise your own clone.

There's no "Breeding" to be had since you're not mating with anybody.

It's like Jango Fett & Boba Fett.

Minus the accelerated aging for the clones issues.

And in a further plot twist, Arik has actually been transferring his own consciousness to each successive clone, so he lives on as part of his master plan to rule the galaxy. :shifty:

Kor
I'd think it would be easier for each Soong to upload their mental conciousness to a machine and be part of a Great Network of previous Soongs, living on the server, ready to help the current generation of Soongs.

As one Soong's natural life passes, their mind will be uploaded to the Soong Family Cloud Server.
 
Wonder if they were Trek style clones (exact same-age duplication of a person) or realistic clones (creating a blastocyst that will, in 9 months, grow into an infant version of said person).
 
Soong is like Scaroth, last of the Jagaroth. Material splinters of his being are scattered through time. His ultimate goal? Rewrite history and stop Data from getting blown to smithereens in the first place. ;)

"I say, what a wonderful android, he's so violent!"

giphy.gif
 
Kate Mulgrew played an ancestor who looked just like her.

Jolene Blalock played an ancestor who looked just like her.

There were portraits of Jean-Luc Picard's ancestors who looked just like Patrick Stewart.

It's just a TV thing. There's nothing more to it than that.

Although I do like the theory that they're all clones.

Ya but ff sake they are really overdoing it with Soongs.
 
For both Janeway & T'Pol the situation is a bit different though:
In both cases, Janeway/T'Pol were the ones telling a story, and clear cases of self-inserts/unreliable narrator. Especially in Janeway's case, her story didn't line up with historical records. So using the same actor made a ton of sense.

Older Brent Spiner on ENT looked a lot different than old-make-up Spiner on TNG, so I can totally buy that these are supposed to be different people. On PIC S1 that's more difficult. And especially if they introduce another one in S2, they need to find an explanation (cloning/robot bodies would suffice).

That leaves us with only the real question: How come that Data itself looks like he's aging throughout the years?:lol:
 
That leaves us with only the real question: How come that Data itself looks like he's aging throughout the years?:lol:

According to TNG: "Inheritance", when they discover Julia Tainer is an android, the following exchange happens in sickbay:

RIKER: "Why does the scanner read her as a human?"
CRUSHER: "Because she has a feedback processor designed to send out a false bio-signal."
LAFORGE: "It's part of her ageing program. Not only does she age in appearance like Data, her vital signs change too."

So Data's physical appearance can change over time, which gives him the approximation of ageing – which is handy, because of course Brent Spiner isn't immortal. Quite what this would mean for Data left to "age" naturally for centuries isn't entirely clear, since Data has also stated that he's effectively immortal barring accidents (TNG: "Time's Arrow, Part 1": "Until now it has been theoretically possible that I would live an unlimited period of time".)
 
For both Janeway & T'Pol the situation is a bit different though:
In both cases, Janeway/T'Pol were the ones telling a story, and clear cases of self-inserts/unreliable narrator. Especially in Janeway's case, her story didn't line up with historical records. So using the same actor made a ton of sense.

I'd say especially in T'Pol's case, as we see a photo of Janeway's ancestor, while with T'Pol's story we're left with the possibility she made the whole thing up (don't even get me started on the velcro stinger suggesting otherwise: we know who invented velcro, when and how).
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top